skip to main content
10.1145/1571941.1571970acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Brute force and indexed approaches to pairwise document similarity comparisons with MapReduce

Published:19 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the problem of computing pairwise similarity on document collections, focusing on the application of "more like this" queries in the life sciences domain. Three MapReduce algorithms are introduced: one based on brute force, a second where the problem is treated as large-scale ad hoc retrieval, and a third based on the Cartesian product of postings lists. Each algorithm supports one or more approximations that trade effectiveness for efficiency, the characteristics of which are studied experimentally. Results show that the brute force algorithm is the most efficient of the three when exact similarity is desired. However, the other two algorithms support approximations that yield large efficiency gains without significant loss of effectiveness.

References

  1. A. Andoni and P. Indyk. Near-optimal hashing algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor in high dimensions. CACM, 51(1):117--122, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. V. Anh, O. de Kretser, and A. Moffat. Vector-space ranking with effective early termination. In SIGIR, 35--42, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Bayardo, Y. Ma, and R. Srikant. Scaling up all pairs similarity search. In WWW, 131--140, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. In OSDI, 137--150, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Elsayed, J. Lin, and D. Oard. Pairwise document similarity in large collections with MapReduce. In ACL, Companion Volume, 265--268, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Ghemawat, H. Gobioff, and S.-T. Leung. The Google File System. In SOSP, 29--43, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. Hersh, A. Cohen, J. Yang, R. Bhupatiraju, P. Roberts, and M. Hearst. TREC 2005 Genomics Track overview. In TREC, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. N. Lester, A. Moffat, W. Webber, and J. Zobel. Space-limited ranked query evaluation using adaptive pruning. In WISE, 470--477, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Lin and M. Smucker. How do users find things with PubMed? Towards automatic utility evaluation with user simulations. In SIGIR, 19--26, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Lin and W. J. Wilbur. PubMed related articles: A probabilistic topic-based model for content similarity. BMC Bioinformatics, 8:423, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Moffat and J. Zobel. Self-indexing inverted files for fast text retrieval. ACM TOIS, 14(4):349--379, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Persin, J. Zobel, and R. Sacks-Davis. Filtered document retrieval with frequency-sorted indexes. JASIS, 47(10):749--764, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. T. Strohman and W. Croft. Efficient document retrieval in main memory. In SIGIR, 175--182, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I. Witten, A. Moffat, and T. Bell. Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In SIGIR, 334--342, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Brute force and indexed approaches to pairwise document similarity comparisons with MapReduce

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '09: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
      July 2009
      896 pages
      ISBN:9781605584836
      DOI:10.1145/1571941

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 July 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader