Skip to main content
Log in

Territorial Structure and Organization of Agriculture in Tyumen Oblast in 1973 and 2014: Comparative Analysis

  • REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reduction in agricultural areas is a vivid manifestation of the spatial contraction of post-Soviet Russia’s socio-geographical space. Based on a case study of Tyumen oblast, the author examines the changes in the territorial structure of agriculture. He compares agricultural indicators in two time slices: 1973 and 2014. The sources for the work were the 1976 Atlas of Tyumen Oblast, Rosstat statistical materials, and also freely accessible Rosstat data on the accounting statements of enterprises. The results of the study showed that individual elements of the spatial structure of agrarian industry established in the Soviet period have been preserved and reproduced in modern conditions. The transition to the market led to the spatial contraction of agrarian production; however, the structure of sown areas remains close to the early 1960s model, where in terms of farm distribution, the prior cores and confinedness to large landscape and transport axes remain. Major shifts have been revealed in how the contribution of individual territories to gross regional product is distributed. The main revenue in the region’s agricultural sector is concentrated with a small number of agroindustrial enterprises located close to the regional capital. This indicates (1) an increased dependence of the location of production on the accessibility to a large city as a source of qualified personnel and a market outlet, and (2) an altered model of organizing production, towards its greater centralization and strict specialization, as well as a functional distinction between head (processing) and subsidiary (raw materials) companies united in a closed production chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is done without consideration of autonomous districts.

  2. In this case, the records for Tyumen oblast are presented with account for autonomous districts. For these years, no separate information is available on the dynamics of the agricultural enterprises structure for the south of this region.

REFERENCES

  1. Averkieva, K.V., Geography of adaptation processes in rural areas of the Non-Chernozem Area at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2012.

  2. Atlas Tyumenskoi oblasti (Atlas of Tyumen Oblast), Moscow: Glav Upr. Geodez. Kartogr., Sov. Minist. SSSR, 1976, no. 2.

  3. Barsukova, S.Yu., Dilemma “farmers vs. agricultural holdings” in the context of import substitution, Obshch. Nauki Sovrem., 2016, no. 5, pp. 63–74.

  4. Kalugina, Z.I., Inversion of rural employment: practice and policy, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2012, no. 2, pp. 45–67.

  5. Kuz’minov, I.F. and Nefedova, T.G., The concentration of production facilities in the agro-industrial and timber industry complexes and the polarization of Russian space, Vestn. Agro, 2012, no. 1, pp. 76–90.

  6. Lyuri, D.I., Goryachkin, S.V., Karavaeva, N.A., Denisenko, E.A., and Nefedova, T.G., Dinamika sel’skokhozyaistvennykh zemel’ v Rossii v XX veke i postagrogennoe vosstanovlenie rastitel’nosti i pochv (Dynamics of Agricultural Lands in Russia in the 20th Century and Postagrogenic Rehabilitation of Vegetation and Soils), Moscow: GEOS, 2010.

  7. Nefedova, T.G., Desyat’ aktual’nykh voprosov o sel’skoi Rossii: otvety geografa (Ten Topical Issues about Rural Russia: A Geographer’s Viewpoint), Moscow: Lenand, 2014.

  8. Semenov, E.A. and Chibilev, A.A., Jr., Spatial and structural transformation of the agro-economic complex of Orenburg oblast as a factor of the formation of unclaimed land fund, in Voprosy geografii. Vyp. 141: Problemy regional’nogo razvitiya Rossii (Problems of Geography, No. 141: Problems of Regional Development of Russia), Kotlyakov, V.M., Streletskiy, V.N., Glezer, O.B., and Safronov, S.G., Eds., Moscow: Kodeks, 2016, pp. 471–484.

  9. Sheludkov, A.V. and Rasskazov, S.V., A map of multiple pattern of life: suburban and peripheral zones of Tyumen oblast, Krest’yanovedenie, 2017, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bogachev, D.V., Transformation of the agriculture in Russia: Significance of present-day vertical integration, Reg. Res. Russ., 2015, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 392–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iammarino, S., Rodriguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M., Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications, J. Econ. Geogr., 2019, vol. 2, no. 19, pp. 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ioffe, G., Nefedova, T., and Zaslavsky, I., From spatial continuity to fragmentation: the case of Russian farming, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 2004, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 913–943.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karachurina, L.B. and Mkrtchyan, N.V. The role of migration in enhancing settlement pattern contrasts at the municipal level in Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2016, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaz’min, M.A., Transformation of agricultural land use in Russian regions in the course of modern socioeconomic reforms, Reg. Res. Russ., 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhling, I., Broll, G., and Trautz, D., Spatio-temporal analysis of agricultural land-use intensity across the Western Siberian grain belt, Sci. Total Environ., 2016, vol. 544, pp. 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kühn, M., Peripheralization: theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities, Eur. Plan. Stud., 2015, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang, T., Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarization and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: a research agenda, Hung. Geogr. Bull., 2015, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang, T. and Haunstein, S., Wachsende regionale Polarisierung in Europa, Natl. Aktuell, 2017, vol. 8, no. 11.

  19. Leibert, T., The peripheralization of rural areas in post-socialist Central Europe: a case of fragmenting development? Lessons from rural Hungary, in Peripheralization, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2013, pp. 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lesiv, M., et al., Spatial distribution of arable and abandoned land across former Soviet Union countries, Sci. Data, 2018, vol. 5, p. 180 056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nefedova, T.G., Twenty-five years of Russia’s post-Soviet agriculture: geographical trends and contradictions, Reg. Res. Russ., 2017, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Prishchepov, A.V., Müller, D., Dubinin, M., Baumann, M., and Radeloff, V.C., Determinants of agricultural land abandonment in post-Soviet European Russia, Land Use Policy, 2013, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 873–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Swinnen, J., et al., Production potential in the “bread baskets” of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Global Food Security, 2017, vol. 14, pp. 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, Naumann, M. and Fischer-Tahir, A., Eds., New York: Springer-Verlag, 2013.

  25. Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization: Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and Beyond, Lang, T., , Eds., London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation: Re-thinking Spatial Policies in Europe, Lang, T. and Görmar, F., Eds., Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

Statistical Data and Informational Sources

  1. Database of municipal indicators, Russian Federal Statistical Service, 2017. http://www.gks.ru/dbscripts/ munst/. Accessed December 12, 2017.

  2. Accounting (financial) statements of enterprises and organizations, 2012–2015, Russian Federal Statistical Service, 2016. http://www.gks.ru/opendata/ dataset?tags=Бухгалтерская+отчетность. Accessed December 12, 2017.

  3. Narodnoe khozyaistvo Tyumenskoi oblasti za 70 let (National Economics of Tyumen Oblast over 70 Years), Tyumen: Stat. Upr. Tyumen. Obl., 1987.

  4. Narodnoe khozyaistvo Tyumenskoi oblasti za 60 let (National Economics of Tyumen Oblast over 60 Years), Tyumen: Stat. Upr. Tyumen. Obl., 1977.

  5. Razvitie sel’skogo khozyaistva Tyumenskoi oblasti v 1986–1990 gg.: Statisticheskii sbornik (Development of Agriculture in Tyumen Oblast in 1986–1990: Statistical Handbook), Tyumen: Stat. Upr. Tyumen. Obl., 1991.

  6. Regiony Rossii. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli. 2005: Statisticheskii sbornik (Russian Regions: Social-Economic Indices, 2005: Statistical Handbook), Moscow: Rosstat, 2006.

  7. Regiony Rossii. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli. 2016: Statisticheskii sbornik (Russian Regions: Social-Economic Indices, 2016: Statistical Handbook), Moscow: Rosstat, 2016.

  8. Sel’skoe khozyaistvo: osnovnye itogi za 1965–1990 gg. (Agriculture: General Results for 1965–1990), Tyumen: Stat. Upr. Tyumen. Obl., 1990.

  9. Statisticheskii ezhegodnik. Tom 2. Tyumenskaya oblast’ (Statistical Yearbook, Vol. 2: Tyumen Oblast), Tyumen: Territ. Org., Fed. Sluzhby Gos. Stat. Tyumen. Obl., 2016.

Software

  1. Baddeley, A., Rubak, E., and Turner, R., Spatial Point Patterns: Methodology and Applications with R, London: CRC Press, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bivand, R. and Lewin-Koh, N., maptools: Tools for reading and handling spatial objects, R package version 0.9-2, 2017. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maptools. Accessed December 26, 2017.

  3. Hijmans, R.J., raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling, R package version 2.5-8, 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster. Accessed December 26, 2017.

  4. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna: R Found. Stat. Comput., 2016. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed December 26, 2017.

Download references

Funding

The work was performed as part of the state task of the Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences (no. 0148-2019-0008) and RAS Presidium Program “Contribution of Social Sciences and Humanities for Russia’s Stable Development and Its Strategic Breakthrough”(subprogram “Spatial Restructuring of Russia with Regard to Geopolitical, Socioeconomic, and Geoecological Challenges”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Sheludkov.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

An expanded version of the article published in Regional’nye Issledovaniya, 2017, no. 4, pp. 93–104.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheludkov, A.V. Territorial Structure and Organization of Agriculture in Tyumen Oblast in 1973 and 2014: Comparative Analysis. Reg. Res. Russ. 9, 278–287 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519030080

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519030080

Keywords:

Navigation