Skip to main content
Log in

A remark on the motivic Galois group and the quantum coadjoint action

  • Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been suggested that the Grothendieck–Teichmüller group GT should act on the Duflo isomorphism of su(2), but the corresponding realization of GT turned out to be trivial. We show that a solvable quotient of the motivic Galois group – which is supposed to agree with GT – is closely related to the quantum coadjoint action on \(U_q(sl_2)\) for q a root of unity, i.e. in the quantum group case one has a nontrivial realization of a quotient of the motivic Galois group. From a discussion of the algebraic properties of this realization we conclude that in more general cases than \(U_q(sl_2)\) it should be related to a quantum version of the motivic Galois group. Finally, we discuss the relation of our construction to quantum field and string theory and explain what we believe to be the ‘physical reason’ behind this relation between the motivic Galois group and the quantum coadjoint action. This might be a starting point for the generalization of our construction to more involved examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.Y. Alekseev, A. Recknagel, V. Schomerus, hep-th/9908040v2

  2. R. Bezrukavnikov, math.RT/0403003

  3. M. Bianchi, Y.S. Stanev, hep-th/9711069

  4. C.G. Callan, J.A. Harvey, A. Strominger, Nucl. Phys. B 359, 611 (1991)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Chari, A. Pressley, Quantum Groups (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)

  6. T. Deguchi, K. Fabricius, B.M. McCoy, J. Statist. Phys. 102, 701 (2001) [cond-mat/9912141]

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. C. De Concini, V. Kac, Prog. Math. 92, 471 (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. C. De Concini, V. Kac, C. Procesi, J. Am. Math. Soc. 5, 151 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. V.G. Drinfeld, Leningr. Math. J. 2, 829 (1991)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Duflo, C. R. Acad. Sci. A 269, 437 (1969)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Dijkgraaf, E. Verlinde, H. Verlinde, Nucl. Phys. B 352, 59 (1991)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Förste, D. Ghoshal, S. Panda, Phys. Lett. B 411, 46 (1997) [hep-th/9706057]

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Fabricius, B.M. McCoy, J. Statist. Phys. 103, 647 (2001) [cond-mat/0009279]

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Fabricius, B.M. McCoy, J. Statist. Phys. 104, 573 (2001) [cond-mat/0012501]

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Grosse, J. Madore, H. Steinacker, hep-th/0005273v2

  16. H. Grosse, K.-G. Schlesinger, hep-th/0412161

  17. C. Hofman, W.K. Ma, hep-th/0102201v3

  18. Y. Ihara, Some Problems on Three-point Ramifications and Associated Large Galois Representations (Adv. Stud. Pure Math. bf 12) (North-Holland, Amsterdam and New York, 1987), pp. 173–188

  19. Y. Ihara, The Galois Representations Arising From ℙ1-{0,1,∞} and Tate Twists of Even Degree, Galois Groups Over ℚ (Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 16) (Springer, Berlin New York, 1989), pp. 299–313

  20. A. Iqbal, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, C. Vafa, hep-th/ 0312022

  21. M. Kontsevich, alg-geom 9411018

  22. M. Kontsevich, math/9709180

  23. M. Kontsevich, math.QA/9904055

  24. C. Korff, math-ph/0302002v2

  25. M. Kontsevich, Y. Soibelman, math.QA/0001151v2

  26. A. Klymik, K. Schmüdgen, Quantum Groups and Their Representations (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1997)

  27. G. Lusztig, Introduction to quantum groups (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993)

  28. J. Madore, Class. Quantum Grav. 9, 69 (1992)

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Okounkov, N. Reshetikhin, C. Vafa, hep-th/0309208

  30. S.-J. Rey, Phys. Rev. D 43, 526 (1991)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. K.-G. Schlesinger, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, 10189 (2002) [math.QA/0104275]

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. E. Witten, Mirror manifolds and topological field theory. In Essays on Mirror Manifolds, ed. by S.T. Yau (International Press, Hong Kong, 1991)

  33. E. Witten, Surv. Differ. Geom. 1, 243 (1991)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Grosse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grosse, H., Schlesinger, KG. A remark on the motivic Galois group and the quantum coadjoint action. Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 269–275 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2006-02487-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2006-02487-8

Keywords

Navigation