Abstract
Electron microscopy remains the gold standard for studying the nervous system, as it allows adequate spatial resolution imaging of the finer structures of nervous tissues. Despite the high resolution, correct interpretation of electron microscopy images is only possible with sufficient contrast of unit membranes, cytosolic components and the cytoskeleton, which is achieved using hazardous reagents and heavy metals. Earlier, a solution of dry oolong tea extract was introduced as a replacement for toxic and radioactive uranyl acetate. However, staining with oolong extract showed less contrast of intracellular organelles. It is known that depending on the specimen nature and the experimental conditions, different tissues have unequal ability to capture the stain. Here, oolong tea extract staining of early postnatal and adult rat brain tissue was used for the first time to evaluate it with transmission electron microscopy. We found that oolong extract obtained from freshly prepared tea is equal to conventional stains in section staining and has several advantages. We showed that its use on the immature brain allows the finest details of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum of neurons to be revealed. Also, in combination with osmication with potassium ferricyanide and cacodylate buffer, it provides better visualization of the neuronal cytoskeleton and the smooth cisternae in the terminal astrocytic lamellae. A conventional chemical fixation protocol followed by staining with a saturated oolong tea water extract is also well suited for routine studies of the brain of adult animals, as well as for multiple grids batch staining.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
T. J. Deerinck, E. A. Bushong, V. Lev-Ram, et al., Microsc. Microanal. 16, 1138 (2010).
J. C. Tapia, N. Kasthuri, K. J. Hayworth, et al., Nat. Protoc. 7, 193 (2012).
S. Mikula and W. Denk, Nat. Methods 12, 541 (2015).
Y. Hua, P. Laserstein, and M. Helmstaedter, Nat. Commun. 6, 7923 (2015).
Y. Kubota, J. Sohn, S. Hatada, et al., Nat. Commun. 9, 437 (2018).
M. Colonnier, Brain Res. 9, 268 (1968).
E. G. Gray, J. Anat. 93, 420 (1959).
A. M. Seligman, H. L. Wasserkrug, and J. S. Hanker, J. Cell Biol. 30, 424 (1966).
L. de Vivo, M. Bellesi, W. Marshall, et al., Science 355, 507 (2017).
E. Kim, J. Lee, S. Noh, et al., Appl. Microsc. 50, 14 (2020).
S. Sato, Y. Sasaki, A. Adachi, et al., Med. Electron Microsc. 36, 179 (2003).
S. Sato, A. Adachi, Y. Sasaki, and M. Ghazizadeh, J. Microsc. 229, 17 (2008).
A. A. Miller and A. V. Simakova, Cell Tissue Biol. 4, 109 (2010).
K. Yamaguchi, K.-I. Suzuki, and K. Tanaka, J. Electron Microsc. 59, 113 (2010).
X. He and B. I. N. Liu, J. Microsc. 267, 27 (2017).
C. Pinali, H. Bennett, J. B. Davenport, et al., Circ. Res. 113, 1219 (2013).
Y. Wu, C. Whiteus, C. S. Xu, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, E4859 (2017).
V. V. Rogachevskii, Cell Tissue Biol. 7, 487 (2013).
T. Hanaichi, T. Sato, T. Iwamoto, et al., J. Electron Microsc. 35, 304 (1986).
V. I. Popov, H. A. Davies, V. V. Rogachevsky, et al., Neuroscience 128, 251 (2004).
M. G. Stewart, H. A. Davies, C. Sandi, et al., Neuroscience 131, 43 (2005).
A. Cardona, S. Saalfeld, J. Schindelin, et al., PLoS One 7, e38011 (2012).
E. Kawana, C. Sandri, and K. Akert, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie 115, 284 (1971).
M. Z. Chauhan, J. Arcuri, K. K. Park, et al., iScience 23, 100836 (2020).
M. A. Hayat, Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy: Biological Applications (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
M. J. Karnovsky, in 11th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology, Abstracts 284, 146 (1971).
L. A. Langford and R. E. Coggeshall, Anat. Rec. 197, 297 (1980).
J. Spacek and K. M. Harris, J. Neurosci. 17, 190 (1997).
J. R. Cooney, J. L. Hurlburt, D. K. Selig, et al., J. Neurosci. 22, 2215 (2002).
T. Cui-Wang, C. Hanus, T. Cui, et al., Cell 148, 309 (2012).
N. Jimenez, K. Vocking, E. G. van Donselaar, et al., J. Struct. Biol. 166, 103 (2009).
M. Nakakoshi, H. Nishioka, and E. Katayama, J. Electron Microsc. 60, 401 (2011).
N. Hosogi, H. Nishioka, and M. Nakakoshi, Microscopy 64, 429 (2015).
K. Inoue, Y. Muranaka, P. Park, and H. Yasuda, in Proceedings of the European Microscopy Congress (2016).
J. Kuipers and B. N. G. Giepmans, Histochem. Cell Biol. 153, 271 (2020).
A. L. Pinto, R. K. Rai, A. Shoemark, et al., Diagnostics 11, 1063 (2021).
A. Moscardini, S. Di Pietro, G. Signore, et al., Sci. Rep. 10, 11540 (2020).
K.-I. Ikeda, K. Inoue, S. Kanematsu, et al., Microsc. Res. Tech. 74, 825 (2011).
N. Benmeradi, B. Payre, and S. L. Goodman, Microsc. Microanal. 21, 721 (2015).
K. Asami, J. Ultrastruct. Mol. Struct. Res. 95, 38 (1986).
R. C. Wagner, J. Ultrastruct. Res. 57, 132 (1976).
B. Fernandez, I. Suarez, and G. Gonzalez, Anat. Anz. 156, 31 (1984).
A. Reichenbach, A. Derouiche, and F. Kirchhoff, Brain Res. Rev. 63, 11 (2010).
B. S. Khakh and M. V. Sofroniew, Nat. Neurosci. 18, 942 (2015).
N. Simionescu and M. Simionescu, J. Cell Biol. 70, 608 (1976a).
N. Fellner, M. Brandstetter, K. Trimmel, and G. Resch, Resolution 1, 8 (2012).
N. Simionescu and M. Simionescu, J. Cell Biol. 70, 622 (1976b).
M. M.-C. Wang, Y. Yeh, Y.-E. Shih, and J. T.-C. Tzen, J. Food Drug Anal. 26, 609 (2018).
M. G. Sajilata, P. R. Bajaj, and R. S. Singhal, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 7, 229 (2008).
M. Nakayama, K. Shimatani, T. Ozawa, et al., Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 79, 845 (2015).
M. P. Borisova, A. A. Kataev, and V. S. Sivozhelezov, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1861, 1103 (2019).
K. M. Pomier, R. Ahmed, and G. Melacini, Molecules 25 (2020).
C. Cabrera, R. Gimenez, and M. C. Lopez, J. Agric. Food Chem. 51, 4427 (2003).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are deeply grateful to Vera G. Tsyganova (ITEB RAS) for her help in handling with neonatal brain and hippocampal material provided. The study was performed at Electron Microscopy Core Facilities of the PSCBR RAS (https://www.pbcras.ru/services/tskp/; http://www.ckp-rf.ru/ckp/670266/), Pushchino, Russia and in Electron Microscopy Suite of the Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Funding
This study was conducted in the framework of the State assignment of PSCBR RAS, project number АААА-А20-120101390069-4, and supported by RFBR, project number 20-34-90068.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Abbreviations: SEM, scanning electron microscopy; OTO, osmium–thiocarbohydrazide–osmium; PSD, postsynaptic density; TEM, transmission-electron microscopy; UAc, uranyl acetate; OTE, oolong tea extract; sER, smooth endoplasmic reticulum; UL, dye based on lanthanide salts (UranyLess).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shishkova, E.A., Kraev, I.V. & Rogachevsky, V.V. Evaluation of Oolong Tea Extract Staining of Brain Tissue with Special Reference to Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum. BIOPHYSICS 67, 752–760 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350922050177
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350922050177