skip to main content
10.1145/1274871.1274885acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnparConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Using NPR to evaluate perceptual shape cues in dynamic environments

Published:04 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a psychophysical experiment to determine the effectiveness of perceptual shape cues for rigidly moving objects in an interactive, highly dynamic task. We use standard non-photorealistic (NPR) techniques to carefully separate and study shape cues common to many rendering systems. Our experiment is simple to implement, engaging and intuitive for participants, and sensitive enough to detect significant differences between individual shape cues. We demonstrate our experimental design with a user study. In that study, participants are shown 16 moving objects, 4 of which are designated targets, rendered in different shape-from-X styles. Participants select targets projected onto a touch-sensitive table. We find that simple Lambertian shading offers the best shape cue in our user study, followed by contours and, lastly, texturing. Further results indicate that multiple shape cues should be used with care, as these may not behave additively.

References

  1. Barfield, W., Sandford, J., and Foley, J. 1988. The mental rotation and perceived realism of computer-generated three-dimensional images. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies 29, 669--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Biederman, I., and Gerhardstein, P. C. 1993. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional view-point invariance. Experimental Psychology 19, 6, 1162--1182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Biederman, I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94, 2, 115--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bremer, D., and Hughes, J. 1998. Rapid approximate silhouette rendering of implicit surfaces. Implicit Surfaces '98, 155--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bülthoff, H. H., and Mallot, H. A. 1990. Integration of stereo, shading and texture. In AI and the Eye, A. Blake and T. Troscianko, Eds. 119--146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, M., Klawe, J., Rusinkiewicz, S., Finkelstein, A., and DeCarlo, D. 2005. Line drawings from volume data. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3, 512--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cumming, B., Johnston, E., and Parker, A. 1993. Effects of different texture cues on curved surfaces viewed stereoscopically. Vision Research 33, 5--6, 827--838.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. DeCarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2004. Interactive rendering of suggestive contours with temporal coherence. In NPAR '04, 15--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ebert, D., and Rheingans, P. 2000. Volume illustration: non-photorealistic rendering of volume models. In VIS '00: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '00, IEEE Computer Society Press, 195--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gibson, J. J. 1950. The perception of the visible world. American Journal of Psychology 63, 367--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Girshick, A., Interrante, V., Haker, S., and Lemoine, T. 2000. Line direction matters: an argument for the use of principal directions in 3D line drawings. In NPAR '00, 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gooch, A. A., and Willemsen, P. 2002. Evaluating space perception in NPR immersive environments. In NPAR '02, 105--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Goodale, M., Milner, A., Jakobson, L., and Carey, D. 1991. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349, 6305, 154--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertzmann, A. 1999. Introduction to 3D non-photorealistic rendering: Silhouettes and outlines. In Non-Photorealistic Rendering (Siggraph '99 Course Notes).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Interrante, V. 1997. Illustrating surface shape in volume data via principal direction-driven 3D line integral convolution. In SIGGRAPH '97, 109--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Johnston, A., and Passmore, P. J. 1994. Shape from shading. i: Surface curvature and orientation. Perception 23, 169--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kim, S., Hagh-Shenas, H., and Interrante, V. 2004. Conveying three-dimensional shape with texture. In APGV '04, ACM Press, 119--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Koenderink, J. J., and Doorn, A. J. V. 1995. Relief: Pictorial and otherwise. Image and Vision Computing, 321--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Koenderink, J. J. 1984. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception 13, 321--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lu, Z.-L., Lesmes, L. A., and Sperling, G. 1999. The mechanism of isoluminant chromatic motion perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Science USA 96, 14, 8289--8294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Messing, R., and Durgin, F. H. 2005. Distance perception and the visual horizon in head-mounted displays. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2, 3, 234--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., and Phillips, F. 1995. The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of information. Perception and Psychophysics 57, 5, 629--636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Plantinga, S., and Vegter, G. 2003. Contour generators of evolving implicit surfaces. In SM '03: Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications, ACM Press, 23--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Plumert, J. M., Kearney, J. K., Cremer, J. F., and Recker, K. 2005. Distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percpt. 2, 3, 216--233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Rock, I., and DiVita, J. 1987. A case of viewer-centered perception. Cognitive Psychology 19, 280--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ryan, T., and Schwartz, C. 1956. Speed of perception as a function of mode of representation. American Journal of Psychology 69, 1 (March), 60--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Strothotte, T., and Schlechtweg, S. 2002. Non-Photorealistic Computer Graphics: Modeling, Rendering, and Animation. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sunghee, K., Hagh-Shenas, H., and Interrante, V. 2003. Conveying shape with texture: An experimental investigation of the impact of texture type on shape categorization judgments. 2003 IEEE Symposium on Info. Vis., 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sweet, G., and Ware, C. 2004. View direction, surface orientation and texture orientation for perception of surface shape. In GI '04: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Graphics interface, 97--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yuille, J. C., and Steiger, J. H. 1982. Nonholistic processing in mental rotation: Some suggestive evidence. Perception & Psychophysics 31, 3, 201--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zeki, S. 1993. A vision of the brain. Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeki, S. 1999. Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using NPR to evaluate perceptual shape cues in dynamic environments

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            NPAR '07: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on Non-photorealistic animation and rendering
            August 2007
            157 pages
            ISBN:9781595936240
            DOI:10.1145/1274871

            Copyright © 2007 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 4 August 2007

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader