Abstract
The Hamiltonian of the sd version of the interacting boson model (sd IBM) is written in the consistent-Q-form and used to establish the nuclear shape phase transitional structures. The potential energy surfaces (PES’s) corresponding to the consistent-Q Hamiltonian are obtained by using the intrinsic coherent state formalism which introduces the shape variables \(\beta \) and \(\gamma \). The quadrupole–quadrupole interaction is constructed in terms of a new external factor as a linear function of the total number of bosons. The effect of this factor on the position of critical points is studied. We showed that the critical points take different positions for different choice of this external factor, the larger the factor value the smaller the critical point value. For applications to our model, the Erbium (Er) and Ruthenium (Ru) isotopic chains are taken as an examples in illustrating the U(5)–Su(3) and U(5)–O(6) shape phase transitions respectively. Some selected energy levels and reduced E2 transition probabilities B(E2) for each nucleus are calculated to adjust the model parameters by using a simulated computer search fitting program to fit the experimental data with the IBM calculations by minimizing the root mean square deviation between the experimental energies and reduced electric quadrupole transition probabilities and the calculated ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
F. Iachello and A. Arima, The Interacting Boson Model (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge UK, 1987).
D. Bonatsos, Interacting Boson Models of Nuclear Structure (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988).
I. Talmi, Simple Models of Complex Nuclei The Shell Model and Interacting Boson Models (Harwood Academic, 1993).
A. Arima and F. Iachello, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 99, 253 (1976);
Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 111, 201 (1978);
Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 123, 468 (1979).
R. F. Casten, Nuclear Structure from a Simple Perspectives (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1990).
D Warner, Nature (London, U.K.) 420, 614 (2002).
J. Jolie et al., Phys. Lett. 89, 182502 (2002).
P. Cejnar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 112501 (2003).
J. M. Arias, J. Dukelsky, and J. E. Gracia Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 162502 (2003).
F. Iachello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20, 2687 (2006).
R. F. Casten, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 183 (2009).
J. Barea, J. M. Arias, and J. E. Garcia Ramos, Phys. Rev. C 82, 024316 (2010).
A. M. Khalaf et al., Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 13, 163 (2016).
A. M. Khalaf et al., Nucl. Phys. A 991, 121610 (2019).
A. M. Khalaf et al., Nucl. Phys. A 997, 121719 (2020).
A. M. Khalaf, A. M. Ismail, and A. A. Zaki, Nucl. Phys. A 996, 121704 (2020).
J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1744 (1980).
J. N. Ginocchio, Nucl. Phys. A 376, 438 (1982).
A. E. L. Dieperink, O. Scholten, and F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1747 (1980).
Y. Alhassid and N. Whelan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 816 (1991).
Y. Alassid and N. Whelan, Phys. Rev. C 43, 2637 (1991).
A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (Benjamin, New York, 1975), Vol. 2.
G. Gneuss, U. Mosel, and W. Greiner, Phys. Lett. B 30, 397 (1969);
Phys. Lett. B 31, 269 (1970).
G. Gneuss and W. Greiner, Nucl. Phys. A 171, 449 (1971).
A. M. Khalaf and A. M. Ismail, Prog. Phys. 2, 51 (2013); Prog. Phys. 2, 98 (2013).
M. Kotb, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 13, 451 (2016).
F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3580 (2000).
F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052502 (2001).
R. F. Casten and D. D. Warner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 389 (1988);
E. Rossensteel, Phys. Rev. C 41, 730 (1990).
K. Hayde et al., Phys. Rev. C 29, 1420 (1984).
A. M. Khalaf, M. Kotb, and H. A. Ghanim, Indian J. Phys. 94, 2033 (2020).
D. D. Warner and R. F. Casten, Phys. Rev. C 28, 1798 (1983).
N. Whelan and Y. Alhassid, Nucl. Phys. A 556, 42 (1993).
N. V. Zamfir et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 021304 (2002).
N. V. Zamfir, E. A. McCutohen, and R. F. Casten, Phys. At. Nucl. 67, 1829 (2004).
A. M. Khalaf and M. M. Taha, J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 9, 127 (2015).
I. Iachello, N. V. Zamfir, and R. F. Casten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1191 (1998).
E. William, R. J. Casperson, and V. Werner, Phys. Rev. C 81, 054306 (2010).
A. A. Abdalaty, M. Kotb, M. D. Okasha, and A. M. Khalaf, Phys. At. Nucl. 83, 849 (2020).
M. D. Okasha, Int. J. Adv. Res. Phys. Sci. 2, 59 (2015).
O. Scholten, Computer Code PHINT, KVI (Groningen, 1980).
W. H. Press, B. P. Flonnery, S. A. Teukalsly, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Relipes (Labridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1986), p. 294.
National Nuclear Data Center NNDC, Brookhaven National Laboratory. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/.
M. A. Al-Jubbari et al., Indian J. Phys. 94, 379 (2020).
A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Den. Mat. Fys. Medd. 30 (1) (1955).
M. A. J. Mariscotti, G. Scharf-Goldheber, and B. Buck, Phys. Rev. 178, 1864 (1969).
M. Sakai, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nuclear Structure: Coexistence of Single Particle and Collective Type Excitation, Balatonfured, Hungary, 1975 (Budapest, 1976), Vol. 1.
I. N. Mikhailov, P. Quentin, and D. Samsoem, Nucl. Phys. A 627, 259 (1997).
M. Boyukata, P. van Isacker, and I. Uluer, J. Phys. G 37, 105102 (2010).
A. Frank, C. E. Alonso and J. M. Arias, Phys. Rev. C 65, 014301 (2001).
A. M. Khalaf et al., Phys. At. Nucl. 83, 866 (2020).
A. M. Khalaf, M. Sirag, and M. Kotb, Commun. Theor. Phys. 64, 90 (2015).
A. M. Khalaf, M. Kotb, and T. M. Awwad, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 26, 1750011 (2017).
D. Troltenier et al., Nucl. Phys. A 601, 56 (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramadan, M., Khalaf, A.M., Kotb, M. et al. Nuclear Shape Phase Transitions Using IBM Applied to Erbium and Ruthenium Nuclei. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 18, 527–539 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477121050095
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477121050095