skip to main content
10.1145/1900441.1900464acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Participatory healthcare service design and innovation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the use of Experience Based Design (EBD), a participatory methodology for healthcare service design, to improve the outpatient service for older people at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. The challenges in moving from stories to designing improvements, co-designing for wicked problems, and the effects of participants' limited scopes of action are discussed. It concludes by proposing that such problems are common to participatory service design in large institutions and recommends that future versions of EBD incorporate more tools to promote divergent thinking.

References

  1. Arnstein, S., (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bate, P. and Robert, G. (2007). Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: The concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. RadJacke Publishing. Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan, R. (1995). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. In: Margolin, V. and Buchanan, R. (eds.). The Idea of Design: A Design Issues Reader. Cambridge, Mass, USA, MIT Press, 3--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carroll, J. M. (1995). Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dearden, A., Lauener, A., Slack, F., Roast, C. & Cassidy, S. (2006). Make it so! Jean-Luc Picard, Bart Simpson and the Design of e-Public Services. In, G. Jacucci, F. Kensing, I Wagner & J. Blomberg (Eds.). Expanding Boundaries in Design, Procs. PDC 2006 Vol. 1, pp. 67--76. New York, NY, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. McCarthy, J. & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, Mass: MIT. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement (2010). Experience based design. {online} at: http://www.institute.nhs.uk/ebdGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Pawson R., and Tilley N., (1997). Realistic Evaluation, London, Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Schön, D. A. (1995). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (2), 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference
    November 2010
    314 pages
    ISBN:9781450301312
    DOI:10.1145/1900441

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 November 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader