Erratum to: Artificial neural network modelling of generalised parton distributions

1 Erratum to: Eur. Phys. J. C https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10211-5

In this article the wrong figure appeared as Fig. 8.; the Fig. 8 should have appeared as shown below.

The original article has been corrected.

Fig. 8

Result of constraining the ANN model using 200 points evaluated with the GK model [25–27] for sea quarks: $x = \xi$ case, positivity enforced, $F_{D}(\beta , \alpha )$ not shown. See the text for more details. The comparison is for (left) $x = \xi$, (center) $\xi = 0.1$ and (right) $\xi = 0.5$. The dashed lines denote the GK model, while the bands represent the result of the fit in the form of a $68\%$ confidence level. The inner bands show $F_{C}(\beta , \alpha )$ contribution, alone, while the outer bands are for $F_{C}(\beta , \alpha ) + F_{S}(\beta , \alpha )$. The regions excluded by the positivity constraint are denoted by the hatched bands