skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529529acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterizing 1-dof Henneberg-I graphs with efficient configuration spaces

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We define and study exact, efficient representations of realization spaces of a natural class of underconstrained 2D Euclidean Distance constraint systems (Linkages or Frameworks) based on 1-dof Henneberg-I graphs. Each representation corresponds to a choice of parameters and yields a different parametrized configuration space. Our notion of efficiency is based on the algebraic complexities of sampling the configuration space and of obtaining a realization from the sample (parametrized) configuration. Significantly, we give purely combinatorial characterizations that capture (i) the class of graphs that have efficient configuration spaces and (ii) the possible choices of representation parameters that yield efficient configuration spaces for a given graph. Our results automatically yield an efficient algorithm for sampling realizations, without missing extreme or boundary realizations. In addition, our results formally show that our definition of efficient configuration space is robust and that our characterizations are tight. We choose the class of 1-dof Henneberg-I graphs in order to take the next step in a systematic and graded program of combinatorial characterizations of efficient configuration spaces. In particular, the results presented here are the first characterizations that go beyond graphs that have connected and convex configuration spaces.

References

  1. I. Fudos and C. M. Hoffmann. A graph-constructive approach to solving systems of geometric constraints. ACM Trans on Graphics, Page: 179--216, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. H. Gao. Geometric Under-Constraints. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Gao, and M. Sitharam. Combinatorial Classification of 2D Underconstrained Sytems. Proceedings of the Seventh Asian Symposium on Computer Mathematics (ASCM 2005), Sung-il. Pae. and Hyungju. Park., Eds., 2005, Page 118--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Gao and M. Sitharam. Characterizing 1-Dof Henneberg-I graphs with efficient configuration spaces. arXiv: 0810.1997 {cs.CG}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Gao and M. Sitharam. Characterizing 1-Dof Tree-Decomposable graphs with efficient configuration space. In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Robert Joan-Arinyo and Antoni Soto-Riera and S. Vila-Marta and Josep Vilaplana-Pasto. Transforming an under-constrained geometric constraint problem into a well-constrained one. Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications 2003, pages 33--44, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hilderick A. van der Meiden, Willem F. Bronsvoort. A constructive approach to calculate parameter ranges for systems of geometric constraints. Computer-Aided Design, 38(4): 275--283, 2006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. John C. Owen and Steve C. Power. The nonsolvability by radicals of generic 3-connected planar graphs. Transactions of AMS, 359(5): 2269--2303, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Sitharam. Graph based geometric constraint solving: problems, progress and directions. AMS-DIMACS volume on Computer Aided Design, D. Dutta, R. Janardhan, and M. Smid, Eds., 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Sitharam and H. Gao. Characterizing graphs with convex and connected configuration spaces. arXiv: 0809.3935 {cs.CG}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. G. F. Zhang and X. S. Gao. Well-constrained Completion and Decomposition for Under-constrained Geometric Constraint Problems. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications, pages 461--478, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing 1-dof Henneberg-I graphs with efficient configuration spaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader