Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Measurement of the stiffness of endoscopes—a plea for commonality
  1. G D BELL
  1. K BURN
  1. Sunderland University Medical Sciences Faculty
  2. University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
  3. School of Computing, Engineering and Technology
  4. University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
  1. Professor GD Bell, Endoscopy Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland SR4 7TP, UK.duncan_bell{at}compuserve.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Editor,—In a previous issue (OpenUrlPubMed), Brooker and colleagues described their experience with an exciting new variable stiffness colonoscope. They made the point that a stiffer colonoscope shaft reduces recurrent looping but makes passage through an angulated sigmoid more difficult and causes more stretching and hence pain when loops do occur. Conversely, the more flexible thinner paediatric instruments are better for negotiating a fixed or narrow sigmoid colon but then tend to allow recurrent loop formation later in the procedure. Their randomised trial using either a standard Olympus CF200HL (13.3 mm shaft diameter) or a prototype (Olympus XCF-SH230L—12.9 mm shaft diameter) variable stiffness colonoscope looked very promising although in one case a paediatric Olympus PCF230I (11.3 mm shaft diameter) was required …

View Full Text