Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiscale Simulation of Gas Cleaning Processes

  • Published:
Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations Aims and scope

Abstract—

This paper considers modeling the processes of cleaning air from finely dispersed solid contaminants clustered in the form of nanoparticles. The purification technology chosen for the study involves the use of a system consisting of nanofilters and sorbents. Both cleaning methods used in it are currently in high demand and are often combined in appropriate devices. The first cleaning method using nanofilters ensures a high purification quality. However, this method is expensive as it requires frequent replacement of the filter elements (membranes) and the disposal of these elements. The second method of cleaning with sorbents gives a relatively low quality of cleaning but enables multiply repeated a purification procedure after washing the sorbent with special liquids. The optimization of air cleaning devices using nanofilters and sorbents requires a detailed investigation of the processes occurring in the cleaning system. The proposed study addresses part of the problem associated with the passage of an air flow containing solid contaminant nanoparticles through a layer of granular sorbent. For this purpose, a multiscale mathematical model, a numerical algorithm, and a parallel implementation of the model on a macroscopic scale have been developed. The novelty of the approach consists in the use of a quasigasdynamic model for describing the flow in the absorbing layer and in the proposed multiscale formulation of the problem. The preliminary calculations based on the macromodel showed the efficiency of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. N. Lystsov and N. V. Murzin, Nanotechnology Security Issues (MIFI, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. E. Krichevskii, “The dangers and risks of nanotechnology and the principles of control of nanotechnology and nanomaterials,” Nanotekhnol. Okhrana Zdorov., No. 3, 10–24 (2010).

  3. Yu. N. Morgalev, T. G. Morgaleva, N. S. Khoch, and S. Yu. Morgalev, Safety Basics for Nanomaterials (Tomsk. Gos. Univ., Tomsk, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Ryzhkin, “Prospects of development of social control institution in the field of nanotech industry in Russia,” Kreativ. Ekon. 7 (10), 52–58 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. N. Uzhov and B. I. Myagkov, Industrial Gas Filter Cleaning (Khimiya, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. G. Pivovarov, N. G. Bugai, and V. A. Rychko, Drainage with Fiber Filters (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1980) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. G. Mazus, M. L. Malgin, and M. L. Morgulis, Industrial Emission Filters (Mashinostroenie, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. A. Shtokman, Purification of Air from Dust at the Enterprises of the Food Industry (Agropromizdat, Moscow, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. B. Stark, Gas Purifiers and Plants in the Metallurgical Industry (Metallurgiia, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. A. Shtokman, Air Cleaning (ASV, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. F. Gladyshev, T. V. Gladysheva, and S. I. Dvoretskii, Systems and Means of Regeneration and Purification of Air of Inhabited Pressurized Objects (Spektr, Moscow, 2016) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. S. Soldatov, A. A. Shunkevich, and V. V. Martsinkevich, “Comparative study of water softening with granular and fibrous ion exchangers,” Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 74, 1521–1524 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. A. Zakharchenko, O. B. Mokhodoeva, and G. V. Myasoedova, “The use of fibrous 'filled' sorbents for the dynamic concentration of precious metals,” Sorbtsion. Khromatogr. Protses. 5, 679–689 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. V. Komarova, N. K. Galkina, and K. I. Sheptovetskaia, “Studies of a fibrous sorbent filled with KU-2 cation exchanger using mathematical models of the process of water softening,” Sorbtsion. Khromatogr. Protses. 10, 371–377 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. V. Kolotilov, A. V. Shvets, I. V. Vasilenko, N. V. Kasyan, and V. V. Pavlishchuk, “Porous magnetic sorbents based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the selective extraction of optically active molecules,” Nanosist., Nanomater., Nanotekhnol. 6, 1261–1271 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. A. Sukhareva, A. G. Ganieva, V. Yu. Guskov, and F. Kh. Kudasheva, “Sorption properties of a porous polymer modified with platinum nanoparticles,” Sorbtsion. Khromatogr. Protses. 14 (1), 175–180 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. R. Egunova, T. A. Konstantinova, and S. N. Shtykov, “Magnetic magnetite nanoparticles in separation and concentration,” Izv. Sarat. Univ., Nov. Ser., Khim. Biol. Ekol. 14 (4), 27–35 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. V. Tolmacheva, V. V. Apyari, E. V. Kochuk, and S. G. Dmitrienko, “Magnetic adsorbents based on iron oxide nanoparticles for the extraction and preconcentration of organic compounds,” J. Anal. Chem. 71, 321–338 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu. N. Karamzin, T. A. Kudryashova, V. O. Podryga, and S. V. Polyakov, “Multiscale simulation of nonlinear processes in technical microsystems,” Mat. Model. 27 (7), 65–74 (2015).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Kudryashova, Yu. Karamzin, V. Podryga, and S. Polyakov, “Two-scale computation of N2-H2 jet flow based on QGD and MMD on heterogeneous multi-core hardware,” Adv. Eng. Software 120, 79–87 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. V. O. Podryga, Yu. N. Karamzin, T. A. Kudryashova, and S. V. Polyakov, “Multiscale simulation of three-dimensional unsteady gas flows in microchannels of technical systems,” in Proceedings of the 7th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS 2016), June2016, Vol. 2, pp. 2331–2345.

  22. V. O. Podryga, “Multiscale approach to computation of three-dimensional gas mixture flows in engineering microchannels,” Dokl. Math. 94, 458–460 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. V. O. Podryga and S. V. Polyakov, “Parallel implementation of multiscale approach to the numerical study of gas microflows,” Vychisl. Metody Programmir. 17, 147–165 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. O. Podryga and S. V. Polyakov, “Multiscale simulation of a gas jet in a vacuum,” KIAM Preprint No. 81 (Keldysh Inst. Appl. Math., Moscow, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Kudryashova, V. Podryga, and S. Polyakov, “HPC-simulation of gasdynamic flows on macroscopic and molecular levels,” in Nonlinearity.Problems, Solutions and Applications (Nova Science, New York, 2017), Vol. 1, Chap. 26, pp. 543–556.

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. I. Kheifets and A. V. Neimark, Multiphase Processes in Porous Media (Khimiya, Moscow, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. V. Churaev, Physical Chemistry of Mass Transfer Processes in Porous Bodies (Khimiia, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. V. Moskalev and V. V. Shitov, Mathematical Modeling of Porous Systems (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. E. Scheidegger, The Physics of Flow through Porous Media (Macmillan and Co., New York, 1960).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. S. A. Reitlinger, Permeability of Polymeric Materials (Khimiya, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Ya. Malkin and A. E. Chalykh, Diffusion and Viscosity of Polymers: Measurement Methods (Khimiya, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. E. Chalykh, Diffusion in Polymer Systems (Khimiya, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. I. I. Vorovich and V. M. Aleksandrov, Contact Mechanics (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  34. N. K. Myshkin and M. I. Petrokovets, Friction, Lubrication, Wear. Physical Foundations and Technical Applications of Tribology (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  35. V. G. Zavodinskii, Computer Simulation of Nanoparticles and Nanosystems (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood, Computer Simulation Using Particles (IOP, Adam Hilger, Bristol, NY, 1988).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1989).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. J. M. Haile, Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Elementary Methods (Wiley, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications (Academic, San Diego, 2002).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. D. C. Rapaport, The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. J. E. Lennard-Jones, “Cohesion,” Proc. Phys. Soc. 43, 461–482 (1931).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. L. Verlet, “Computer 'experiments' on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules,” Phys. Rev. 159, 98–103 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. N. Metropolis and S. Ulam, “The Monte Carlo method,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 44 (247), 335–341 (1949).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. I. M. Sobol, The Monte Carlo Method (Nauka, Moscow, 1968; Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, 1974).

  45. G. S. Fishman, Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. O. M. Belotserkovskii and Yu. I. Khlopkov, Monte-Carlo Methods in Mechanics of Fluids and Gas (Azbuka, Moscow, 2008; World Scientific, Singapore etc., 2010).

  47. B. N. Chetverushkin, Kinetic Schemes and Quasi-Gasdynamic System of Equations (CIMNE, Barcelona, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  48. T. G. Elizarova, Quasi-Gas Dynamic Equations (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2009).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Yu. V. Sheretov, Continuous Media Dynamics with Spatio-Temporal Averaging (RKhD, Moscow, Izhevsk, 2009) [in Russian].

  50. T. G. Elizarova, A. A. Zlotnik, and B. N. Chetverushkin, “On quasi-gasdynamic and quasi-hydrodynamic equations for binary gas mixtures,” Dokl. Math. 90, 719–723 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. A. A. Zlotnik and V. A. Gavrilin, “On the discretization of a one-dimensional quasi-hydrodynamic system of equations for a real gas,” Vestn. Mosk. Energ. Inst., No. 1, 5–14 (2016).

  52. A. A. Zlotnik, “Entropy-conservative spatial discretization of the multidimensional quasi-gasdynamic system of equations,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 57, 706–725 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. V. O. Podryga and S. V. Polyakov, “Molecular dynamic simulation of thermodynamic equilibrium problem for heated nickel,” KIAM Preprint No. 41 (Keldysh Inst. Appl. Math., Moscow, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. V. O. Podryga, S. V. Polyakov, and D. V. Puzyrkov, “Supercomputer molecular modeling of thermodynamic equilibrium in gas-metal microsystems,” Vychisl. Metody Programm. 16, 123–138 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. V. O. Podryga and S. V. Polyakov, “Molecular-dynamic calculation of macroparameters of gas in the flow and at the boundary,” KIAM Preprint No. 80 (Keldysh Inst. Appl. Math., Moscow, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  56. G. I. Marchuk, Splitting Methods (Nauka, Moscow, 1988) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  57. R. Eymard, T. R. Gallouet, and R. Herbin, “The finite volume method,” in Handbook of Numerical Analysis (North Holland, Amsterdam, 2000), Vol. 7, pp. 713–1020.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. R. Li, Zh. Chen, and W. Wu, Generalized Difference Methods for Differential Equations. Numerical Analysis of Finite Volume Methods (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Yu. N. Grigoriev, V. A. Vshivkov, and M. P. Fedoruk, Numerical 'Particle-In-Cell’ Methods: Theory and Applications (SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 2004; Utrecht, Boston: VSP, 2002).

  60. I. V. Popov and S. V. Polyakov, “Construction of adaptive irregular triangular grids for 2D multiply connected nonconvex domains,” Mat. Model. 14 (6), 25–35 (2002).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Computational Fluid Dynamics in ANSYS CFX. https://www.cadfem-cis.ru/products/ansys/fluids/cfx/.

  62. W. Gautschi, Numerical Analysis (Springer, Birkhauser, New York, 2012).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. I. V. Popov and I. V. Fryazinov, Adaptive Artificial Viscosity Method for Numerical Solution of Gas Dynamics Equations (KRASAND, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  64. Yu. N. Karamzin and S. V. Polyakov, “Exponential finite-volume schemes for solving elliptic and parabolic equations of general form on irregular grids,” in Proceedings of the 8th All-Russia Conference on Mesh Methods for Boundary Value Problems and Applications (Kazan. Gos. Univ., Kazan, 2010), pp. 234–248.

  65. A. A. Samarskii, Introduction to the Theory of Difference Schemes (Nauka, Moscow, 1971) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  66. A. A. Samarskii and E. S. Nikolaev, Methods for Solving Grid Equations (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  67. S. V. Polyakov, T. A. Kudryashova, A. A. Sverdlin, E. M. Kononov, and O. A. Kosolapov, “Parallel software package for simulation of continuum mechanics problems on modern multiprocessor systems,” Math. Models Comput. Simul. 3, 46–57 (2011).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Yu. Karamzin, T. Kudryashova, V. Podryga, and S. Polyakov, “Numerical simulation of the gas mixture flows using hybrid computer systems,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology (ECT 2014) (Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, 2014), Paper 28.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 125047, Moscow, Russia

    S. V. Polyakov, Yu. N. Karamzin, T. A. Kudryashova, V. O. Podryga, D. V. Puzyrkov & N. I. Tarasov

  2. Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University, 125319, Moscow, Russia

    V. O. Podryga

Authors
  1. S. V. Polyakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu. N. Karamzin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. A. Kudryashova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. O. Podryga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. V. Puzyrkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. N. I. Tarasov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Polyakov.

Ethics declarations

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project nos. 18-51-18004-Bolg_a, 18-07-01292_a, and 18-07-00841_a.

Additional information

Translated by I. Pertsovskaya

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polyakov, S.V., Karamzin, Y.N., Kudryashova, T.A. et al. Multiscale Simulation of Gas Cleaning Processes. Math Models Comput Simul 12, 302–315 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048220030151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048220030151

Keywords:

Search

Navigation