ABSTRACT
The cutting edge in the digital arts is a highly fertile ground for the investigation of engagement and the role of new technologies. The nature of audience interaction with artworks and the implication for the consequential nature of the interactive art system is itself important. This paper examines the process of experience evaluation of interactive art and its role in improving design of interactive art systems. The experience evaluation was based upon the case-study of an interactive artwork entitled GEO Landscapes .01 -- a gallery installation prototype which commenced development in 2006 and was exhibited in a public space in 2007. The experience evaluation study demonstrated how the novice versus expert profiles of interaction behaviours influenced the nature of the artwork experience. The research findings improved our understanding of how people experience artworks and also had an impact on the experience design of GEO Landscapes and the future direction of the project.
- Benford, S., Crabtree, A., Reeves, S., Sheridan, J., Dix, A., Flintham, M. and Drozd, A., 2006 The Frame of the Game: Blurring the Boundary between Fiction and Reality in Mobile Experiences. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, (Montréal, Québec, Canada 2006), ACM, 427--436 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bilda, Z., 2006 Evaluating Audience Experience. in Engage: Interaction, Art and Audience Experience, (Australia, 2006), Creativity and Cognition Studios Press, 248--260Google Scholar
- Bilda, Z., Candy, L. and Edmonds, E. A. 2007 An Embodied Cognition Framework for Interactive Experience. CoDesign, 3 (2). 123--137Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bilda, Z., Costello, B. and Amitani, S. 2006 Collaborative analysis framework for evaluating interactive art experience. CoDesign, 2 (4). 238--255.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Candy, L., Amitani, S. and Bilda, Z. 2006 Practice-Led Strategies for Interactive Art Research. CoDesign: International Journal of Co Creation in Design and the Arts, 3 (4). 209--223.Google Scholar
- Cornock, S. and Edmonds, E. A. 1973 The Creative process where the artist is amplified or superseded by the computer. Leonardo, 6. 11--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Costello, B., Muller, L., Amitani, S. and Edmonds, E. A., 2005 Understanding the Experience of Interactive Art: Iamascope in Beta_Space. in Interactive Entertainment, (Sydney, Australia, 2005), Creativity & Cognition Studios Press, 49--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edmonds, E. A., Muller, L. and Turnbull, D. (eds.). Engage: Interaction, Art and Audience Experience. Creativity and Cognition Studios Press, Sydney, Australia, 2006.Google Scholar
- Edmonds, E. A., Weakley, A. J., Candy, L., Fell, M. J., Knott, R. P. and Pauletto, S. 2005 The Studio as Laboratory: Combining Creative Practice and Digital Technology Research. Int. Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63 (4--5). 452--481. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, W. W., 1991 Technology Affordances. in Proceedings of the ACM CHI 91 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, (1991), ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. 2002 The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13 (4). 481--499.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heath, C., Luff, P., Lehn, D. V., Hindmarsh, J. and Celverly, J. 2002 Crafting participation: designing ecologies, configuring experience. Visual Communication, 1 (1). 9--33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hook, K., Sengers, P. and Andersson, G., 2003 Sense and sensibility: Evaluation and interactive art. in CHI: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 2003), ACM, 241--248. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Muller, L. and Edmonds, E. A., 2006 Living Laboratories: Making and Curating Interactive Art. in SIGGRAPH 2006 Electronic Art and Animation Catalog, (New York, 2006), ACM press, 160--163. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Norman, D. A. The Design of Everyday Things. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1993.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. A. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
- Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C. and Fraser, M. 2005 Designing the spectator experience CHI 2005, ACM, Portland, Oregon, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schnadelbach, H., Egglestone, S. R., Reeves, S., Benford, S., Walker, B. and Wright, M. 2008 Performing Thrill: Designing Telemetry Systems and Spectator Interfaces for Amusement Rides CHI 2008, ACM, Florence, Italy. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tractinsky, N., Adi, S.-K. and Ikar, D. 2000 What is Beautiful is Usable. Interacting with Computers, 13 (2). 127--145.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wright, P. C., McCarthy, J. C. and Meekison, L. Making Sense Of Experience. in Blythe, M. A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A. F. and Wright, P. eds. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhang, Y. and Candy, L., 2007 An in-depth case study of art-technology collaboration. in Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition, (Washington DC, 2007), ACM Press, 53--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Experience evaluation of interactive art: study of GEO landscapes
Recommendations
Understanding the experience of interactive art: Iamascope in Beta_space
IE '05: Proceedings of the second Australasian conference on Interactive entertainmentThis paper describes a study into the situated experience of interactive art. The study was conducted with audiences of the artwork Iamascope and is framed by the four categories of embodied experience that have been proposed by its artist Sidney Fels. ...
Revisiting Interactive Art from an Interaction Design Perspective: Opening a Research Agenda
IHC '18: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe articulation of art and science has been an important source of innovation and groundbreaking contributions in many domains throughout history. In this paper, we revisit the concept of interactive art, from an interaction design perspective, aiming ...
Interactive experience in a public context
C&C '07: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognitionIn this demonstration, we show an interactive artwork that responds to sound and describe a field study evaluating audience engagement within a public context. Audience in the public setting largely recognized the interactivity of the media immediately, ...
Comments