Abstract
Modern societies face the challenge that the time scale of opinion formation is continuously accelerating in contrast to the time scale of political decision making. With the latter remaining of the order of the election cycle we examine here the case that the political state of a society is determined by the continuously evolving values of the electorate. Given this assumption we show that the time lags inherent in the election cycle will inevitable lead to political instabilities for advanced democracies characterized both by an accelerating pace of opinion dynamics and by high sensibilities (political correctness) to deviations from mainstream values. Our result is based on the observation that dynamical systems become generically unstable whenever time delays become comparable to the time it takes to adapt to the steady state. The time needed to recover from external shocks grows in addition dramatically close to the transition. Our estimates for the order of magnitude of the involved time scales indicate that socio-political instabilities may develop once the aggregate time scale for the evolution of the political values of the electorate falls below 7–15 months.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. Erneux, Applied delay differential equations (Springer Science & Business Media, 2009)
C. Gros, Complex and adaptive dynamical systems: a primer (Springer, 2015)
G. Singh, I.S. Ahuja, Int. J. Bus. Contin. Risk Manag. 3, 57 (2012)
J. Schnellenbach, C. Schubert, Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 40, 395 (2015)
S.S. Wolin, Theory Event 1, 1 (1997)
K.H. Goetz, West Eur. Polit. 37, 379 (2014)
J. Fleischer, Public Manag. Rev. 15, 313 (2013)
M. Tomba, South Atl. Q. 113, 353 (2014)
M. Wolffsohn, T. Brechenmacher, Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 13, 116 (2001)
H. Rosa, Social acceleration: a new theory of modernity (Columbia University Press, 2013)
E. Pain, Science 356, 14 (2017)
A. Menon, J.-P. Salter, Int. Aff. 92, 1297 (2016)
R.J. Dalton, S.E. Scarrow, B.E. Cain, J. Democr. 15, 124 (2004)
G. Hughes, Political correctness: a history of semantics and culture (John Wiley & Sons, 2011)
A. Maass, C. Suitner, E. Merkel, Does political correctness make (social) sense? in Social Cognition and communication, edited by J.P. Forgas, O. Vincze, J. Laszlo (Psychology Press, New York, NY, 2013), pp. 331–346
M.A. Abdollahian, T.G. Coan, H. Oh, B.A. Yesilada, Int. Stud. Q. 56, 827 (2012)
V. Spaiser, S. Ranganathan, R.P. Mann, D.J.T. Sumpter, PLOS ONE 9, e97856 (2014)
A.C. Alexander, R. Inglehart, C. Welzel, Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 33, 41 (2012)
S. Ranganathan, V. Spaiser, R.P. Mann, D.J.T. Sumpter, PLOS ONE 9, e86468 (2014)
R. Inglehart, P. Norris, Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash, HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026, 2016
R.S. Foa, Y. Mounk, J. Democr. 27, 5 (2016)
S. Dehaene, Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 145 (2003)
C. Gros, G. Kaczor, D. Marković, Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 28 (2012)
J.-P. Richard, Automatica 39, 1667 (2003)
M.J. Piotrowska, U. Foryś, Math. Comput. Model. 54, 2183 (2011)
H. Wernecke, B. Sándor, C. Gros, Sci. Rep. 7, 1087 (2017)
D. Chong, J.N. Druckman, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104, 663 (2010)
E. Boukas, Z. Liu, Deterministic and stochastic time-delay systems (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)
E.H. Van Nes, M. Scheffer, Am. Nat. 169, 738 (2007)
V. Dakos, M. Scheffer, E.H. van Nes, V. Brovkin, V. Petoukhov, H. Held, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 14308 (2008)
R.J. Shiller, The subprime solution: how today’s global financial crisis happened, and what to do about it (Princeton University Press, 2012)
M. Funke, M. Schularick, C. Trebesch, Eur. Econ. Rev. 88, 227 (2016)
B. Tranter, Sage Open 5 (2015), DOI: 10.1177/2158244015591826
D. d’Humieres, M.R. Beasley, B.A. Huberman, A. Libchaber, Phys. Rev. A 26, 3483 (1982)
B. Podobnik, M. Jusup, D. Kovac, H.E. Stanley, Complexity 2017, 1580526 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Gros, C. Entrenched time delays versus accelerating opinion dynamics: are advanced democracies inherently unstable?. Eur. Phys. J. B 90, 223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2017-80341-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2017-80341-y