Skip to main content
Log in

Digital Genetics, Variation, Evolvability, and the Evolution of Programmed Aging

  • Phenoptosis
  • Review
  • Published:
Biochemistry (Moscow) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major unresolved issue in gerontology concerns the evolutionary nature of senescence: Is aging caused by genetically programmed evolved mechanisms because limiting individual lifespan increases a population’s ability to survive and grow? Or is aging non-programmed because aging reduces an individual’s ability to survive and reproduce? There has been little disagreement with the many proposed population benefits of senescence, but evolution theory as described by Darwin and currently taught is very individual-oriented and until recently, programmed aging has been widely thought to be theoretically impossible. However, genetics discoveries have exposed issues with traditional theory that support population-driven evolution and programmed aging. In particular, as described in this article, the discovery that biological inheritance involves the transmission of information in digital form between parent and descendant of any organism strongly supports population-oriented evolution concepts and dependent programmed aging theories. A related issue concerns evolvability. Traditional theory assumes that the ability to evolve (evolvability) and involving mutations and natural selection is an inherent property of life. Evolvability theories suggest that evolvability in complex species is instead mainly itself the result of evolved traits and that such traits can evolve even if individually adverse. Programmed aging theories based on evolvability suggest that aging has evolved because it increases evolvability causing a population benefit. This idea is also strongly supported by the digital nature of inheritance. The programmed vs. non-programmed issue is critical to medical research because the two concepts suggest that very different biological mechanisms are responsible for aging and most instances of age-related disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skulachev, V. (1997) Aging is a specific biological function rather than the result of a disorder in complex living systems: biochemical evidence in support of Weismann’s hypothesis, Biochemistry (Moscow), 62, 1191–1195.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weismann, A. (1882) Uber die Dauer des Lebens, Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldsmith, T. (2014) The Evolution of Aging, 3rd Edn., Azinet Press, Annapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mittledorf, J. (2006) Chaotic population dynamics and the evolution of ageing, Evol. Ecol. Res., 8, 561–574.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Libertini, G. (1988) An adaptive theory of increasing mortality with increasing chronological age in populations in the wild, J. Theor. Biol., 132, 145–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton, W. (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior, Am. Nat., 97, 354–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wynne-Edwards, V. (1962) Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zedalis, J., and Eggebrecht, J. (2018) Biology for AP Courses, OpenStax, Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olshansky, S., Hayflick, L., and Carnes, B. (2002) No truth to the fountain of youth, Sci. Am., 286, 92–95 (reprinted July 2004, Vol 14, No. 3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Watson, J. D., and Crick, F. H. (1953) Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid, Nature, 171, 737–738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Crick, F. H., Barnett, L., Brenner, S., and Watts-Tobin, R. J. (1961) General nature of the genetic code for proteins, Nature, 192, 1227–1232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Proakis, J., and Salehi, M. (2014) Digital Communications, 5th Edn., McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krebs, J., Goldstein, E., and Kilpatrick, S. (2017) Lewin’s GENES XII, 12th Edn., Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salomon, D. (2010) Handbook of Data Compression, 5th Edn., Springer, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Darwin, C. (1859) On the Origin of Species, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldsmith, T. C. (2017) Evolvability, population benefit, and the evolution of programmed aging in mammals, Biochemistry (Moscow), 82, 1423–1429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams, G. (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence, Evolution, 11, 398–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Medawar, P. (1952) An Unsolved Problem of Biology, H.K. Lewis & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldsmith, T. (2013) Arguments against non-programmed aging theories, Biochemistry (Moscow), 78, 971–978, doi: 10.1134/S0006297913090022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirkwood, T. (1977) Evolution of ageing, Nature, 270, 301–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. De Grey, A. D. (2007) Calorie restriction, post-reproductive life span, and programmed aging: a plea for rigor, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1119, 296–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Grey, A. (2015) Do we have genes that exist to hasten aging? New data, new arguments, but the answer is still no, Curr. Aging Sci., 8, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams, G. (1971) Group Selection, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Travis, J. (2004) The evolution of programmed death in a spatially structured population, J. Gerontol., 59, 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldsmith, T. (2017) Externally regulated programmed aging and the effects of population stress on mammal lifespan, Biochemistry (Moscow), 82, 1430–1434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Apfeld, J., and Kenyon, C. (1999) Regulation of lifespan by sensory perception in Caenorhabditis elegans, Nature, 402, 804–809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. C. Goldsmith.

Additional information

Conflict of interest. The author declares no conflict of interest in financial or any other area.

Ethical approval. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author

Published in Russian in Biokhimiya, 2019, Vol. 84, No. 12, pp. 1792–1800.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldsmith, T.C. Digital Genetics, Variation, Evolvability, and the Evolution of Programmed Aging. Biochemistry Moscow 84, 1451–1457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297919120046

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297919120046

Keywords

Navigation