skip to main content
10.1145/1835804.1835951acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Nonnegative shared subspace learning and its application to social media retrieval

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although tagging has become increasingly popular in online image and video sharing systems, tags are known to be noisy, ambiguous, incomplete and subjective. These factors can seriously affect the precision of a social tag-based web retrieval system. Therefore improving the precision performance of these social tag-based web retrieval systems has become an increasingly important research topic. To this end, we propose a shared subspace learning framework to leverage a secondary source to improve retrieval performance from a primary dataset. This is achieved by learning a shared subspace between the two sources under a joint Nonnegative Matrix Factorization in which the level of subspace sharing can be explicitly controlled. We derive an efficient algorithm for learning the factorization, analyze its complexity, and provide proof of convergence. We validate the framework on image and video retrieval tasks in which tags from the LabelMe dataset are used to improve image retrieval performance from a Flickr dataset and video retrieval performance from a YouTube dataset. This has implications for how to exploit and transfer knowledge from readily available auxiliary tagging resources to improve another social web retrieval system. Our shared subspace learning framework is applicable to a range of problems where one needs to exploit the strengths existing among multiple and heterogeneous datasets.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

kdd2010_gupta_nssli_01.mov

mov

84.8 MB

References

  1. http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/overview.html. Accessed in Oct, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. http://www.flickr.com/services/api/. Accessed in July, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. H.D. Abdulla, M. Polovincak, and V. Snasel. Search results clustering using nonnegative matrix factorization (nmf). ASONAM '09, pages 320--323, July 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M.W. Berry and M. Browne. Email surveillance using non-negative matrix factorization. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 11(3):249--264, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Caruana. Multitask learning. Machine Learning, 28(1):41--75,1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, D.B. Rubin, et al. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39(1):1--38, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona. One-shot learning of object categories. PAMI, 28(4):594--611, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S.A. Golder and B.A. Huberman. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2):198, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D.R. Hardoon, S. Szedmak, and J. Shawe-Taylor. Canonical correlation analysis: an overview with application to learning methods. Neural Computation, 16(12):2639--2664, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P.O. Hoyer. Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5:1457--1469, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M.S. Kankanhalli and Y. Rui. Application potential of multimedia information retrieval. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(4):712, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J.R. Kettenring. Canonical analysis of several sets of variables. Biometrika, 58(3):433--451, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D.D. Lee and H.S. Seung. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. X. Li, C. G. M. Snoek, and M.Worring. Learning social tag relevance by neighbor voting. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, in press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. X. Li, C.G.M. Snoek, and M. Worring. Annotating images by harnessing worldwide user-tagged photos. ICASSP. Taipei, Taiwan,2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y.R. Lin, H. Sundaram, M. De Choudhury, and A. Kelliher. Temporal patterns in social media streams: Theme discovery and evolution using joint analysis of content and context. In ICME 2009, pages 1456--1459, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. V. Mardia, J. M. Bibby, and J. T. Kent. Multivariate analysis.Academic Press, New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Marlow, M. Naaman, D. Boyd, and M. Davis. Ht06, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, toread. Proceedings of the seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pages 31--40,2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S.J. Pan and Q. Yang. A survey on transfer learning. Technical Report HKUST-CS08-08, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, HKUST, Hong Kong, China, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Raina, A. Battle, H. Lee, B. Packer, and A.Y. Ng. Self-taught learning: Transfer learning from unlabeled data. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, page 766, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. B.C. Russell, A. Torralba, K.P. Murphy, and W.T. Freeman. Labelme:a database and web-based tool for image annotation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 77(1):157--173, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Salton and C. Buckley. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5):513--523, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. F. Shahnaz, M.W. Berry, V.P. Pauca, and R.J. Plemmons. Document clustering using nonnegative matrix factorization. Information Processing and Management, 42(2):373--386, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Sigurbjörnsson and R. Van Zwol. Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. Proceeding of ACM International World Wide Web Conference, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. Wang, F. Jing, L. Zhang, and H.J. Zhang. Scalable search-based image annotation. Multimedia Systems, 14(4):205--220, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. X. Wang, C. Pal, and A. McCallum. Generalized component analysis for text with heterogeneous attributes. Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, page 803, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. L. Wu, L. Yang, N. Yu, and X.S. Hua. Learning to tag. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 361--370, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Z.Wu, C.W. Cheng, and C. Li. Social and semantics analysis via nonnegative matrix factorization. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Nonnegative shared subspace learning and its application to social media retrieval

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '10: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      July 2010
      1240 pages
      ISBN:9781450300551
      DOI:10.1145/1835804

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 July 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader