skip to main content
research-article

Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models

Published:05 January 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The increasing creation of 3D cultural heritage models has resulted in a need for the establishment of centralized digital archives. We advocate open repositories of scientifically authenticated 3D models based on the example of traditional scholarly journals, with standard mechanisms for preservation, peer review, publication, updating, and dissemination of the 3D models. However, fully realizing this vision will require addressing a number of related research challenges.

In this article, we first give a brief background of the virtual heritage discipline, and characterize the need for centralized 3D archives, including a preliminary needs assessment survey of virtual heritage practitioners. Then we describe several existing 3D cultural heritage repositories, and enumerate a number of technical research challenges that should be addressed to realize an ideal archive. These challenges include digital rights management for the 3D models, clear depiction of uncertainty in 3D reconstructions, version control for 3D models, effective metadata structures, long-term preservation, interoperability, and 3D searching. Other concerns are provision for the application of computational analysis tools, and the organizational structure of a peer-reviewed 3D model archive.

References

  1. Arnold, C., Huggett, J., Reilly, P., and Springham, C. 1989. Mathrafal: A case study in the application of computer graphics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Applications in Archaeology (CAA), S. Rahtz and J. Richards, Eds. Vol. 16. 147--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barcelo, J., Forte, M., and Sanders, D., Eds. 2000. Virtual Reality in Archaeology. ArcheoPress, Oxford, UK (British Archaeological Reports, International Series #843).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Biek, L. 1985. LERNIE XIV: Comparology and stereovideo. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Applications in Archaeology (CAA). Vol. 12. 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckland, P. and Wilcock, J. 1973. An experiment in the use of a computer for on-site recording of finds, and the use of remote terminals for archaeological site records. In Proceedings of Computer Applications in Archaeology 1, Science and Archaeology (CAA73). Vol. 9. George Street Press, Stafford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chou, H. and Lim, W. 1986. A unifying framework for version control in a CAD environment. In Proceedings of the 12th International International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'86). 336--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Clark, J. T., Bergstrom, A., Landrum, J., Larson, F., and Slator, B. 2002. Digital archive network for anthropology (DANA): Three-dimensional modeling and database development for Internet access. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Virtual Reality Archeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST'2000). British Archaeological Reports, F. Niccolucci, Ed. Vol. 834.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. CyArk. http://www.cyark.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Digital Hammurabi Project. http://www.jhu.edu/digitalhammurabi/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Feeny, M., Ed. 1999. Digital Culture: Maximising the Nation's Investment. National Preservation Office, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Forte, M. and Siliotti, A. 1997. Virtual Archaeology. Abrams, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Frischer, B. 2003. Mission and recent projects of the UCLA cultural virtual reality laboratory. In Proceedings of the Conference Virtual Retrospect. R. Vergnieux and C. Delevoie, Eds. 65--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Frischer, B. 2008. From digital illustration to digital heuristics. In Beyond Illustration: 2D and 3D Digital Technologies as Tools for Discovery in Archaeology, B. Frischer and A. Dakouri-Hild, Eds. Vol. 1805. BAR International Series, v--xxiv.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Frischer, B., Abernathy, D., Giuliani, F. C., Scott, R., and Ziemssen, H. 2006. A new digital model of the roman forum. J. Roman Arch. Suppl. Series 61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Frischer, B., Niccolucci, F., Ryan, N., and Barcelo, J. 2002. From CVR to CVRO: The past, present, and future of cultural virtual reality. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Virtual Reality Archeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST'00). British Archaeological Reports, F. Niccolucci, Ed. Vol. 834. 7--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Frischer, B. and Stinson, P. 2003. The importance of scientific authentication and a formal visual language in virtual models of archaeological sites: The case of the House of Augustus and the Villa of the Mysteries. In Proceedings of the Ghent Conference on Heritage, Technology, and Local Development. D. Callebaut, Ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Funkhouser, T., Min, P., Kazhdan, M., Chen, J., Halderman, A., Dobkin, D., and Jacobs, D. 2003. A search engine for 3D models. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 1, 83--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Johnson, C. and Sanderson, A. 2003. A next step: Visualizing errors and uncertainty. