Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Event Related Potentials’ Characteristics in the Different Models of Verbal Creative Thinking

  • Experimental Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The comparative study of three different models of creative thinking in unified event-related (ERP) paradigm is presented. The subjects (18–35 years old) performed the following tasks: PROVERBS (a divergent creative task to overcome stereotypes of long-term memory), REMOTE ASSOCIATIONS (a convergent creative task activating remote semantic fields), ALTERNATIVE USES TASK (a divergent creative task with the initiation of the associative search process). In the creative tasks, subjects required to create an original ending to a proverb (Pr), find a word that could be matched with three presented words from different semantic fields (RAT), invent original ways of using common objects (AUT). In the control tasks subjects were required to recall a well-known ending to a proverb (PrM), and to list/name objects from a given category (CAT). The ERP amplitudes were analyzed when comparing the tasks with each other. Greater negativity was observed for the a component with around 300 ms latency (~N300) in frontal regions (280–346 ms after stimuli onset) in the Pr task, which probably reflects inhibition of the patterns of long-term memory. In the Pr and RAT tasks, semantic retrieval and integration of new information versus retrieval of known information from memory (PrM) was characterized by lower amplitude values of late components at the 698–786 ms interval. The greater amplitude of late ERP components in parietal regions (524–624 ms) during divergent thinking (AUT) may correspond to the greater emergence of images in this task compared to more abstract RAT and Pr tasks. Thus, even in the early stages of information processing in verbal creative tasks performance, the specificity of different models of creative thinking appears in the same temporal paradigm and similar visual stimuli presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. Runco MA, Jaeger GJ (2012) The standard definition of creativity. Creat Res J 24: 92–96.https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guilford JP (1967) The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guilford JP (1962) Potentiality for creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly 6: 87–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Torrance EP (2000) Research review for the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Figural and Verbal forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mednick S (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psycholog Rev 69: 220–232.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu CL, Huang SY, Chen PZ, Chen HC (2020) A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019. Front Psychol 11: 573432.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vitrano D, Altarriba J, Leblebici-Basar D (2021) Revisiting Mednick’s (1962) Theory of Creativity with a Composite Measure of Creativity: The Effect of Stimulus Type on Word Association Production. J Creat Behavior 55: 925–936.https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bekhtereva NP (2006) The magic of creativity and psychophysiology. Facts, considerations, hypotheses. Publishing house “Institute of Human Brain RAS”, St-Petersburg, 79. (In Russ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ushakov DV (2011) Psychology of intelligence and talent. Publishing house “Institute of Psychology RAS”, M, 464. (In Russ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bechtereva NP (2009) The usefulness of psychophysiology in the maintenance of cognitive life. Int J Psychophysiol 73: 83–87.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kraus B, Cadle C, Simon-Dack S (2019) EEG alpha activity is moderated by the serial order effect during divergent thinking. Biol Psychol 145: 84–95.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agnoli S, Zanon M, Mastria S, Avenanti A, Corazza GE (2020) Predicting response originality through brain activity: An analysis of changes in EEG alpha power during the generation of alternative ideas. Neuroimage 207: 116385.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang M, Hao N, Ku Y, Grabner RH, Fink A (2017) Neural correlates of serial order effect in verbal divergent thinking. Neuropsychologia 99: 92–100.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagy B, Czigler I, Csizmadia P, File D, Fáy N, Gaál ZA (2023) Investigating the involvement of cognitive control processes in innovative and adaptive creativity and their age-related changes. Front Hum Neurosci 17: 1033508.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1033508

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Benedek M, Schickel RJ, Jauk E, Fink A, Neubauer AC (2014) Alpha power increases in right parietal cortex reflects focused internal attention. Neuropsychologia 56: 393–400.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Heinonen J, Numminen J, Hlushchuk Y, Antell H, Taatila V, Suomala J (2016) Default Mode and Executive Networks Areas: Association with the Serial Order in Divergent Thinking. PLoS One 11: e0162234.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zabelina DL, Friedman NP, Andrews-Hanna J (2019) Unity and diversity of executive functions in creativity. Conscious Cogn 68: 47–56.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.12.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Palmiero M, Fusi G, Crepaldi M, Borsa VM, Rusconi ML (2022) Divergent thinking and the core executive functions: a state-of-the-art review. Cogn Process 23: 341–366.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01091-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shemyakina NV, Danko SG, Nagornova ZhV, Starchenko MG, Bechtereva NP (2007) Changes in the power and coherence spectra of the EEG rhythmic components during solution of a verbal creative task of overcoming a stereotype. Hum Physiol 33: 524–530.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119707050027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shemyakina NV, Nagornova ZV (2020) Does the Instruction “Be Original and Create” Actually Affect the EEG Correlates of Performing Creative Tasks? Hum Physiol 46: 587–596.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119720060092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bowden EM, Jung-Beeman M (2003) Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 35: 634–639.https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Razumnikova OM (2007) Creativity related cortex activity in the remote associates task. Brain Res Bull 73: 96–102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagornova ZV, Galkin VA, Vasenkina VA, Grokhotova AV, Shemyakina NV (2022) Neurophysiological Characteristics of Alternative Uses Task Performance by Means of ERP and ERS/ERD Data Analysis Depending on the Subject’s Productivity and Originality Levels. Hum Physiol 48: 609–632.https://doi.org/10.1134/S036211972270013X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shemyakina NV, Nagornova ZhV (2020) Event-related changes in EEG spectral power corresponding to creative and trivial decisions. Russ J Physiol 106: 880–889.https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869813920070067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shemyakina NV, Nagornova ZV (2019) EEG “Signs” of Verbal Creative Task Fulfillment with and without Overcoming Self-Induced Stereotypes. Behav Sci (Basel) 10(1): 17.https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010017

