Skip to main content
Log in

Extremality of Gibbs Measures for the \(HC\)-Blume–Capel Model on the Cayley Tree

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Mathematical Notes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider translation-invariant Gibbs measures (TIGMs) for the \(HC\)-Blume–Capel model in case of “wands” with chemical potential with parameters \((\theta,\eta)\) on the Cayley tree. It is proved that, for \(\eta\le\theta^{3}\), there is a unique TIGM and, for \(\eta>\theta^{3}\), there are exactly three TIGMs in the case of “wands” with chemical potential for the model under consideration. In addition, the problem of the (non)extremality of these measures is studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.-O. Georgii, Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin–New York, 1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. C. J. Preston, Gibbs States on Countable Sets (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Ya. G. Sinai, Theory of phase transitions. Strong results (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. J. Preston and U. A. Rozikov, Gibbs Measures on Cayley Trees (World Sci., New Jersey, 2013).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. E. Mazel and Yu. M. Suhov, “Random surfaces with two-sided constraints: an application of the theory of dominant ground states,” J. Statist. Phys. 64 (1-2), 111–134 (1991).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. M. Suhov and U. A. Rozikov, “A hard-core model on a Cayley tree: an example of a loss network,” Queueing Syst. 46 (1-2), 197–212 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. J. B. Martin, “Reconstruction thresholds on regular trees,” in Discrete Random Walks (Assoc. Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci., Nancy, 2003), pp. 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  8. U. A. Rozikov and R. M. Khakimov, “The extremity of translation-invariant Gibbs measure for the \(HC\) models on a Cayley tree,” Bull. Inst. Mat., No. 2, 17–22 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. M. Khakimov, “Uniqueness of weakly periodic Gibbs measure for HC-models,” Math. Notes 94 (5), 834–838 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. R. M. Khakimov, “Weakly periodic Gibbs measures for \(HC\)-models for a normal index divisor 4,” Ukr. Mat. Zh. 67 (10), 1409–1422 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. M. Khakimov, “Weakly periodic Gibbs measures for HC-models on Cayley trees,” Siberian Math. J. 59 (1), 147–156 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Brightwell and P. Winkler, “Graph homomorphisms and phase transitions,” J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 77 (2), 221–262 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. J. B. Martin, U. A. Rozikov and Yu. M. Suhov, “A three state hard-core model on a Cayley tree,” J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 12 (3), 432–448 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. U. A. Rozikov and Sh. A. Shoyusupov, “Fertile HC models with three states on a Cayley tree,” Theoret. and Math. Phys. 156 (3), 1319–1330 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. R. M. Khakimov, “Translation-invariant Gibbs measures for fertile three-state “hard core” models on a Cayley tree,” Theoret. and Math. Phys. 183 (3), 829–835 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. U. A. Rozikov and R. M. Khakimov, “Gibbs measures for the fertile three-state hard core models on a Cayley tree,” Queueing Syst. 81 (1), 49–69 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. E. N. Cirillo and E. Olivieri, “Metastabilty and nucleation for the Blume–Capel model,” J. Statist. Phys. 83 (3-4), 473–554 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. P. E. Theodorakis and N. J. Fytas, “Monte Carlo study of the triangular Blume–Capel model under bond randomness,” Phys. Rev. E 86, 011140 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O. Hryniv and R. Kotecky, “Surface tension and the Orustein–Zernike behavior for the 2D Blume–Capel model,” J. Statist. Phys. 106 (314), 431–476 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. N. M. Xatamov and R. M. Khakimov, “Translation-invariant Gibbs measures for the Blume–Capel model on a Cayley tree,” Zh. Mat. Fiz. Anal. Geom. 15 (2), 239–255 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. N. M. Khatamov, “Extremity of translation-invariant Gibbs measures for the Blume–Capel model in the case of “wands” on the Cayley tree,” Ukr. Mat. Zh. 72 (4), 540–556 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. N. M. Khatamov, “Holliday junctions in the Blume–Capel model of DNA,” Theoret. and Math. Phys. 206 (3), 383–390 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Kesten and B. P. Stigum, “Additional limit theorem for indecomposable multi-dimensional Galton-Watson processes,” Ann. Math. Statist. 37, 1463–1481 (1966).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Martinelli, A. Sinclair and D. Weitz, “Fast mixing for independent sets, coloring and other models on trees,” Random Structures Algoritms 31 (2), 134–172 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Külske and U. A. Rozikov, “Fuzzy transformations and extremality of Gibbs measures for the Potts model on a Cayley tree,” Random Structures Algorithms 50 (4), 636–678 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to express gratitude to Professors U. A. Rozikov and R. M. Khakimov for helpful advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. M. Khatamov.

Additional information

Translated from Matematicheskie Zametki, 2022, Vol. 111, pp. 762–777 https://doi.org/10.4213/mzm13217.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khatamov, N.M. Extremality of Gibbs Measures for the \(HC\)-Blume–Capel Model on the Cayley Tree. Math Notes 111, 768–781 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143462205011X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143462205011X

Keywords

Navigation