skip to main content
10.1145/1531674.1531680acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Spreading the honey: a system for maintaining an online community

Published:10 May 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

As online communities, such as social network sites, mature, they face challenges in sustaining user engagement. To address this, we designed and deployed a rating system to encourage a broad set of users to promote a diverse set of content on a social network site. By evaluating the impact of the promotions on the site's content and users over time, we found that the system successfully promotes more diverse content and encourages new social interactions between users.

References

  1. Wikipedia: Administrators, 2008, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A. and Mishne, G., Finding High-Quality Content in Social Media. In Proceedings of WSDM'08 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Beenen, G., Ling, K., Wang, X., Chang, K., Frankowski,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D., Resnick, P. and Kraut, R.E., Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2004), 212--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buriol, L.S., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Leonardi, S. and Millozzi, S., Temporal Analysis of the Wikigraph. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (2006), 45--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cheng, R. and Vassileva, J. Design and Evaluation of an Adaptive Incentive Mechanism for Sustained Educational Online Communities. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, Special Issue on User Modelling Supporting Collaboration and Online Communities, 16, 2/3 (2006), 321--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chi, Y., Zhu, S., Song, X., Tatemura, J. and Tsneg, B.L., Structural and temporal analysis of the blogosphere through community factorization. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD (2007), 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Kiesler, S., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J., How oversight improves member-maintained communities. In Proceedings of CHI '05 (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B. and Muller, M., Motivations for Social Networking at Work. In Proceedings of CSCW '08 (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Farzan, R., DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R., Brownholtz, B., Geyer, W. and Dugan, C., When the experiment is over: Deploying an incentive system to all the users. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Persuasive Technology, In conjunction with the AISB 2008 Convention (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Geyer, W., Dugan, C., DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R., Brownholtz, B. and Muller, M., Use and Reuse of Shared Lists as a Social Content Type. In Proceedings of CHI '08(2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Harper, F., Li, X., Chen, Y. and Konstan, J., Social Comparisons to Motivate Contributions to an Online Community. In Proceedings of Persuasive Technology (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jones, Q., Ravid G., and Rafaeli S. (2001) Information Overload and Virtual Public Discourse Boundaries. In Proceedings of INTERACT, Eighth IFIP TC.13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Tokyo, Japan IOS PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lampe, C. and Resnick, P., Slash(dot) and Burn: Distributed Moderation in a Large Online Conversation Space. In Proceedings of CHI '04 (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Locke, E.A. and G.P. Latham, Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35 year odyssey. American Psychologist, 2002. 57(9): p. 705--717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. McLure Wasko, M. and Faraj, S. (2000) "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9, pp 155--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Malda, R. Slashdot FAQ: Comments and Moderation, 2003, http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success. Behaviour and Information Technology. 20:5, 347--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Rashid, A.M., Ling, K., Tassone, R.D., Resnick, P., Kraut, R. and Riedl, J., Motivating Participation by Displaying the Value of Contribution. In Proceedings of CHI '06 (2006), 955--958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Schoberth, T., Preece, J., Heinzl, A. (2003) Online Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis of Communication Activities. In Proceedings of the Thirty-sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE PressGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Thom-Santelli, J. and Millen, D. R. Learning by seeing: photo viewing in the workplace. In Proceedings of CHI 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Spreading the honey: a system for maintaining an online community

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GROUP '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
      May 2009
      412 pages
      ISBN:9781605585000
      DOI:10.1145/1531674

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 May 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      GROUP '09 Paper Acceptance Rate40of110submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader