skip to main content
10.1145/1347390.1347420acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inquiring materials for tangible prototyping

Published:18 February 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

As TUI research moves from technical to empirical studies which explore theoretical claims, it is important for researchers to be able to quickly and easily build low fidelity (lo-fi) prototypes to explore the unique features of interaction that TUIs offer. Currently, the best practices for choosing prototyping materials are vague at best. In this paper, I present an analysis of the role of materials in inquiry and propose a set of criteria for evaluating the suitability of lo-fi prototyping materials.

References

  1. Blackwell, A., Edge, D., Dubuc, L., Rode, J. A. Stringer, M. and Toye, E. Using solid diagrams for tangible user interface prototyping. Pervasive Computing, Oct-Dec, (2005), 64--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Clark, A. Beyond the flesh. Artificial Life. 11, 1--2, (2005), 233--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dewey J & Bentley A F. Knowing and the Known. Beacon Press, Boston, MA, USA, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gedenryd, H. How designers work - Making sense of authentic cognitive activities. PhD-thesis at Lund University, 1998. http://www.asip.lucs.lu.se/People/Henrik.Gedenryd/HowDesignersWork/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Greenberg, S. Rapid prototyping of physical user interfaces. In Proc. of Graphics Interface 2002, May, ACM Press and Morgan-Kaufmann (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hartmann, B., Klemmer, S., Bernstein, M., Abdulla, L., Burr, B., Robinson-Mosher, A and Gee, J. Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test and analysis. In Proc. User Interface Software and Technology 2006, ACM Press (2006), 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Klemmer, S., Li, J., Lin, J. Landay, J. Papier-Mâché: Toolkit support for tangible input. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 399--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. McCurdy, M., Connors, C., Pyrzak, G., Kanefsky, B., and Vera, A. Breaking the fidelity barrier: An examination of our current characterization of prototypes and an example of a mixed-fidelity success. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1233--1242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rettig, M. Prototyping for tiny fingers. Communications of the ACM, 37, 4, ACM Press (1994), 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic, Books, New York, NY, USA, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Inquiring materials for tangible prototyping

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEI '08: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction
      February 2008
      267 pages
      ISBN:9781605580043
      DOI:10.1145/1347390

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 February 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader