Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Endogenous Streptococcus mitis panophthalmitis in a patient visiting the Dominican Republic
  1. Victoria Liu1,
  2. Adnan Pirbhai2 and
  3. Syed Faraz Masood3
  1. 1Medicine, McMaster University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2Ophthalmology, McMaster University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3Internal Medicine, McMaster University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Victoria Liu; victoria.liu{at}medportal.ca

Abstract

A 67-year-old woman presented with painful, acute vision loss after 5 days of fever and muscle aches while visiting the Dominican Republic. She had no recent history of ocular surgery, dental work or recent trauma. Anterior chamber aspiration confirmed an initial diagnosis of endogenous endophthalmitis, positive for Streptococcus mitis that progressed to panophthalmitis on return to Canada. Treatment included systemic antibiotics, intravitreal antibiotics and intravitreal dexamethasone. Despite the best medical treatment, the left eye progressed to corneal perforation 5 weeks after presentation. An evisceration with fitted orbital implant was successful in alleviating pain following the surgery. S. mitis is a rare, but possible cause of endogenous endophthalmitis and panophthalmitis. It was important to work with a multidisciplinary and global team to coordinate and offer appropriate treatment measures. Although vision was lost, evisceration of the left eye provided ocular comfort and good cosmetic outcomes for the patient.

  • ophthalmology
  • infectious diseases

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors listed contributed to this article. VL contributed to data collection, data interpretation, writing and review of the manuscript. AP provided care for the study patient, contributed to data collection, interpretation, and review of the manuscript. SFM provided care for the study patient, contributed to data collection, interpretation, review of manuscript and correspondence between patient and research team.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.