Abstract
A certain quadratic gravity model provides a successfully inflationary scenario. The inflation is driven by the new scalar degree of freedom called scalaron. After the end of inflation the scalaron decays in matter and dark matter degrees of freedom reheating the Universe. We study new channels by which the scalaron can transfer energy to the matter sector. These channels are annihilation and decay via intermediate graviton states. Results are obtained within perturbative quantum gravity. In the heavy scalaron limit only scalar particles are produced by the annihilation channel. Scalaron decays in all types of particles are allowed. In the light scalaron limit decay channel is strongly suppressed. Boson production via the annihilation channel is expected to be dominant at the early stages of reheating, while fermion production will dominate later stages.
REFERENCES
A. Accioly, S. Ragusa, H. Mukai, and E. C. de Rey Neto, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39, 1599 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003632311419
A. Hindawi, B. A. Ovrut, and D. Waldram, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5583 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5583
R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 125, 2163 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.125.2163
K. i. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3159 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.39.3159
V. Faraoni, E. Gunzig, and P. Nardone, Fund. Cosm. Phys. 20, 121 (1999).
A. de Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel. 13, 3 (2010). https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2010-3
A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X
Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collab.), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833887
P. A. R. Ade et al. (BICEP and Keck. Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151301
D. Paoletti, F. Finelli, J. Valiviita, and M. Hazumi, arXiv: 2208.10482 [astro-ph.CO].
G. Galloni, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, M. Migliaccio, A. Ricciardone, and N. Vittorio, arXiv: 2208.00188 [astro-ph.CO].
A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2511 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2511
A. S. Koshelev, L. Modesto, L. Rachwal, and A. A. Starobinsky, J. High Energy Phys., No. 11, 067 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2016)067
E. V. Arbuzova, A. D. Dolgov, and L. Reverberi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., No. 02, 049 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/02/049
E. V. Arbuzova, A. D. Dolgov, and R. S. Singh, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., No. 07, 019 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/019
E. Arbuzova, A. Dolgov, and R. Singh, Symmetry 13, 877 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13050877
B. N. Latosh, Phys. Part. Nucl. 51, 859 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779620050056
C. P. Burgess, Living Rev. Rel. 7, 5 (2004). https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2004-5
M. Levi, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 075901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab12bc
X. Calmet, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 22, 1342014 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271813420145
P. Vanhove, arXiv: 2104.10148 [gr-qc].
G. ‘t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A 20, 69 (1974)
M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B 160, 81 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91470-4
D. Prinz, Class. Quantum Grav. 38, 215003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac1cc9
B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. 162, 1239 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.162.1239
S. Sannan, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1749 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1749
G. ‘t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A 20, 69 (1974).
M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B 160, 81 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91470-4
D. Prinz, Class. Quantum Grav. 38, 215003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac1cc9
B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. 162, 1239 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.162.1239
S. Sannan, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1749 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1749
B. Latosh, Class. Quantum Grav. 39, 165006 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac7e15
R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(91)90130-D
V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107478 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107478
H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 276 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.08.017
H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218, 66 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.04.015
V. Shtabovenko, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218, 48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.04.014
S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. 115, 1741 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.115.1741
S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. 112, 1344 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.112.1344
S. M. Bilenky, Introduction to Feynman Diagrams and Electroweak Interactions Physics (Nauka, Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].
S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005).
M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
Y. B. Zeldovich, Adv. Astron. Astrophys. 3, 241 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4831-9921-4.50011-9
B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 165 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.165
G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B 160, 151 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(79)90234-715
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is grateful to A. Arbuzov, E. Arbuzova, and A. Dolgov for fruitful discussions.
Funding
The work was supported by the RSCF grant 22-22-00294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Latosh, B.N. Scalaron Decay in Perturbative Quantum Gravity. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 136, 555–566 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776123050023
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776123050023