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 23, 5, 6--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Koller, D. and Levoy, M. 2006. Computer-Aided reconstruction and new matches in the forma urbis romae. Bull. Della Commissione Archeol. Comunale di Roma.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Koller, D., Trimble, J., Najbjerg, T., Gelfand, N., and Levoy, M. 2006. Fragments of the city: Stanford's Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project. J. Roman Archaeol. Suppl. 61, 237--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Koller, D., Turitzin, M., Levoy, M., Tarini, M., Croccia, G., Cignoni, P., and Scopigno, R. 2004. Protected interactive 3D graphics via remote rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3, 695--703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Levoy, M., Pulli, K., Curless, B., Rusinkiewicz, S., Koller, D., Pereira, L., Ginzton, M., Anderson, S., Davis, J., Ginsberg, J., Shade, J., and Fulk, D. 2000. The digital Michelangelo project. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 131--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. London Charter. 2006. The London Charter for the use of 3-dimensional visualisation in the research and communication of cultural heritage. www.londoncharter.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. MacEachren, A. M., Robinson, A., Hopper, S., Gardner, S., Murray, R., Gahegan, M., and Hetzler, E. 2005. Visualizing geospatial uncertainty: What we know and what we need to know. Cart. Geogr. Infor. Sci. 32, 3, 139--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Min, P., Kazhdan, M., and Funkhouser, T. 2004. A comparison of text and shape matching for retrieval of online 3D models. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Digital Libraries. 209--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulrenin, A. and Szauer, A. 2002. The DigiCULT Report. Technological Landscapes for Tomorrow's Cultural Economy. Unlocking the Value of Cultural Heritage. The European Commission, Directorate-General for the Information Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Niederöst, J. 2001. 3D reconstruction and accuracy analysis of historical relief models. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on New Development in Digital Photogrammetry. 34--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohbuchi, R., Mukaiyama, A., and Takahashi, S. 2002. A frequency-domain approach to watermarking 3D shapes. Comput. Graph. Forum 21, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Pang, A. 2001. Visualizing uncertainty in geospatial data. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Intersections Between Geospatial Information and Information Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Paris, C. and Fiedler, M., Eds. 2005. Protection of stored data by system level encryption schemes. EuroNGI Deliverable D.WP.JRA.6.3.5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Praun, E., Hoppe, H., and Finkelstein, A. 1999. Robust mesh watermarking. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Rosenthal, D. S. and Reich, V. 2000. Permanent Web publishing. In Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Freenix Track. 129--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sanders, D. 2006. Personal communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shiaw, H., Jacob, R. J. K., and Crane, G. R. 2004. The 3D vase museum: A new approach to context in a digital library. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. 125--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Strothotte, T., Masuch, M., and Isenberg, T. 1999. Visualizing knowledge about virtual reconstructions of ancient architecture. In Proceedings of the Computer Graphics International Conferences. 34--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tangelder, J. and Veltkamp, R. 2004. A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods. In Proceedings of Shape Modeling Applications Conference. 145--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. TurboSquid. http://www.turbosquid.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Vergauwen, M. and Gool, L. V. 2006. Web-Based 3D reconstruction service. Mach. Vis. Appl. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Verykios, V., Bertino, E., Fovino, I., Provenza, L., Saygin, Y., and Theodoridis, Y. 2004. State-of-the-Art in privacy preserving data mining. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 3, 1, 50--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Zhang, L., Tong, R., Su, F., and Dong, J. 2002. A mesh watermarking approach for appearance attributes. In Proceedings of Pacific Graphics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Zuk, T., Carpendale, S., and Glanzman, W. 2005. Visualizing temporal uncertainty in 3D virtual reconstructions. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST'05). 99--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
      Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 2, Issue 3
      December 2009
      37 pages
      ISSN:1556-4673
      EISSN:1556-4711
      DOI:10.1145/1658346
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 January 2010
      • Accepted: 1 July 2008
      • Received: 1 January 2007
      Published in jocch Volume 2, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader