Skip to main content
Log in

Siberian Federal District: What Impedes Economic Growth?

  • Regional Development
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper discusses how to restore economic growth in the regions of the Siberian Federal District (SFD). It is shown that in 2014–2016 the positions of SFD regions have worsened in most of their indicators. The shares of the SFD in gross regional product, employment, and fixed assets have decreased. An emerging tendency is the decline in the technological level of industry. The consumer market and fixed capital investment are undergoing greater contractions in the SFD than in the rest of Russia. Analysis of the dynamics in public debt and deficits in the consolidated budgets of federal subjects of the SFD shows that these subjects do not have sufficient financial resources for a proactive policy for stimulating economic growth. Recommendations are given on how to reduce the impact of the existing adverse trends in different economic sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akindinova, N. and Yasin, E., A new stage in the development of the economy in post-Soviet Russia, Vopr. Ekon., 2015, no. 5, pp. 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basaraeva, V.G., Russian regions: adaptation to governmental regulation, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2015, no. 2 (86), pp. 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belousov, D., Economic insufficiency. https://doi.org/www.kommersant.ru/doc/2901217. Accessed March 15, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belousov, D.R., Belkina, T.D., Blokhin, A.A., et al., Vosstanovlenie ekonomicheskogo rosta v Rossii (Renew of Economic Growth in Russia), Moscow: Inst. Narodokhoz. Prognoz., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glaz’ev, S.Yu., O neotlozhnykh merakh po ukrepleniyu ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti Rossii i vyvodu rossiskoi ekonomiki na traektoriyu operezhayushchego razvitiya (On Urgent Measures to Strengthen Economic Security of Russia and Placing Russia’s Economy in Advanced Development Trajectory), Moscow: Inst. Ekon. Strategii, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gurvich, E., Development of macroeconomic policy in Russia: progress and problems, XVII Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva (XVII Int. Sci. Conf. on the Problems of Development of Economics and Society), Moscow: NRU HSE, 2016. https://doi.org/conf.hse.ru/data/2016/04/14/1129618660/%D0%9C%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%8D%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%-BD%D0%BE%D0%-BC%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%-B0.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zubarevich, N.V., Regiony Rossii: neravenstvo, krizis, modernizatsiya (Russian Regions: Disparity, Crisis, and Modernization), Moscow: Nezavisimyi Inst. Sots. Polit., 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ivanter, V.V., Strategy of transition to economic growth, Studies on Rus. Econ. Development, 2016, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kudrin, A. and Gurvich, E., A new growth model for the Russian economy, Vopr. Ekon., 2014, no. 12, pp. 4–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuznetsova, O.V., Regional’naya politika Rossii: 20 let reform i novye vozmozhnosti (Regional Policy of Russia: 20 Years of Reforms and New Opportunities), Moscow: Librokom, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leksin, V.N. and Porfir’ev, B.N., Evaluation of the effectiveness of government programs of socioeconomic development of regions of Russia, Studies on Rus. Econ. Development, 2016, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lenchuk, E.B., Course on new industrialization: a global trend of economic development, Studies on Rus. Econ. Development, 2016, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mikheeva, N.N., Regional proportions of economic growth in Russia, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2008, no. 2, pp. 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rossiiskie regiony: ekonomicheskii krizis i problemy modernizatsii (Russian Regions: Economic Crisis and Problems of Modernization), Grigor’ev, L.M., Zubarevich, N.V., and Khasaev, G.R., Eds., Moscow: TEIS, 2011.

  15. Seliverstov, V.E., Sibirskaya shkola strategicheskogo planirovaniya (Siberian School of Strategic Planning), Kuleshov, V.V., Ed., Novosibirsk: Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod., Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sovremennaya rol’ ekonomiki Sibiri v narodnokhozyaistvennom komplekse Rossii (Modern Role of Economy of Siberia in the National Economic Complex of Russia), Kuleshov, V.V., Ed., Novosibirsk: Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod., Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2014.

  17. Shvetsov, A.N., Sovershenstvovanie regional’noi politiki: kontseptsiya i praktika (Improvement of Regional Policy: Concept and Practice), Moscow: Librokom, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krugman, P.R., First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location, J. Reg. Sci., 1993, vol. 33, pp. 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sala-i-Martin, X., The classical approach to convergence analysis, Econ. J., 1996, vol. 106, pp. 1019–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. G. Basareva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.G. Basareva, N.N. Mikheeva, 2017, published in Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya, 2017, No. 2 (94), pp. 104–125.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basareva, V.G., Mikheeva, N.N. Siberian Federal District: What Impedes Economic Growth?. Reg. Res. Russ. 8, 184–192 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518020028

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518020028

Keywords

Navigation