skip to main content
research-article

Lower-bounded facility location

Published:03 September 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We study the lower-bounded facility location problem which generalizes the classical uncapacitated facility location problem in that it comes with lower bound constraints for the number of clients assigned to a facility in the case that this facility is opened. This problem was introduced independently in the papers by Karger and Minkoff [2000] and by Guha et al. [2000], both of which give bicriteria approximation algorithms for it. These bicriteria algorithms come within a constant factor of the optimal solution cost, but they also violate the lower bound constraints by a constant factor. Our result in this article is the first true approximation algorithm for the lower-bounded facility location problem which respects the lower bound constraints and achieves a constant approximation ratio for the objective function. The main technical idea for the design of the algorithm is a reduction to the capacitated facility location problem, which has known constant-factor approximation algorithms.

References

  1. Arya, V., Garg, N., Khandekar, R., Meyerson, A., Munagala, K., and Pandit, V. 2004. Local search heuristics for k-median and facility location problems. SIAM J. Comput. 33, 3, 544--562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Byrka, J. 2007. An optimal bifactor approximation algorithm for the metric uncapacitated facility location problem. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization (APPROX). 29--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Charikar, M. and Guha, S. 2005. Improved combinatorial algorithms for facility location problems. SIAM J. Comput. 34, 4, 803--824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chudak, F. and Shmoys, D. 1999. Improved approximation algorithms for a capacitated facility location problem. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 875--876. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chudak, F. and Shmoys, D. 2003. Improved approximation algorithms for the uncapacitated facility location problem. SIAM J. Comput. 33, 1, 1--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chudak, F. and Williamson, D. 2005. Improved approximation algorithms for capacitated facility location problems. Math. Program. 102, 2, 207--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Guha, S., Meyerson, A., and Munagala, K. 2000. Hierarchical placement and network design problems. In Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 603. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Guha, S., Meyerson, A., and Munagala, K. 2001. A constant factor approximation for the single sink edge installation problems. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 383--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hajiaghayi, M. T., Mahdian, M., and Mirrokni, V. S. 2003. The facility location problem with general cost functions. Netw. 42, 42--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jain, K., Mahdian, M., and Saberi, A. 2002. A new greedy approach for facility location problems. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 731--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jain, K. and Vazirani, V. V. 2001. Approximation algorithms for metric facility location and k-median problems using the primal-dual schema and lagrangian relaxation. J. ACM 48, 2, 274--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Karger, D. R. and Minkoff, M. 2000. Building steiner trees with incomplete global knowledge. In Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Korupolu, M. R., Plaxton, C. G., and Rajaraman, R. 2000. Analysis of a local search heuristic for facility location problems. J. Algor. 37, 1, 146--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lim, A., Wang, F., and Xu, Z. 2006. A transportation problem with minimum quantity commitment. Transport. Sci. 40, 1, 117--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mahdian, M. and Pál, M. 2003. Universal facility location. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Algorithms. 409--421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahdian, M., Ye, Y., and Zhang, J. 2003. A 2-approximation algorithm for the soft-capacitated facility location problem. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization (APPROX). 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pal, M., Tardos, E., and Wexler, T. 2001. Facility location with nonuniform hard capacities. In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Shmoys, D. B., Tardos, E., and Aardal, K. 1997. Approximation algorithms for facility location problems. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 265--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sviridenko, M. 2002. An improved approximation algorithm for the metric uncapacitated facility location problem. In Proceedings of the Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (IPCO). 240--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Vygen, J. 2007. From stars to comets: Improved local search for universal facility location. Oper. Res. Lett. 35, 4, 427--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zhang, J., Chen, B., and Ye, Y. 2005. A multiexchange local search algorithm for the capacitated facility location problem. Math. Oper. Res. 30, 2, 389--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Lower-bounded facility location

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
      ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 6, Issue 4
      August 2010
      308 pages
      ISSN:1549-6325
      EISSN:1549-6333
      DOI:10.1145/1824777
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 September 2010
      • Accepted: 1 July 2009
      • Received: 1 February 2009
      Published in talg Volume 6, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader