Skip to main content
Log in

NN final-state interaction in two-nucleon knockout from 16 O

  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A - Hadrons and Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The influence of the mutual interaction between the two outgoing nucleons (NN-FSI) in electro- and photoinduced two-nucleon knockout from 16 O has been investigated perturbatively. It turns out that the effect of NN-FSI depends on the kinematics and on the type of reaction considered. The effect is generally larger in pp- than in pn-knockout and in electroinduced than in photoinduced reactions. In superparallel kinematics NN-FSI leads in the (e,epp) channel to a strong increase of the cross-section, that is mainly due to a strong enhancement of the \(\Delta\)-current contribution. In pn-emission, however, this effect is partially cancelled by a destructive interference with the seagull current. For photoreactions NN-FSI is considerably reduced in superparallel kinematics and can be practically negligible in specific kinematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Müther, A. Polls, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45, 243 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Gottfried, Nucl. Phys. 5, 557 (1958); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 21, 29 (1963); W. Czyz, K. Gottfried, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 21, 47 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Boffi, C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, M. Radici, Electromagnetic Response of Atomic Nuclei, Oxford Studies in Nuclear Physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996).

  4. C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, Nucl. Phys. A 641, 297 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Giusti, H. Müther, F.D. Pacati, M. Stauf, Phys. Rev. C 60, 054608 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, K. Allaart, W.J.W. Geurts, W.H. Dickhoff, H. Müther, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1691 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, Nucl. Phys. A 615, 373 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, Phys. Rev. C 61, 054617 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, Eur. Phys. J. A 12, 69 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Ryckebusch, W. van Nespen, D. Debruyne, Phys. Lett. B 441, 1 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Ryckebusch, V. Van der Sluys, K. Heyde, H. Holvoet, W. Van Nespen, M. Waroquier, M. Vanderhaeghen, Nucl. Phys. A 624, 581 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Ryckebusch, D. Debruyne, W. van Nespen, Phys. Rev. C 57, 1319 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L.J.H.M. Kester et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1712 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C.J.G. Onderwater et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4893 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.J.G. Onderwater et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2213 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Rosner, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 44, 99 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Starink et al. , Phys. Lett. B 474, 33 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. The A2-Collaboration at MAMI, Proposal No.: A2/4-97; spokesperson: P. Grabmayr.

  19. The A1-Collaboration at MAMI, Proposal No.: A1/5-98; spokespersons: P. Grabmayr, G. Rosner.

  20. C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, Nucl. Phys. A 535, 573 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Knödler, H. Müther, Phys. Rev. C 63, 044602 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Schwamb, S. Boffi, C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, Eur. Phys. J. A 17, 7 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.C. McGeorge et al. , Phys. Rev. C 51, 1967 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Th. Lamparter et al. , Z. Phys. A 355, 1 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.D. McGregor et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 245 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  26. D.P. Watts et al. , Phys. Rev. C 62, 014616 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Wilhelm, H. Arenhövel, C. Giusti, F.D. Pacati, Z. Phys. A 359, 467 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  28. W.J.W. Geurts, K. Allaart, W.H. Dickhoff, H. Müther, Phys. Rev. C 54, 1144 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Machleidt, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19, 189 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Reid, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 50, 411 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R.B. Wiringa, R.A. Smith, T.L. Ainsworth, Phys. Rev. C 29, 1207 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Nadasen et al. , Phys. Rev. C 23, 1023 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  33. W.H. Dickhoff, Phys. Rev. C 58, 2807 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  34. W.H. Dickhoff, C.C. Gearhart, E.P. Roth, A. Polls, A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. C 60, 064319 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  35. M. Schwamb, H. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A 690, 647 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  36. E.W. Schmid, H. Ziegelmann, The Quantum Mechanical Three-Body Problem (Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, 1974).

  37. W. Glöckle, The Quantum Mechanical Few-Body Problem (Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 1983).

  38. R. Machleidt, K. Holinde, Ch. Elster, Phys. Rep. 149, 1 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Schwamb, PhD Thesis, Johannes Gutenberg-Univer sität Mainz, 1999.

  40. A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 2 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo, 1961).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Schwamb.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Orlandini

Received: 1 July 2003, Published online: 10 February 2004

PACS:

13.75.Cs Nucleon-nucleon interactions (including antinucleons, deuterons, etc.) - 21.60.-n Nuclear structure models and methods - 25.30.Fj Inelastic electron scattering to continuum

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwamb, M., Boffi, S., Giusti, C. et al. NN final-state interaction in two-nucleon knockout from 16 O . Eur. Phys. J. A 20, 233–244 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2003-10139-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2003-10139-6

Keywords

Navigation