skip to main content
10.1145/1556460.1556484acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Overhearing the crowd: an empirical examination of conversation reuse in a technical support community

Published:25 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a mixed method, empirical analysis of conversation reuse in an online technical support community. I find that the same characteristics that make the conversation successful (its highly personal, immediate, and socially engaging nature) make reuse of the conversation problematic. The archived discussion and wiki are reused to satisfy an immediate need, while the ongoing conversation is reused to help learn the practice. Use of the discussion archive and wiki repository are compared, showing benefits of the decontextualized, distilled wiki content for reuse. Implications of the findings on the design of "reuser friendly" tools and strategies are discussed.

References

  1. Ackerman, M. S. and Halverson, C. 2004. Organizational Memory as Objects, Processes, and Trajectories: An Examination of Organizational Memory in Use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 13, 2, 155--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ackerman, M. S. and Malone, T. W. 1990. Answer Garden: a tool for growing organizational memory. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOIS and IEEE CS TC--OA Conference on office information Systems (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, April 25 -- 27, 1990). F. H. Lochovsky and R. B. Allen, Eds. ACM, New York, NY, 31--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ackerman, M. S. and McDonald, D. W. 1996. Answer Garden 2: merging organizational memory with collaborative help. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Boston, Massachusetts, United States, November 16 -- 20, 1996). M. S. Ackerman, Ed. CSCW '96. ACM, New York, NY, 97--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ackerman, M. S., Swenson, A., Cotterill, S., and DeMaagd, K. 2003. I--DIAG: from community discussion to knowledge distillation. In Communities and Technologies, M. Huysman, E. Wenger, and V. Wulf, Eds. Kluwer B.V., Deventer, The Netherlands, 307--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anderson, J. R. 2004. Chapter 9: Expertise. In Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (6th ed.). Worth Publishers, New York, NY, 279--311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer, R. S. 2000. Improving problem-oriented mailing list archives with MCS. In Proceedings of the 22nd international Conference on Software Engineering (Limerick, Ireland, June 04 -- 11, 2000). ICSE '00. ACM, New York, NY, 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Burnett, G. 2000. Informational exchange in virtual communities: A typology. Information Research, 5, 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W.A. Knowledge communities: Online environments for supporting knowledge management and its social context. In Sharing Expertise: Beyond knowledge management (Eds. Ackerman, Pipek, Wulf). MIT Press, 2003, 299--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen, D. L. 2007. Knowledge sharing, maintenance, and use in online support communities. Doctoral dissertation, School of Information, University of Michigan. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/57608 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hansen, D. L., Ackerman, M. S., Resnick, P. J., Munson, S. Virtual Community Maintenance with a Collaborative Repository. In Proceedings of the American Society of Information Science and Technology -- Volume 44, Issue 1. ASIST 2007. ASIST, Silver Spring, MD, 1--20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lakhani, K. R., and von Hippel, E. 2003. How open source software works: "free" user-to-user assistance. Research policy, 32, 6, 923--943.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Maloney-Krichmar, D. and Preece, J. 2005. A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2 (Jun. 2005), 201--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Markus, M. L. 2001. Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success. J Manage Inform Syst, 18, 1, 57--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Millen, D. R. 2000. Community Portals and Collective Goods: Conversation Archives as an Information Resource. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii international Conference on System Sciences -- Volume 3 (January 04 -- 07, 2000). HICSS. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 3030. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nam, K. K. and Ackerman, M. S. 2007. Arkose: reusing informal information from online discussions. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, November 04 -- 07, 2007). GROUP '07. ACM, New York, NY, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Orlikowski, W. J., and Yates, J. 1994. Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations. ADMIN SCI QUART, 39, 4, 541--547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., and Riedl, J. 1994. GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, October 22 -- 26, 1994). CSCW '94. ACM, New York, NY, 175--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Smith, M. A. and Fiore, A. T. 2001. Visualization components for persistent conversations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, United States). CHI '01. ACM, New York, NY, 136--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Taylor, R. 1968. Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. Coll Res Libr 29, 178--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Zhang, J., Ackerman, M. S., and Adamic, L. 2007. Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. In Proceedings of the 16th international Conference on World Wide Web (Banff, Alberta, May 08 -- 12, 2007). WWW'07. ACM, New York, NY, 221--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Overhearing the crowd: an empirical examination of conversation reuse in a technical support community

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          C&T '09: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies
          June 2009
          306 pages
          ISBN:9781605587134
          DOI:10.1145/1556460
          • General Chair:
          • John M. Carroll

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 June 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate46of117submissions,39%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader