skip to main content
10.1145/2020408.2020590acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Mining mobility data to minimise travellers' spending on public transport

Published:21 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the public transport infrastructure of large cities expands, transport operators are diversifying the range and prices of tickets that can be purchased for travel. However, selecting the best fare for each individual traveller's needs is a complex process that is left almost completely unaided. By examining the relation between urban mobility and fare purchasing habits in large datasets from London, England's public transport network, we estimate that travellers in the city cumulatively spend, per year, up to approximately GBP 200 million more than they need to, as a result of purchasing the incorrect fares. We propose to address these incorrect purchases by leveraging the huge volumes of data that travellers create as they move about the city, by providing, to each of them, personalised ticket recommendations based on their estimated future travel patterns. In this work, we explore the viability of building a fare-recommendation system for public transport networks by (a) formalising the problem as two separate prediction problems and (b) evaluating a number of algorithms that aim to match travellers to the best fare. We find that applying data mining techniques to public transport data has the potential to provide travellers with substantial savings.

References

  1. R. W. Floyd. Algorithm 97: Shortest Path. Communications of the ACM, 5(6), June 1962. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Zhou and E. A. Hansen. Breadth-First Heuristic Search. Artificial Intelligence, 170, April 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Roth, S.M. Kang, M. Batty, and M. Barthelemy. Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical Flows. PLOS ONE, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. W. Anderson. The Statistical Analysis of Time Series. Wiley-Interscience, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. R. Quinlan. Improved Use of Continuous Attributes in C4.5. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4:77--90, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, and P. Reutemann. The WEKA Data Mining Software. SIGKDD Explorations, 11, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. C. Gonzalez, C. A. Hidalgo, and A-L Barabasi. Understanding Individual Human Mobility Patterns. Nature, 453:779--782, June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. C. Ratti, R.M. Pulselli, S. Williams, and D. Frenchman. Mobile Landscapes: Using Location Data from Cell Phones for Urban Analysis. Environment and Planning B, 33(5):727--748, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Brockmann, L. Hufnagel, and T. Geisel. The Scaling Laws of Human Travel. Nature, 439, January 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. J. Graham and S. Glaister. Spatial Implications of Transport Pricing. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 40(2), May 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Ferris, K. Watkins, and A. Borning. OneBusAway: Results from Providing Real-Time Arrival Information for Public Transit. In ACM CHI, Atlanta, GA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J.L. Ambite, G. Barish, C.A. Knoblock, M. Muslea, J. Oh, and S. Minton. Getting from Here to There: Interactive Planning and Agent Execution for Optimizing Travel. In 14th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI), pages 862--869, Menlo Park, California, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. Schwartz. The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. Harper Perennial, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. O. Etzioni, C. A. Knoblock, R. Tuchinda, and A. Yates. To Buy or Not to Buy: Mining Airfare Data to Minimize Ticket Purchase Price. In ACM KDD, Washington DC, USA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Borchers, J. Herlocker, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Ganging up on Information Overload. IEEE Computer, 31:106--108, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. Kantor, editors. Recommender System Handbook. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Quercia, N. Lathia, F. Calabrese, G. Di Lorenzo, and J. Crowcroft. Recommending Social Events from Mobile Phone Location Data. In IEEE ICDM, Sydney, Australia, December 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. Jang. Travel Time and Transfer Analysis Using Transit Smart Card Data. Transportation Research Board, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. H. Bryan and P. Blythe. Understanding Behaviour Through Smartcard Data Analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 160(4), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Mining mobility data to minimise travellers' spending on public transport

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '11: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
        August 2011
        1446 pages
        ISBN:9781450308137
        DOI:10.1145/2020408

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 August 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader