Rock Leung
Leah Findlater
Abstract
Mobile computing devices can offer older adults (ages 65+) support in their daily lives, but older adults often find such devices difficult to learn and use. One potential design approach to improve the learnability of mobile devices is a Multi-Layered (ML) interface, where novice users start with a reduced-functionality interface layer that only allows them to perform basic tasks, before progressing to a more complex interface layer when they are comfortable. We studied the effects of a ML interface on older adults’ performance in learning tasks on a mobile device. We conducted a controlled experiment with 16 older (ages 65--81) and 16 younger participants (age 21--36), who performed tasks on either a 2-layer or a nonlayered (control) address book application, implemented on a commercial smart phone. We found that the ML interface’s Reduced-Functionality layer, compared to the control’s Full-Functionality layer, better helped users to master a set of basic tasks and to retain that ability 30 minutes later. When users transitioned from the Reduced-Functionality to the Full-Functionality interface layer, their performance on the previously learned tasks was negatively affected, but no negative impact was found on learning new, advanced tasks. Overall, the ML interface provided greater benefit for older participants than for younger participants in terms of task completion time during initial learning, perceived complexity, and preference. We discuss how the ML interface approach is suitable for improving the learnability of mobile applications, particularly for older adults.
- }}Birdi, K. S. and Zapf, D. 1997. Age differences in reactions to errors in computer-based work. Behav. Inform. Technol. 16, 6, 309--19.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- }}Carroll, J. M. and Carrithers, C. 1984. Training wheels in a user interface. Commun. ACM. 27, 800--806. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}Catrambone, R. and Carroll, J. M. 1986. Learning a word processing system with training wheels and guided exploration. In Proceedings of CHI/GI. ACM, New York, NY, 169--174. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N. J.Google Scholar
- }}DeYoung, C. G. and Spence, I. 2004. Profiling information technology users: En route to dynamic personalization. Comput. Human Behav. 20, 55--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- }}Dickinson, A., Smith, M. J., Arnott, J. L., Newell, A. F., and Hill, R. L. 2007. Approaches to Web search and navigation for older computer novices. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, New York, NY, 281--290. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}Echt, K. V., Morrell, R. W., and Park, D. C. 1998. Effects of age and training formats on basic computer skill acquisition in older adults. Educ. Gerontology 24, 1, 3--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- }}Findlater, L. and McGrenere, J. 2007. Evaluating reduced-functionality interfaces according to feature findability and awareness. In Proceedings of INTERACT. Springer Berlin, 592--605. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., and Sharit, J. 2009. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 2nd Ed. CRC Press, London.Google Scholar
- }}Freudenthal, D. 2001. The role of age, foreknowledge, and complexity in learning to operate a complex device. Behav. Inform. Technol. 20, 1, 23--35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- }}Grossman, T., Fitzmaurice, G., and Attar, R. 2009. A survey of software learnability: Metrics, methodologies, and guidelines. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 649--658. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}Hawthorn, D. 2005. Training wheels for older users. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction. CHISIG of Australia, Narrabundah, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}Hickman, J., Rogers, W., and Fisk, A. 2007. Training older adults to use new technology. J. Gerontology, 62B (Special Issue I), 77--84.Google Scholar
- }}Kurniawan, S., Mahmud, M., and Nugroho, Y. 2006. A study of the use of mobile phones by older persons. In Extended Abstracts of CHI. ACM, New York, 989--994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}McGrenere, J., Baecker, R. M., and Booth, K. S. 2002. An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, New York, 164--170. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., and Figueredo, A. J. 2007. Missing Data: A Gentle Introduction. Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
- }}Millward, P. 2003. The ‘grey digital divide’: Perception, exclusion, and barriers of access to the Internet for older people. First Monday, 8, 7. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_7/millward/index.html.Google ScholarCross Ref
- }}Milner B. 1971. Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. Brit. Med. Bull., 27, 272--277.Google ScholarCross Ref
- }}Morrell, R., Park, D., Mayhorn, C., and Kelley, C. 2000. Effects of age and instructions on teaching older adults to use ELDERCOMM, an electronic bulletin board system. Educ. Gerontology 26, 221--235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- }}Nielsen, J. 1996. Usability metrics: Tracking interface improvements. IEEE Softw. 13, 6, 12--13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}Ofcom. 2006. Media Literacy Audit: Report on Media Literacy amongst Older People. Ofcom, London, UK.Google Scholar
- }}Quintana, C., Carra, A., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. 2002. Learner-Centered Design: Reflections and New Directions. In Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, Carroll J., Ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 605--626.Google Scholar
- }}Rogers, W., Mead, S., Walker, N., and Cabrera., E. 1996. Training older adults to use automatic teller machines. Hum. Fact. 38, 3, 425--433.Google ScholarCross Ref
- }}Scheffer, J. 2002. Dealing with missing data. Resear. Lett. Inform. Math. Sci. 3, 153--160.Google Scholar
- }}Shneiderman, B. 2003. Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design. In Proceedings of CUU. ACM, New York, 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- }}Wechsler, D. 1981. WAIS-R Manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. The Psychological Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
- }}Ziefle, M. and Bay, S. 2004. Mental models of a cellular phone menu: Comparing older and younger novice users. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices (MobileHCI). Springer-Verlag Berlin, 25--37.Google Scholar
- }}Ziefle, M. and Bay, S. 2005. How older adults meet complexity: Aging effects on the usability of different mobile phones. Behav. Inform. Technol. 24, 5, 375--389.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Multi-Layered Interfaces to Improve Older Adults’ Initial Learnability of Mobile Applications
Recommendations
Improving the learnability of mobile device applications for older adults
CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMobile devices have the potential to support many older adults (age 65+) in their daily lives. However, older adults find it difficult to learn to use many existing mobile device applications and their interfaces. The goal of this dissertation research ...
How Older Adults Learn to Use Mobile Devices: Survey and Field Investigations
Mobile computing devices, such as smart phones, offer benefits that may be especially valuable to older adults (age 65+). Yet, older adults have been shown to have difficulty learning to use these devices. In the research presented in this article, we ...
Learnability Assessment of Speech-Based Intelligent Personal Assistants by Older Adults
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged PopulationAbstractOlder adults often have problems and difficulties with adopting technologies but the popularity of technology usage among older adults had increased significantly in recent years. Separately, Speech-Based Intelligent Personal Assistants (sIPA) or ...
Comments