skip to main content
10.1145/1969773.1969786acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where to turn my car?: comparison of a tactile display and a conventional car navigation system under high load condition

Published:11 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Tactile displays are an actively studied means to convey large amount of spatial information in the car. Their advantage compared to conventional car navigation systems is their ability to free the driver's visual and auditory senses. Previously the tactile displays were integrated into the seat of a car to present multiple direction information to the driver. However, in the commercial cars the seat is used to provide the vibro-tactile warning signals, so driver might not differentiate between navigation and warning information. Furthermore, the amount of information presented with tactile displays can cause significant cognitive workload, performance degradation and distraction to the driver. In this paper, we explore different methods of encoding multiple directions information with a tactile belt in the car. We compare the vibro-tactile presentation of spatial turn-by-turn information with a conventional car navigation system to measure cognitive workload, performance and distraction of the driver. We found that drivers showed better orientation performance on the tactile display than with the conventional car navigation system. At the same time there was no difference in cognitive workload, performance, and distraction. Thus, a tactile interface can be useful to present more information than simple left or right directions in high load driving conditions in which drivers are required to observe the traffic situation with their visual and auditory senses.

References

  1. A. Asif, W. Heuten, and S. Boll. Exploring distance encodings with a tactile display to convey turn by turn information in automobiles. In NordiCHI2010, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. M. Bach, M. G. Jæger, M. B. Skov, and N. G. T. Aalborg. Interacting with in-vehicle systems: understanding, measuring, and evaluating attention. In BCS-HCI2009, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Baldauf and M. Wittmann. Time perception as a workload measure in simulated car driving. Applied Ergonomics, 40(5): 929--935, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Balzano, N. Chiaravalloti, J. Lengenfelder, N. Moore, and J. DeLuca. Does the scoring of late responses affect the outcome of the paced auditory serial addition task (pasat)? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(8): 819--825, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Brewster and L. M. Brown. Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In AUIC '04, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. P. Brumby, D. D. Salvucci, and A. Howes. Focus on driving: How cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving. In CHI2009, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. C. de Vries, J. B. van Erp, and R. J. Kiefer. Direction coding using a tactile chair. Applied Ergonomics, 40: 477--484, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. B. V. Erp and H. A. V. Veen. Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(4--5): 247--256, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Fukuda, T. Inoue, Y. Sato, and Y. Hayashi. Study on level crossing design and evaluation method based on cognitive model. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 40: 26--31, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. V. P. A. Hancock and P. A. Desmond. Stress, Workload, and Fatigue. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. H. Hogema, S. C. D. Vries, J. B. F. V. Erp, and R. J. Kiefer. A tactile seat for direction coding in car driving: Field evaluation. IEEE Trans. on Haptics, 2 (4): 181--188, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. E. Llaneras and J. P. Singer. In-vehicle navigation systems: Interface characteristics and industry trends. In Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. W. Mathias, M. S. Stanford, and R. J. Houston. The physiological experience of the paced auditory serial addition task (pasat): Does the pasat induce autonomic arousal? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(4): 543--554, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. B. Reimer, B. Mehler, J. F. Coughlin, K. M. Godfrey, and C. Tan. Assessment of drivers' workload: Performance and subjective and physiological indexes, in stress, workload, and fatigue. In AutomotiveUI2009, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Ren, H. Zhou, and X. Fu. A deeper look at gender difference in multitasking: Gender-specific mechanism of cognitive control. Natural Computation, 5: 13--17, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. F. Svahn. In-car navigation usage: An end-user survey on existing systems. In IRIS27, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. van Erp and H. van Veen. Vibro-tactile information presentation in automobiles. In Eurohaptics 2001, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. B. F. van Erp, H. A. H. C. van Veen, C. Jansen, and T. Dobbins. Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt. ACM Trans. on Applied Perception, 2: 106--117, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. D. Wickens. Processing resources in attention. In Processing resources in attention. London: Academic, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. D. Wickens. Multiple resources and mental workload. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3): 449--455, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Where to turn my car?: comparison of a tactile display and a conventional car navigation system under high load condition

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AutomotiveUI '10: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
          November 2010
          160 pages
          ISBN:9781450304375
          DOI:10.1145/1969773

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 November 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader