skip to main content
10.1145/1979742.1979640acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

This design case study examines and illustrates the concept of self-evidence by applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. It invites a re-thinking of the process of design for technology, one that includes design for the experience of the self. Supported by concepts of somatic phenomenology and discourse surrounding 'felt-life' within HCI, this case study articulates the concept of self-evidence through the application of somatic body-based practices as a framework for technology design within HCI. The case study utilizes examples from the design process of the interactive, networked wearable art installation called whisper. Concepts of somatic connoisseurship are exemplified throughout all phases of an interdisciplinary artist-led design process.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

cs206.mov

mov

29.4 MB

References

  1. Alexander, C. (2002). The Nature of Order: An Essay on the Art of Building and the Nature of the Universe, Book One: The Phenomenon of Life. Berkeley: The Center for Environmental Structure.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boal, A. (1992). Games For Actors and Non-Actors. London, UK: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogart, A. and Landau, T. (2005). The Viewpoints Book: A Practical Guide to Viewpoints and Composition. New York: Theatre Communications Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, R. (1996). The Alexander Technique Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Improve Breathing, Posture and Well-Being. Boston: Journey Editions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrow, T. (1999). The Social Basis of Consciousness. London, UK: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Deikman, A.J. (1983). The Observing Self: Mysticism and Psychotherapy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Depraz, N., Varela, F.J., and Vermersch, P. (2003). On Becoming Aware, A Pragmatics of Experiencing (Advances In Consciousness Research, 43). Benjamins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Egan, K. (1997). The Educated Mind: How Cognitive Tools Shape Our Understanding. Univ of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisner, E.W. (1998). The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisner, E.W. (2002). The Arts and the Creation of Mind. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fallman, D. (2008). The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration. Design Issues, 24(3), Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 4--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldenkrais, M. (1972). Awareness Through Movement. San Francisco: Harper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1988c). Technologies of the Self, in Technologies of the Self, A Seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraleigh, S.H. (1999). Family Resemblance, in Fraleigh, S. and Hanstein, P. (eds.) (1999). Researching Dance: Evolving Modes of Inquiry, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, p. 11--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fraleigh, S.H. (2004). Dancing Identity: Metaphysics in Motion. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gendlin, E.T. (1996). Focusing-Oriented Psychotherapy: A Manual of Experiential Method, New York: Guildford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, D.H. (ed.) (1995). Bone, Breath and Gesture: Practices of Embodiment. North Atlantic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Levine, S. (2000). Topology of awareness: therapeutic implications of logical modalities of multiple levels of awareness, Journal of Poetry Therapy, 14(2), Springer,79--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Oliveros, P., see http://www.deeplistening.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Polyani, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Reilly, J.P. (1998). Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electropathology, Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sanches, P., Höök,K. et al (2010), Mind the Body! Designing a Mobile Stress Management Application Encouraging Personal Reflection, DIS 2010, ACM Press, 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Schiphorst, T., (2008). The Varieties of User Experience: Bridging Embodied Methodologies from Somatics and Performance to HCI, www.sfu.ca/~tschipho/PhD/PhD_thesis.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1998). The Primacy of Movement, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Shusterman, R. (2008). Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Swenson. D. (1999). Ashtanga Yoga: The Practice Manual, Austin, Texas: Ashtanga Yoga Productions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner, V.W. (1986). Dewey, Dilthey, and Drama: An Essay in the Anthropology of Experience, The Anthropology of Experience, Turner, V.W., and Bruner, E.M. (eds.), Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 33--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wright, P., Blythe, M., and McCarthy, J. (2006). User experience and the idea of design in HCI, LNCS, 3941, Springer Verlag, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wright, P., & McCarthy, J. (2008). Empathy and experience in HCI, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy), CHI '08. ACM Press, 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yasuo, Y. (1987). The Body: Toward an Eastern Mind-Body Theory. T.P. Kasulis (ed.), (N. Shigenori and T.P. Kasulis, Trans.), Albany, New York: State University of New York Press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zimmerman, J. (2009). Designing for the Self: Making products that help people become the person they desire to be, CHI 2009, April 4-9, 2009, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader