skip to main content
10.1145/1542362.1542390acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cut locus and topology from surface point data

Published:08 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

A cut locus of a point p in a compact Riemannian manifold M is defined as the set of points where minimizing geodesics issued from p stop being minimizing. It is known that a cut locus contains most of the topological information of M. Our goal is to utilize this property of cut loci to decipher the topology of M from a point sample. Recently it has been shown that Rips complexes can be built from a point sample P of M systematically to compute the Betti numbers, the rank of the homology groups of M. Rips complexes can be computed easily and therefore are favored over others such as restricted Delaunay, alpha, Cech, and witness complex. However, the sizes of the Rips complexes tend to be large. Since the dimension of a cut locus is lower than that of the manifold M, a subsample of P approximating the cut locus is usually much smaller in size and hence admits a relatively smaller Rips complex. In this paper we explore the above approach for point data sampled from surfaces embedded in any high dimensional Euclidean space. We present an algorithm that computes a subsample P' of a sample P of a 2-manifold where P' approximates a cut locus. Empirical results show that the first Betti number of M can be computed from the Rips complexes built on these subsamples. The sizes of these Rips complexes are much smaller than the one built on the original sample of M.

References

  1. . Belkin, P. Niyogi.Towards a Theoretical Foundation for Laplacian Based Manifold Methods. J. Comput. System Sci., to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Bernstein, V. de Silva, J. Langford, and J. Tenenbaum. Graphapproximations to geodesics on embedded manifolds. Tech Report,Dept. Psychology, Stanford University, USA, 2000.Available at http://isomap.stanford.edu/BdSLT.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. .-D. Boissonnat, L. J. Guibas, and S. Y. Oudot.Manifold reconstruction in arbitrary dimensions usingwitness complexes. Proc. 23rd Ann. Sympos. Comput. Geom.(2007), 194--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. . A. Buchner. Simplicial structure of the realanalytic cut locus. Proc. American Math. Soc. 64 (1977), 118--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. . Chazal and A. Lieutier. Topology guaranteeingmanifold reconstruction using distance function to noisy data. Proc. 22nd Ann. Sympos. Comput. Geom. (2006), 112--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. . Chazal and A. Lieutier. The lambda-medial axis. Graphical Models 67 (2006), 304--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. . Chazal and S. Oudot. Towards persistence-based reconstruction in Euclidean spaces. Proc. 24th Ann. Sympos.Comput. Geom. (2008), 232--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. . W. Chambers, J. Erickson,and P. Worah. Testing contractibility in planar Rips complexes Proc. 24th Ann. ACM Sympos. Comput. Geom. (2008), 251--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. . Chavel. Riemannian Geometry: A ModernIntroduction. Cambridge U. Press, New York, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. .-W. Cheng, T. K. Dey, and E. A. Ramos.Manifold reconstruction from point samples. Proc. 16th Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2005), 1018--1027. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. . Cohen-Steiner, H. Edelsbrunner, and J. Harer. Stability of persistence diagrams. Discrete Comput. Geom. 37 (2007), 103--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Colin de Verdière and J. Erickson.Tightening non-simple paths and cycles on surfaces. Proc. ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2006), 192--201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. . K. Dey and K. Li. Topology from data via geodesic complexes. Tech report OSU-CISRC-3/09-TR05, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. . P. do Carmo. Riemannian geometry. Birkhauser, Boston, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. . Edelsbrunner, D. Letscher, and A. Zomorodian. Topological persistence and simplification. Discrete Comput. Geom. 28 (2002), 511--533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. . Erickson and K. Whittlesey. Greedy optimal homotopy and homology generators. Proc. ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2005), 1038--1046. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. . Federer. Curvature measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1959), 418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. . Gao, L. J. Guibas, S. Y. Oudot, and Y. Wang. Geodesic Delaunay triangulations and witness complexes in the plane. Proc. ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2008), 571--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. . Hildebrandt, K. Polthier, and M. Wardetzky.On the convergence of metric and geometric properties of polyhedral surfaces. Geometriae Dedicata 123 (2006), 89--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. . T. Jollife. Principal Component Analysis.Springer series in statistics, Springer, NY, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. . P. A. Klingenberg. Riemannian Geometry.Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. . B. Myers. Connections between differential geometryand topology I: Simply connected surfaces. Duke Math. J. 1 (1935), 376--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. . B. Myers. Connections between differential geometry and topology II: Closed surfaces. Duke Math. J. 2 (1936), 95--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. P. Niyogi, S. Smale, and S. Weinberger.Finding the homology of submanifolds withhigh confidence from random samples. Discrete Comput. Geom. (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. . de Silva and G. Carlsson. Topological estimation using witness complexes. Proc. Sympos. Point-Based Graph.(2004), 157--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. . B. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva, and J. C. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290 (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. . Zomorodian and G. Carlsson. Computing persistent homology. Discr. Comput. Geom. 33 (2005), 249--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Cut locus and topology from surface point data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SCG '09: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual symposium on Computational geometry
      June 2009
      426 pages
      ISBN:9781605585017
      DOI:10.1145/1542362

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader