Abstract
We present the one-loop effective action up to dimension eight after integrating out degenerate scalars using the Heat-Kernel method. The result is provided without assuming any specific form of either UV or low energy theories, i.e., universal. In this paper, we consider the complete effects of only heavy scalar propagators in the loops. We also verify part of the results using the covariant diagram technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
No data associated in the manuscript.
Notes
It is important to note that for HKC computation at coinciding point, one must not set \(z=0\) in Eq. (3.2) as \(\{D_\mu (z\cdot D) \,b_k(x,y)\}|_{z=0} = D_\mu \, b_k(x,y)|_{z=0} \ne 0\).
From now onwards we will drop the superscript E and will use D uniformly.
This division is necessary to eliminate the overcounting when different operator structures under trace give rise to the same diagram.
It should be noted that if a specific diagram and its mirror image cannot be superimposed onto each other even after rotation under trace (see e.g. the second diagram in Table 5), these diagrams are connected via Hermitian conjugation. The conjugate diagrams receive exactly similar contributions as their parent diagrams after the expansion of the covariant structures, so we avoid writing them separately.
Under trace, as cyclic permutations are equivalent, a commutator is zero. Total derivatives can be written as a commutator, i.e., \((D_\mu \;U)=[D_\mu ,U]\) and hence are zero under a trace. Along with the identity given in Eq. (A.8) we further use the Bianchi identity, \(G_{\rho \sigma ;\mu }+G_{\sigma \mu ;\rho }+G_{\mu \rho ;\sigma } = 0\), to simplify terms.
References
S. Weinberg, Effective gauge theories. Phys. Lett. B 91, 51–55 (1980)
H. Georgi, Effective field theory. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 209–252 (1993)
A.V. Manohar, Introduction to effective field theories. Les Houches Lect. Notes 108 (2020). arXiv:1804.05863
T. Cohen, As scales become separated: lectures on effective field theory. PoS TASI2018, 011 (2019). arXiv:1903.03622
I. Brivio, M. Trott, The standard model as an effective field theory. Phys. Rept. 793, 1–98 (2019). arXiv:1706.08945
G. Isidori, F. Wilsch, D. Wyler, The standard model effective field theory at work. arXiv:2303.16922
V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca, E. Venturini, Matching scalar leptoquarks to the SMEFT at one loop. JHEP 07, 225 (2020). arXiv:2003.12525
M. Chala, A. Díaz-Carmona, G. Guedes, A Green’s basis for the bosonic SMEFT to dimension 8. JHEP 05, 138 (2022). arXiv:2112.12724
H. Georgi, On-shell effective field theory. Nucl. Phys. B 361, 339–350 (1991)
A. Barzinji, M. Trott, A. Vasudevan, Equations of motion for the standard model effective field theory: theory and applications. Phys. Rev. D 98(11), 116005 (2018). arXiv:1806.06354
J.C. Criado, M. Pérez-Victoria, Field redefinitions in effective theories at higher orders. JHEP 03, 038 (2019). arXiv:1811.09413
U. Banerjee, J. Chakrabortty, C. Englert, S.U. Rahaman, M. Spannowsky, Integrating out heavy scalars with modified equations of motion: matching computation of dimension-eight SMEFT coefficients. Phys. Rev. D 107(5), 055007 (2023). arXiv:2210.14761
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia, H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, ...: higher dimension operators in the SM EFT. JHEP 08, 016 (2017). arXiv:1512.03433
L. Lehman, A. Martin, Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods. JHEP 02, 081 (2016). arXiv:1510.00372
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia, H. Murayama, Operator bases, \(S\)-matrices, and their partition functions. JHEP 10, 199 (2017). arXiv:1706.08520
L. Lehman, A. Martin, Hilbert series for constructing Lagrangians: expanding the phenomenologist’s toolbox. Phys. Rev. D 91, 105014 (2015). arXiv:1503.07537
R.M. Fonseca, Enumerating the operators of an effective field theory. Phys. Rev. D 101(3), 035040 (2020). arXiv:1907.12584
R.M. Fonseca, The Sym2Int program: going from symmetries to interactions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 873(1), 012045 (2017). arXiv:1703.05221
B. Gripaios, D. Sutherland, DEFT: a program for operators in EFT. JHEP 01, 128 (2019). arXiv:1807.07546
J.C. Criado, BasisGen: automatic generation of operator bases. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(3), 256 (2019). arXiv:1901.03501
C.B. Marinissen, R. Rahn, W.J. Waalewijn, ..., 83106786, 114382724, 1509048322, 2343463290, 27410087742, ... efficient hilbert series for effective theories. Phys. Lett. B 808, 135632 (2020). arXiv:2004.09521
U. Banerjee, J. Chakrabortty, S. Prakash, S.U. Rahaman, Characters and group invariant polynomials of (super)fields: road to Lagrangian. Eur. Phys. J. C 80(10), 938 (2020). arXiv:2004.12830
R.V. Harlander, T. Kempkens, M.C. Schaaf, The standard model effective field theory up to mass dimension 12. arXiv:2305.06832
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu, Y.-H. Zheng, Operator bases in effective field theories with sterile neutrinos: d \(\le\) 9. JHEP 11, 003 (2021). arXiv:2105.09329
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu, Y.-H. Zheng, Operators for generic effective field theory at any dimension: on-shell amplitude basis construction. JHEP 04, 140 (2022). arXiv:2201.04639
W. Buchmüller, D. Wyler, Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavour conservation. Nucl. Phys. B 268(3), 621–653 (1986)
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian. JHEP 10, 085 (2010). arXiv:1008.4884
L. Lehman, Extending the standard model effective field theory with the complete set of dimension-7 operators. Phys. Rev. D 90(12), 125023 (2014). arXiv:1410.4193
C.W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the standard model effective field theory. arXiv:2005.00059
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu, Y.-H. Zheng, Complete set of dimension-8 operators in the standard model effective field theory. arXiv:2005.00008
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu, Y.-H. Zheng, Complete set of dimension-9 operators in the standard model effective field theory. arXiv:2007.07899
Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma, An explicit construction of the dimension-9 operator basis in the standard model effective field theory. arXiv:2007.08125
Anisha, S. Das Bakshi, J. Chakrabortty, S. Prakash, Hilbert series and plethystics: paving the path towards 2HDM- and MLRSM-EFT. JHEP 09, 035 (2019). arXiv:1905.11047
U. Banerjee, J. Chakrabortty, S. Prakash, S.U. Rahaman, M. Spannowsky, Effective operator bases for beyond standard model scenarios: an EFT compendium for discoveries. JHEP 01, 028 (2021). arXiv:2008.11512
N.P. Hartland, F. Maltoni, E.R. Nocera, J. Rojo, E. Slade, E. Vryonidou, C. Zhang, A Monte Carlo global analysis of the standard model effective field theory: the top quark sector. JHEP 04, 100 (2019). arXiv:1901.05965
I. Brivio, S. Bruggisser, F. Maltoni, R. Moutafis, T. Plehn, E. Vryonidou, S. Westhoff, C. Zhang, O new physics, where art thou? A global search in the top sector. JHEP 02, 131 (2020). arXiv:1910.03606
I. Brivio, Y. Jiang, M. Trott, The SMEFTsim package, theory and tools. JHEP 12, 070 (2017). arXiv:1709.06492
J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, T. You, Top, Higgs, diboson and electroweak fit to the standard model effective field theory. JHEP 04, 279 (2021). arXiv:2012.02779
E Bagnaschi, J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz, T. You, SMEFT analysis of \(m_{W}\). arXiv:2204.05260
J. Ellis, C.W. Murphy, V. Sanz, T. You, Updated global SMEFT fit to Higgs, diboson and electroweak data. JHEP 06, 146 (2018). arXiv:1803.03252
S. Das Bakshi, J. Chakrabortty, S. Prakash, S.U. Rahaman, M. Spannowsky, EFT diagrammatica: UV roots of the CP-conserving SMEFT. JHEP 06, 033 (2021). arXiv:2103.11593
W. Naskar, S. Prakash, S.U. Rahaman, EFT Diagrammatica II: tracing the UV origin of bosonic D6 CPV and D8 SMEFT operators. arXiv:2205.00910
R. Cepedello, F. Esser, M. Hirsch, V. Sanz, Mapping the SMEFT to discoverable models. JHEP 09, 229 (2022). arXiv:2207.13714
G. Guedes, P. Olgoso, J. Santiago, Towards the one loop IR/UV dictionary in the SMEFT: one loop generated operators from new scalars and fermions. arXiv:2303.16965
J. Gargalionis, R.R. Volkas, Exploding operators for Majorana neutrino masses and beyond. JHEP 01, 074 (2021). arXiv:2009.13537
H.-L. Li, Y.-H. Ni, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu, The bottom-up EFT: complete UV resonances of the SMEFT operators. arXiv:2204.03660
J. Chakrabortty, S. Prakash, S.U. Rahaman, M. Spannowsky, Uncovering the root of LEFT in SMEFT. EPL 136(1), 11002 (2021). arXiv:2011.00859
Anisha, S. Das Bakshi, J. Chakrabortty, S. K. Patra, Connecting electroweak-scale observables to BSM physics through EFT and Bayesian statistics. Phys. Rev. D 103(7), 076007 (2021). arXiv:2010.04088
Anisha, S. Das Bakshi, S. Banerjee, A. Biekötter, J. Chakrabortty, S. Kumar Patra, M. Spannowsky, Effective limits on single scalar extensions in the light of recent LHC data. arXiv:2111.05876
S. Das Bakshi, J. Chakrabortty, M. Spannowsky, Classifying standard model extensions effectively with precision observables. arXiv:2012.03839
B. Henning, X. Lu, H. Murayama, How to use the standard model effective field theory. JHEP 01, 023 (2016). arXiv:1412.1837
A. Drozd, J. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You, The universal one-loop effective action. JHEP 03, 180 (2016). arXiv:1512.03003
S.A.R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You, Z. Zhang, Mixed heavy–light matching in the universal one-loop effective action. Phys. Lett. B 762, 166–176 (2016). arXiv:1604.02445
F. del Aguila, Z. Kunszt, J. Santiago, One-loop effective lagrangians after matching. Eur. Phys. J. C 76(5), 244 (2016). arXiv:1602.00126
S.A.R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You, Z. Zhang, Extending the universal one-loop effective action: heavy-light coefficients. JHEP 08, 054 (2017). arXiv:1706.07765
M. Krämer, B. Summ, A. Voigt, Completing the scalar and fermionic universal one-loop effective action. JHEP 01, 079 (2020). arXiv:1908.04798
A. Angelescu, P. Huang, Integrating out new fermions at one loop. JHEP 01, 049 (2021). arXiv:2006.16532
S.A.R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, P.N.H. Vuong, T. You, Z. Zhang, The fermionic universal one-loop effective action. JHEP 11, 078 (2020). arXiv:2006.16260
S. Das Bakshi, J. Chakrabortty, S.K. Patra, CoDEx: Wilson coefficient calculator connecting SMEFT to UV theory. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(1), 21 (2019). arXiv:1808.04403
J. Fuentes-Martín, M. König, J. Pagès, A.E. Thomsen, F. Wilsch, A proof of concept for matchete: an automated tool for matching effective theories. arXiv:2212.04510
A. Carmona, A. Lazopoulos, P. Olgoso, J. Santiago, Matchmakereft: automated tree-level and one-loop matching. SciPost Phys. 12(6), 198 (2022). arXiv:2112.10787
T. Cohen, X. Lu, Z. Zhang, STrEAMlining EFT matching. SciPost Phys. 10(5), 098 (2021). arXiv:2012.07851
J. Fuentes-Martin, M. König, J. Pagès, A.E. Thomsen, F. Wilsch, SuperTracer: a calculator of functional supertraces for one-loop EFT matching. JHEP 04, 281 (2021). arXiv:2012.08506
J.C. Criado, MatchingTools: a Python library for symbolic effective field theory calculations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 227, 42–50 (2018). arXiv:1710.06445
M.K. Gaillard, The effective one loop Lagrangian with derivative couplings. Nucl. Phys. B 268, 669–692 (1986)
O. Cheyette, Effective action for the standard model with large Higgs mass. Nucl. Phys. B 297, 183–204 (1988)
L.-H. Chan, Effective-action expansion in perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1222–1225 (1985)
B. Henning, X. Lu, H. Murayama, One-loop matching and running with covariant derivative expansion. JHEP 01, 123 (2018). arXiv:1604.01019
S. Dittmaier, S. Schuhmacher, M. Stahlhofen, Integrating out heavy fields in the path integral using the background-field method: general formalism. Eur. Phys. J. C 81(9), 826 (2021). arXiv:2102.12020
J. Fuentes-Martin, J. Portoles, P. Ruiz-Femenia, Integrating out heavy particles with functional methods: a simplified framework. JHEP 09, 156 (2016). arXiv:1607.02142
T. Cohen, X. Lu, Z. Zhang, Functional prescription for EFT matching. JHEP 02, 228 (2021). arXiv:2011.02484
A. van de Ven, Explicit counteraction algorithms in higher dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 250(1), 593–617 (1985)
Z. Zhang, Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching. JHEP 05, 152 (2017). arXiv:1610.00710
G. von Gersdorff, K. Santos, New covariant Feynman rules for effective field theories. J. High Energy Phys. 2023, 25 (2023). arXiv:2212.07451
S. Minakshisundaram, A. Pleijel, Some properties of the eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator on Riemannian manifolds. Can. J. Math. 1, 242–256 (1949)
S. Minakshisundaram, Eigenfunctions on Riemannian manifolds. J. Indian Math. Soc. 17, 158–165 (1953)
J. Hadamard, Lectures on Cauchy’s Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations Dover phoenix editions. (Dover Publications, New York, 2003)
B.S. DeWitt, Dynamical theory of groups and fields. Conf. Proc. C 630701, 585–820 (1964)
R. Seeley, The resolvent of an elliptic boundary problem. Am. J. Math. 91(4), 889–920 (1969)
J.S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization. Phys. Rev. 82, 664–679 (1951)
D.V. Vassilevich, Heat kernel expansion: user’s manual. Phys. Rept. 388, 279–360 (2003). arxiv:hep-th/0306138
I.G. Avramidi, Heat kernel approach in quantum field theory. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 104, 3–32 (2002). arxiv:math-ph/0107018
I.G. Avramidi, Heat Kernel Method and Its Applications (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015)
K. Kirsten, Spectral functions in mathematics and physics (2001)
S.A. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-time, vol. 17 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989)
I.G. Avramidi, The Heat kernel approach for calculating the effective action in quantum field theory and quantum gravity. arxiv:hep-th/9509077
I. Avramidi, A covariant technique for the calculation of the one-loop effective action. Nucl. Phys. B 355(3), 712–754 (1991)
A.A. Bel’kov, A.V. Lanyov, A. Schaale, Calculation of heat-kernel coefficients and usage of computer algebra. Comput. Phys. Commun. 95(2), 123–130 (1996)
D. Fliegner, M.G. Schmidt, C. Schubert, The Higher derivative expansion of the effective action by the string inspired method. Part 1. Z. Phys. C 64, 111–116 (1994). arxiv:hep-ph/9401221
D. Fliegner, P. Haberl, M.G. Schmidt, C. Schubert, The Higher derivative expansion of the effective action by the string inspired method. Part 2. Ann. Phys. 264, 51–74 (1998). arxiv:hep-th/9707189
S. Dawson, S. Homiller, M. Sullivan, Impact of dimension-eight SMEFT contributions: a case study. Phys. Rev. D 104(11), 115013 (2021). arXiv:2110.06929
C. Hays, A. Martin, V. Sanz, J. Setford, On the impact of dimension-eight SMEFT operators on Higgs measurements. JHEP 02, 123 (2019). arXiv:1808.00442
T. Corbett, A. Helset, A. Martin, M. Trott, EWPD in the SMEFT to dimension eight. JHEP 06, 076 (2021). arXiv:2102.02819
S. Das Bakshi, A. Díaz-Carmona, Renormalisation of SMEFT bosonic interactions up to dimension eight by LNV operators. arXiv:2301.07151
S. Das Bakshi, M. Chala, A. Díaz-Carmona, G. Guedes, Towards the renormalisation of the standard model effective field theory to dimension eight: bosonic interactions II. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137(8), 973 (2022). arXiv:2205.03301
M. Chala, G. Guedes, M. Ramos, J. Santiago, Towards the renormalisation of the Standard Model effective field theory to dimension eight: bosonic interactions I. SciPost Phys. 11, 065 (2021). arXiv:2106.05291
S. Alioli, R. Boughezal, E. Mereghetti, F. Petriello, Novel angular dependence in Drell-Yan lepton production via dimension-8 operators. Phys. Lett. B 809, 135703 (2020). arXiv:2003.11615
C. Degrande, A basis of dimension-eight operators for anomalous neutral triple gauge boson interactions. JHEP 02, 101 (2014). arXiv:1308.6323
J. Ellis, H.-J. He, R.-Q. Xiao, Probing new physics in dimension-8 neutral gauge couplings at e\(^{+}\)e\(^-\) colliders. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64(2), 221062 (2021). arXiv:2008.04298
C. Hays, A. Helset, A. Martin, M. Trott, Exact SMEFT formulation and expansion to \(\cal{O} (v^4/\Lambda ^4)\). JHEP 11, 087 (2020). arXiv:2007.00565
S. Dawson, D. Fontes, C. Quezada-Calonge, J.J. Sanz-Cillero, Matching the 2HDM to the HEFT and the SMEFT: decoupling and perturbativity. arXiv:2305.07689
S. Dawson, D. Fontes, S. Homiller, M. Sullivan, Role of dimension-eight operators in an EFT for the 2HDM. Phys. Rev. D 106(5), 055012 (2022). arXiv:2205.01561
J. Ellis, S.-F. Ge, H.-J. He, R.-Q. Xiao, Probing the scale of new physics in the \(ZZ\gamma\) coupling at \(e^+e^-\) colliders. Chin. Phys. C 44(6), 063106 (2020). arXiv:1902.06631
T. Corbett, J. Desai, O.J.P. Éboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Martines, P. Reimitz, Impact of dimension-eight SMEFT operators in the EWPO and Triple Gauge Couplings analysis in Universal SMEFT. arXiv:2304.03305
J. Ellis, K. Mimasu, F. Zampedri, Dimension-8 SMEFT analysis of minimal scalar field extensions of the standard model. arXiv:2304.06663
C. Degrande, H.-L. Li, Impact of dimension-8 SMEFT operators on diboson productions. arXiv:2303.10493
U. Banerjee, J. Chakrabortty, C. Englert, W. Naskar, S. U. Rahaman, M. Spannowsky, EFT, decoupling, Higgs mixing and all that jazz. arXiv:2303.05224
B. Grinstein, M.B. Wise, Operator analysis for precision electroweak physics. Phys. Lett. B 265, 326–334 (1991)
H.H. Patel, Package-X: a mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 276–290 (2015). arXiv:1503.01469
H.H. Patel, Package-X 2.0: a mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 218, 66–70 (2017). arXiv:1612.00009
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the useful discussions with Diptarka Das and Nilay Kundu. The authors would also like to acknowledge the initial discussions with Priyank Kaushik.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Computation of operators \({\mathcal {O}}(D^4 U^3)\): a detailed example
Based on the methodology discussed in Sect. 3, we perform, here, an explicit calculation of the operators class \({\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^3\right)\) for the sake of detailed demonstration. To compute \({\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^3\right)\), we obtain the following necessary relations using Eq. (3.8).
Here, we set
that are quite evident from Eq. (3.5). It is important to note that in the above equations, we have two different kinds of structures: (i) \(D^4\) and \(D^2\) act on \(U\,b_k\), and (ii) \(T_{(4)}\) acts on \(b_k\). Thus, our initial aim is to calculate the explicit form of these operators, first.
