Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity of \(\beta _4\) values extracted from quasi elastic barrier distribution to the 2n transfer channel

  • Regular Article - Experimental Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent times, the Fusion Barrier Distributions (FBD) determined from quasi-elastic scattering measurements have been employed to determine the hexadecapole deformation parameter \(\beta _4\) value precisely. In reactions where transfer channels are favourable, coupling due to transfer may affect the determination of \(\beta _4\). In order to study the role of transfer channels while determining \(\beta _4\) from barrier distribution, the quasi-elastic scattering measurements have been carried out in \(^{16}\)O + \(^{176}\)Yb. Quasi-elastic scattering excitation function has been measured at backward angles with respect to the beam direction and barrier distribution \(D^{\text {qel}}(E)\) has been derived. Experimentally obtained barrier distribution has been compared with coupled channel calculations using CCFULL code. The effect of two neutron transfer and hexadecapole deformation has been studied using coupled channel calculation. \(\chi ^2\) was calculated in a two dimensional space of \(\beta _4\) and neutron transfer strength \(P_{tr}\). Without considering neutron transfer, \(\chi ^2\) minimization of \(D^{\text {qel}}(E)\) was not possible and the best-fit was found over a small range of \(\beta _4\) and \(P_{tr}\). At \(P_{tr}=0.37\), corresponding to minimum \(\chi ^2\), the \(\beta _4\) of \(^{176}\)Yb is determined to be \(0.00 \pm 0.015\). This value of \(\beta _4\) is in agreement with that obtained from Coulomb excitation measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: No additional data associated with this manuscript.]

References

  1. R.G. Stokstad, Y. Eisen, S. Kaplanis, D. Pelte, U. Smilansky, I. Tserruya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 465 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Dasgupta, D.J. Hinde, N. Rowley, A.M. Stefanini, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 48, 401 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. B.B. Back, H. Esbensen, C.L. Jiang, K.E. Rehm, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 317 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. M.J. Rhoades-Brown, V.E. Oberacker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1435 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Canto, P. Gomes, R. Donangelo, M. Hussein, Phys. Rep. 424, 1 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Rowley, Nucl. Phys. A 538, 205 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.T. Kruppa, P. Romain, M.A. Nagarajan, N. Rowley, Nucl. Phys. A 560, 845 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. C.R. Morton, M. Dasgupta, D.J. Hinde, J.R. Leigh, R.C. Lemmon, J.P. Lestone, J.C. Mein, J.O. Newton, H. Timmers, N. Rowley, A.T. Kruppa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4074 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A.A. Sonzogni, J.D. Bierman, M.P. Kelly, J.P. Lestone, J.F. Liang, R. Vandenbosch, Phys. Rev. C 57, 722 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. J.D. Bierman, P. Chan, J.F. Liang, M.P. Kelly, A.A. Sonzogni, R. Vandenbosch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1587 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. V.I. Zagrebaev, Phys. Rev. C 67, 061601 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Kalkal, S. Mandal, N. Madhavan, A. Jhingan, E. Prasad, R. Sandal, S. Nath, J. Gehlot, R. Garg, G. Mohanto, M. Saxena, S. Goyal, S. Verma, B.R. Behera, S. Kumar, U.D. Pramanik, A.K. Sinha, R. Singh, Phys. Rev. C 83, 054607 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Rowley, H. Timmers, J. Leigh, M. Dasgupta, D. Hinde, J. Mein, C. Morton, J. Newton, Phys. Lett. B 373, 23 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Timmers, J. Leigh, M. Dasgupta, D. Hinde, R. Lemmon, J. Mein, C. Morton, J. Newton, N. Rowley, Nucl. Phys. A 584, 190 (1995)

  15. L.R. Gasques, M. Evers, D.J. Hinde, M. Dasgupta, P.R.S. Gomes, R.M. Anjos, M.L. Brown, M.D. Rodriguez, R.G. Thomas, K. Hagino, Phys. Rev. C 76, 024612 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. H.M. Jia, C.J. Lin, F. Yang, X.X. Xu, H.Q. Zhang, Z.H. Liu, Z.D. Wu, L. Yang, N.R. Ma, P.F. Bao, L.J. Sun, Phys. Rev. C 90, 031601(R) (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Y.K. Gupta, B.K. Nayak, U. Garg, K. Hagino, K.B. Howard, N. Sensharma, M. Senyigit, W.P. Tan, P.D. Omalley, M. Smith, R. Gandhi, T. Anderson, R.J. de Boer, B. Frentz, A. Gyurjinyan, O. Hall, M. Hall, J. Hu, E. Lamere, Q. Liu, A. Long, W. Lu, S. Lyons, K. Ostdiek, C. Seymour, M. Skulski, B. VandeKolk, Phys. Lett. B 806, 135473 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Esbensen, S. Landowne, Nucl. Phys. A 467, 136 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Lemmon, J. Leigh, J. Wei, C. Morton, D. Hinde, J. Newton, J. Mein, M. Dasgupta, N. Rowley, Phys. Lett. B 316, 32 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Fernandez-Niello, C.H. Dasso, Phys. Rev. C 39, 2069 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. J.R. Leigh, M. Dasgupta, D.J. Hinde, J.C. Mein, C.R. Morton, R.C. Lemmon, J.P. Lestone, J.O. Newton, H. Timmers, J.X. Wei, N. Rowley, Phys. Rev. C 52, 3151 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Moller, J. Nix, W. Myers, W. Swiatecki, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Raman, C.W. Nestor, P. Tikkanen, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78, 1 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. D.L. Hendrie, N.K. Glendenning, B.G. Harvey, N. Jarvis, H.H. Duhm, J. Saudinos, J. Mahoney, Phys. Lett. 26B, 127 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. H.J. Wollersheim, W. Wilcke, T.W. Elze, Phys. Rev. C 11, 2008 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Cooper, W. Bertozzi, J. Heisenberg, S. Kowalski, W. Turchinetz, C. Williamson, Phys. Rev. C 13, 1083 (1976)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Rajbongshi, K. Kalita, S. Nath, J. Gehlot, T. Banerjee, I. Mukul, R. Dubey, N. Madhavan, C.J. Lin, A. Shamlath, P.V. Laveen, M. Shareef, N. Kumar, P. Jisha, P. Sharma, Phys. Rev. C 93, 054622 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A.B. Balantekin, P.E. Reimer, Phys. Rev. C 33, 379 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. K. Hagino, N. Rowley, A. Kruppa, Comput. Phys. Comm. 123, 143 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. R.H. Spear, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 42, 55 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. C.R. Morton, A.C. Berriman, M. Dasgupta, D.J. Hinde, J.O. Newton, K. Hagino, I.J. Thompson, Phys. Rev. C 60, 044608 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. L. Corradi, G. Pollarolo, S. Szilner, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36, 113101 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. D. Bourgin, S. Courtin, F. Haas, A.M. Stefanini, G. Montagnoli, A. Goasduff, D. Montanari, L. Corradi, E. Fioretto, J. Huiming, F. Scarlassara, N. Rowley, S. Szilner, T. Mijatovie, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044610 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Pelletron operating staff is highly acknowledged for providing good quality beam during the experiment. We thank Dr. K. Hagino for various suggestions on quasi-elastic coupled channel calculations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Mohanto.

Additional information

Communicated by Alexandre Obertelli.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohanto, G., Parihari, A., Gupta, Y.K. et al. Sensitivity of \(\beta _4\) values extracted from quasi elastic barrier distribution to the 2n transfer channel. Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 234 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01143-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01143-z

Navigation