ABSTRACT
Designing collaborative interfaces for tabletops remains difficult because we do not fully understand how groups coordinate their actions when working collaboratively over tables. We present two observational studies of pairs completing independent and shared tasks that investigate collaborative coupling, or the manner in which collaborators are involved and occupied with each other's work. Our results indicate that individuals frequently and fluidly engage and disengage with group activity through several distinct, recognizable states with unique characteristics. We describe these states and explore the consequences of these states for tabletop interface design.
- Baker, K., Greenberg, S., and Gutwin, C. Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In Proc. CSCW 2002, ACM Press (2002), 96--105. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Google Earth. http://earth.google.com/.Google Scholar
- Gutwin, C., and Greenberg, S. A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 3-4, (2002), 411--466. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. Design for individuals, design for groups: tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. In Proc. CSCW 1998, ACM Press (1998), 207--216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S. The effects of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. ACM ToCHI, 6, 3, (1999), 243--281. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hancock, M. and Carpendale, S. The complexities of computer-supported collaboration. Technical report 2006-812-05, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, (2006).Google Scholar
- Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S. D., and Greenberg, S. How people use orientation on tables: comprehension, coordination and communication. In Proc. GROUP 2003, ACM Press (2003), 369--378. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, M. R., Ryall, K., Shen, C., Forlines, C., and Vernier, F. Beyond "social protocols": multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware. In Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM Press (2004), 262--265. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pinelle, D. and Gutwin, C. A groupware design framework for loosely coupled workgroups. In Proc. ECSCW 2005, Springer (2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ringel, M., Ryall, K., Shen, C., Forlines, C., and Vernier, F. Release, relocate, reorient, resize: fluid techniques for document sharing in multi-user interactive tables. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1441--1444. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., and Morris, M. R. Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. In Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM Press (2004), 284--293. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salvador, T., Scholtz, J., and Larson, J. The Denver model for groupware design. SIGCHI Bull. 28, 1 (Jan. 1996), 52-58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schmidt, K., and Simone, C. Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. CSCW: J. Coll. Comp. 5, (1996), 155--200. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott, S. D., Carpendale, M. S. T., and Habelski, S. Storage bins: mobile storage for collaborative tabletop displays. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 25, 4, (2005), 58--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott, S. D., Carpendale, M. S. T., and Inkpen, K. M. 2004. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM Press (2004), 294--303. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott, S.D., Grant, K.D., and Mandryk, R.L. System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In Proc. ECSCW 2003, Springer (2004), 159--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stone, M. C., Fishkin, K., and Bier, E. A. The movable filter as a user interface tool. In Proc. CHI '94, ACM Press (1994), 306--312. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tang, J. C. Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 34, 2 (1991), 143--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trans2D. http://mail.rochester.edu/~mabernet/trans2d/.Google Scholar
- Tse, E., Histon, J., Scott, S. D., and Greenberg, S. Avoiding interference: how people use spatial separation and partitioning in SDG workspaces. In Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM Press (2004), 252--261. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ware, C. and Lewis, M. The DragMag image magnifier. In Proc. CHI '95, ACM Press (1995), 407--408. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays
Recommendations
Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces
CSCW '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative workResearchers seeking alternatives to traditional desktop computers have begun exploring the potential collaborative benefits of digital tabletop displays. However, there are still many open issues related to the design of collaborative tabletop ...
Comparing multi-touch tabletops and multi-mouse single-display groupware setups
MexIHC '10: Proceedings of the 3rd Mexican Workshop on Human Computer InteractionIn spite of all the attention paid to multi-touch tabletop displays, little is known about the collaborative tasks they are best suited for in comparison to alternatives such as multi-mouse Single-Display Groupware setups. In this paper, we share the ...
Mediating Group Dynamics through Tabletop Interface Design
A Stanford University research group explores how design alternatives for tabletop interfaces can impact group dynamics to promote effective teamwork. They built and evaluated a series of novel prototypes that explore Multi-User Coordination Policies ...
Comments