  26. Voronin AN, Galkina TV (1994) Diagnostics of verbal creativity (adaptation of the Mednik test). In: Voronin AN (Ed) Methods of psychological diagnostics. Collection of articles; Issue 2. Izd-vo “Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, Moscow, 40–81. eLIBRARY ID: 45827497

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vigario RN (1997) Extraction of ocular artefacts from EEG using independent component analysis. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 103(3): 395–404.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00042-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jung TP, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee TW, McKeown MJ, Iragui V, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37: 163–178.https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3720163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tereshchenko EP, Ponomarev VA, Kropotov YD, Müller A (2009) Comparative efficiencies of different methods for removing blink artifacts in analyzing quantitative electroencephalogram and event-related potentials. Hum Physiol 35: 241–247.https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709020157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kozhushko NJ, Nagornova ZV, Evdokimov SA, Shemyakina NV, Ponomarev VA, Tereshchenko EP, Kropotov JD (2018) Specificity of spontaneous EEG associated with different levels of cognitive and communicative dysfunctions in children. Int J Psychophysiol 128: 22–30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Folstein JR, Van Petten C (2008) Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45: 152–170https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hinault T, Larcher K, Zazubovits N, Gotman J, Dagher A (2019) Spatio-temporal patterns of cognitive control revealed with simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 40: 80–97.https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McPherson WB, Holcomb PJ (1999) An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology 36: 53–65.https://doi.org/10.1017/s0048577299971196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hamm JP, Johnson BW, Kirk IJ (2002) Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clin Neurophysiol 113: 1339–1350.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00161-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma Q, Hu L, Xiao C, Bian J, Jin J, Wang Q (2016) Neural correlates of multimodal metaphor comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials and time-frequency decompositions. Int J Psychophysiol 109: 81–91.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Franklin MS, Dien J, Neely JH, Huber E, Waterson LD (2007) Semantic priming modulates the N400, N300, and N400RP. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 1053–1068.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Debruille JB (2007) The N400 potential could index a semantic inhibition. Brain Res Rev 56: 472–477.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Debruille JB, Ramirez D, Wolf Y, Schaefer A, Nguyen TV, Bacon BA, Renoult L, Brodeur M (2008) Knowledge inhibition and N400: a within- and a between-subjects study with distractor words. Brain Res 1187: 167–183.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Xiao X, Qiu J, Zhang Q (2009) The dissociation of neural circuits in a Stroop task. Neuroreport 20: 674–678.https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832a0a10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wei D, Qiu J, Tu S, Tian F, Su Y, Luo Y (2010) Earthquake experience interference effects in a modified Stroop task: an ERP study. Neurosci Lett 474: 121–125.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.03.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang W, Li B, Gao C, Guo C (2018) The temporal dynamics of perceptual and conceptual fluency on recognition memory. Brain Cogn 127: 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2018.07.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Abraham A, Rutter B, Hermann C (2021) Conceptual expansion via novel metaphor processing: An ERP replication and extension study examining individual differences in creativity. Brain Lang 221: 105007.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kröger S, Rutter B, Hill H, Windmann S, Hermann C, Abraham A (2013) An ERP study of passive creative conceptual expansion using a modified alternate uses task. 1Brain Res 1527: 189–198.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Proverbio AM, Crotti N, Zani A, Adorni R (2009) The role of left and right hemispheres in the comprehension of idiomatic language: an electrical neuroimaging study. BMC Neurosci 10: 116.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Petten CV, Kutas M, Kluender R, Mitchiner M, McIsaac H (1991) Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 3: 131–150.https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hsu CH, Lee CY (2023) Reduction or enhancement? Repetition effects on early brain potentials during visual word recognition are frequency dependent. Front Psychol 14: 994903.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.994903

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Peng Y, Liu Y, Guo C (2019) Examining the neural mechanism behind testing effect with concrete and abstract words. Neuroreport 30: 113–119.https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Project no. 22-28-02073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia

    N. V. Shemyakina & Zh. V. Nagornova

Authors
  1. N. V. Shemyakina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zh. V. Nagornova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Idea of the paper and planning of experiments (N.V.S.), data recording, processing and analysis (N.V.S., Zh.V.N.), writing and editing of the manuscript (N.V.S., Zh.V.N.).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. V. Shemyakina.

Ethics declarations

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

All research conducted with subjects complied with the ethical standards of the National Research Ethics Committee and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions. The subjects gave voluntary informed consent to participate in the studies. The procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute (IEFB RAS)—#2-02 dated February 02, 2022.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by A. Dyomina

Publisher’s Note. Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shemyakina, N.V., Nagornova, Z.V. Event Related Potentials’ Characteristics in the Different Models of Verbal Creative Thinking. J Evol Biochem Phys 60, 453–465 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093024020029

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0022093024020029

Keywords:

Search

Navigation