The actions of \(D^4\) and \(D^2\) operators on \((U\,b_k)\) are defined from Eqs. (A.2)–(A.4), as follows:
Action of \(T_{(4)}\) can be addressed in the following form derived from Eqs. (3.5)–(3.7)
In this derivation, we use the anti-symmetric nature of \(G_{\mu \nu }\) and the following identity
where X is any arbitrary tensor. This leads to our finding
Now, we are ready to demonstrate the explicit computation of operators \({\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^3\right)\) belonging to the HKC \(b_5\).
\(\underline{{\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^0\right) }\)
\(T_{(4)}\) operator contains a derivative acting on HKCs. Hence, to calculate \([b_2]_{U^0}\), we, first, need to calculate \(D_\nu b_0 |_{z=0}\). From Eq. (3.3), we find
This provides \({\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4U^0\right)\), directly from Eq. (A.1), as
\(\underline{{\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^1\right) }\)
Next, to compute \({\mathcal {O}} (D^4 U^1),\) we calculate the necessary derivatives of HKCs using Eqs. (3.3)-(3.7).
Assembling all the contributions, computed here, in Eq. (A.2) we find
\(\underline{{\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^2\right) }\)
Following the similar path, we calculate the derivatives of HKCs required for the computation of operators \({\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^2\right)\).
Again, we collect all these contributions and with the help of Eq. (A.3), we note the following equation.
\(\underline{{\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^3\right) }\)
We repeat the same task, one more time. We focus on the computation of the relevant derivatives of HKCs to calculate the operators \({\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^3\right)\).
Finally, we combine all the above-computed expressions and put them in Eq. (A.4) to find the operators of the class \({\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^3\right)\). Note that, at this stage, all the evaluated operator structures are not independent. We employ the trace properties and a few identitiesFootnote 6 that simplify the HKCs and allow us to write them in terms of independent operators. Finally, we find the independent operators of the form \({\mathcal {O}}\left( D^4 U^3\right)\) as
Appendix B: Review of covariant diagram method
In this section, we present a brief review of the development of the covariant diagram representation starting from the original gauge-covariant functional form of the effective action. The topic has been greatly discussed in Refs. [72, 73]. As shown in Eq. (1.1), the one-loop part of the effective action for a field can be given as follows:
here, \(c_s = +1/2\), or \(+1\) depending on whether the heavy field is a real scalar or complex scalar. The trace “Tr” can then be evaluated by taking an integral over the momentum eigenstate basis,
By following a straightforward manipulation of introducing the completeness relation for the basis of the spatial eigenstates, we find the following form of the effective one-loop Lagrangian,
After performing the momentum integral, the first term in Eq. (B.3) reduces to a constant, while the second term can be expanded in an infinite series as shown in Eq. (6.1).
1.1 B.1 Covariant loop diagrams, their structures and values
In this subsection, we present all the diagrams that can contribute to dimension eight interactions at each order of \(P^{2n}U^{m}\) with possible contractions among \(P_{\mu }\)’s and note down the corresponding operator structures containing open covariant derivatives (\(P_{\mu }\)’s) and value for the loops.
1.1.1 \(\mathbf {O\left( P^4\,U^3\right) }\)
See Table 2.
1.1.2 \(\mathbf {O(P^8)}\)
See Table 3.
1.1.3 \(\mathbf {O\left( P^6\,U^2\right) }\)
See Table 4.
1.1.4 \(\mathbf {O(P^6\,U)}\)
See Table 5.
1.2 B.2 Master integrals for heavy loops
Each of the covariant diagrams mentioned in Sect. 6 corresponds to a loop integral with n heavy propagators and \(2n_c\) contractions which can be generalised in the following form
We have used Package-X [109, 110] to compute the loop integrals. In Table 6, we have listed the results for the loop integrals discussed in Sect. 6.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Banerjee, U., Chakrabortty, J., Rahaman, S.U. et al. One-loop effective action up to dimension eight: integrating out heavy scalar(s). Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139, 159 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-04890-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-04890-0