skip to main content
10.1145/1953163.1953308acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring the effectiveness of error messages designed for novice programmers

Published:09 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Good error messages are critical for novice programmers. Re-cognizing this, the DrRacket programming environment provides a series of pedagogically-inspired language subsets with error messages customized to each subset. We apply human-factors research methods to explore the effectiveness of these messages. Unlike existing work in this area, we study messages at a fine-grained level by analyzing the edits students make in response to various classes of errors. We present a rubric (which is not language specific) to evaluate student responses, apply it to a course-worth of student lab work, and describe what we have learned about using the rubric effectively. We also discuss some concrete observations on the effectiveness of these messages.

References

  1. Chabert, J.M. and Higginbotham, T.F. An Investigation of Novice Programmer Errors in IBM 370 (OS) Assembly Lan-guage. In Proceedings of the ACM Southeast Regional Confe-rence, pages 319--323. 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37--46, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Coull, N.J. SNOOPIE: Development Of A Learning Support Tool For Novice Programmers Within A Conceptual Framework. PhD Thesis, School of Computer Science, University Of St. Andrews, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fagin, B.S. and Merkle, L. Quantitative analysis of the effects of robots on introductory Computer Science education. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 2(4):1--18, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Findler, R.B., Clements, J., Flanagan, C., Flatt, M., Krishna-murthi, S., Steckler, P., and Felleisen, M. DrScheme: A programming environment for Scheme. Journal of Functional Programming, 12(02):159--182, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gross, P. and Powers, K. Evaluating assessments of novice programming environments. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computing Education Research, :99--110, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hagan, D. and Markham, S. Teaching Java with the BlueJ environment. In Proceedings of Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference. Citeseer, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hage, J. and Keeken, P.V. Mining Helium programs with Neon. In Technical Report, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Holt, R.C., Wortman, D.B., Barnard, D.T., and Cordy, J.R. SP/k: a system for teaching computer programming. Communications of the ACM, 20(5):301--309, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hristova, M., Misra, A., Rutter, M., and Mercuri, R. Identifying and correcting Java programming errors for introductory computer science students. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 153--156. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jackson, J., Cobb, M., and Carver, C. Identifying top Java errors for novice programmers. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, pages T4C--24. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jadud, M.C. A First Look at Novice Compilation Behaviour Using BlueJ. Computer Science Education, 15(1):25--40, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jadud, M.C. Methods and tools for exploring novice compilation behaviour. In Proceedings of the International Work-shop on Computing Education Research, pages 73--84. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Köksal, M.F., Baar, R.E., and Üsküdarl1, S. Screen-Replay: A Session Recording and Analysis Tool for DrScheme. In Proceedings of the Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop, Technical Report, California Polytechnic State University, CPSLO-CSC-09-03, pages 103--110. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lane, H.C. and VanLehn, K. Intention-based scoring: An approach to measuring success at solving the composition problem. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1):373--377, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Levy, R.B., Ben-Ari, M., and Uronen, P.A. The Jeliot 2000 program animation system. Computers & Education, 40(1):1--15, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Moskal, B., Lurie, D., and Cooper, S. Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Science Education, 35:75--79, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Murphy, L., Lewandowski, G., McCauley, R., Simon, B., Thomas, L., and Zander, C. Debugging: the good, the bad, and the quirky - a qualitative analysis of novices' strategies. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1):163--167, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ng Cheong Vee, M., Mannock, K., and Meyer, B. Empirical study of novice errors and error paths in object-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Higher Education Academy, Subject Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, pages 54--58. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nienaltowski, M., Pedroni, M., and Meyer, B. Compiler Error Messages: What Can Help Novices? Proceedings of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 39:168--172, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., Bennedsen, J., Devlin, M., and Paterson, J. A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(4):204--223, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ragonis, N. and Ben-Ari, M. On understanding the statics and dynamics of object-oriented programs. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1):226--230, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rey, J.S. From Alice To BlueJ: A Transition To Java. Master's thesis, School of Computing, Robert Gordon University, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Spohrer, J.C. and Soloway, E. Novice mistakes: are the folk wisdoms correct? Communications of the ACM, 29(7)1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Van Haaster, K. and Hagan, D. Teaching and Learning with BlueJ: an Evaluation of a Pedagogical Tool. In Information Science + Information Technology Education Joint Conference. Citeseer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Measuring the effectiveness of error messages designed for novice programmers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '11: Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
        March 2011
        754 pages
        ISBN:9781450305006
        DOI:10.1145/1953163

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 March 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGCSE '11 Paper Acceptance Rate107of315submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader