skip to main content
10.1145/1620545.1620578acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SwimMaster: a wearable assistant for swimmer

Published:30 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we introduce the concept of a wearable assistant for swimmer, called SwimMaster. The SwimMaster consists of acceleration sensors with micro-controllers and feedback interface modules that swimmer wear while swimming. With four different evaluation studies and a total of 22 subjects we demonstrate the functionality and power of the SwimMaster system. We show how a wide range of swim parameters can be monitored and used for a continuous swim performance evaluation. These parameters include the time per lane, the swimming velocity and the number of strokes per lane. Also swim style specific factors like the body balance and the body rotation are extracted. Finally three feedback modalities are tested and evaluated. With these means we show the ability of the SwimMaster to assist a swimmer in achieving the desired exercise goals by constantly monitoring his/her swim performance and providing the necessary feedback to achieve the desired workout goals.

References

  1. R. Anderson, A. Harrison, and G.M. Lyons. Accelerometry-based feedback -- can it improve movement consistency and performance in rowing? Sports Biomechanics, 4(2):179--195, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. B. Auvinet, E. Gloria, G. Renault, and E. Barrey. Runner's stride analysis: comparison of kinematic and kinetic analyses under field conditions. Science&Sports 2002, 17:92--4, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Bächlin, D. Roggen, and G. Tröster. Context-aware platform for long-term life style management and medical signal analysis. In Proceedings of the 2nd Sensation International Conference, Chania, Greece, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Bannach, K. Kunze, P. Lukowicz, and O. Amft. Distributed modular toolbox for multi-modal context recognition. In ARCS 2006: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Architecture of Computing Systems., pages 99--113, March 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Beetz, B. Kirchlechner, and M. Lames. Computerized real-time analysis of football games. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(3):33--39, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Beetz, N.v. Hoyningen-Huene, J. Bandouch, B. Kirchlechner, S. Gedikli, and A. Maldonado. Camera-based observation of football games for analyzing multi-agent activities. In AAMAS '06: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 42--49, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A.J. Callaway. A comparison of video and accelerometer based approaches applied to performance monitoring in swimming. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 4:139--153(15), March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R. Chan. Swimming lap counter, December 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A.J. Craig and D. Pendergast. Relationships of stroke rate, distance per stroke, and velocity in competitive swimming. Med Sci Sports, 11(3):278--83, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N.P. Davey, M.E. Anderson, and D.A. James. An accelerometer-based system for elite athlete swimming performance analysis. volume 5649, pages 409--415. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Förster, M. Bächlin, and G. Tröster. Non-interrupting user interfaces for electronic body-worn swim devices. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, June 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Hey and S. Carter. Pervasive computing in sports training. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 4(3):54--, July-Sept. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. James, N. Davey, and T. Rice. An accelerometer based sensor platform for insitu elite athlete performance analysis. Sensors, 2004. Proceedings of IEEE, pages 1373--1376 vol.3, 24-27 Oct. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. G.J. Maw and S. Volkers. Measurement and application of stroke dynamics during training in your own pool. Australian Swim. Coach, 12(3):34--38, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. F. Michahelles and B. Schiele. Sensing and monitoring professional skiers. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4(3):40--46, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Y. Ohgi. Microcomputer-based acceleration sensor device for sports biomechanics -- stroke evaluation by using swimmer's wrist acceleration. Sensors, 2002. Proceedings of IEEE, 1:699--704, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. D. Roggen, N.B. Bharatula, M. Stäger, P. Lukowicz, and G. Tröster. From sensors to miniature networked sensorbuttons. In In Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS06), pages 119--122, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S.E. Slawson, L.M. Justham, A.A. West, P.P. Conway, M.P. Caine, and R. Harrison. Accelerometer profile recognition of swimming strokes. The Engineering of Sport, 7:81--87, Aug. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Tarpinian. The Triathlete's Guide to Swim Training. VeloPress, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SwimMaster: a wearable assistant for swimmer

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp '09: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
          September 2009
          292 pages
          ISBN:9781605584317
          DOI:10.1145/1620545

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 September 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          UbiComp '09 Paper Acceptance Rate31of251submissions,12%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader