Skip to main content
Log in

Microwave Assisted Synthesis and Oxidation Resistance of Sm3+ Doped Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

  • Nanostructures, Including Nanotubes
  • Published:
Nanotechnologies in Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, pure and Sm3+ doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles were prepared via a microwave assisted synthesis in water solution. The samples were characterized by TEM, XRD, XANES, and VSM techniques. The structure and morphology, Fe and Sm oxidation states, the oxidation resistance and magnetic properties of pure and Sm doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles were studied. TEM and XRD results show that Sm doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles have a good dispersion and are smaller than pure Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The Fe and Sm oxidation states of pure and Sm doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles were studied by means of XANES analysis. The magnetic properties of Sm doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles determined by VSM exhibit superparamagnetic behavior with high saturation magnetization. It was found that Sm doping in a small amount makes it possible not only to reduce the sizes of magnetite nanoparticles but also to improve their oxidation resistance and increase their saturation magnetization value. These pure and Sm doped Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles are expected to be used in a number of biomedical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. H. Reddy, J. L. Arias, J. Nicolas, and P. Couvreur, “Magnetic nanoparticles: design and characterization, toxicity and biocompatibility, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications,” Chem. Rev. 112, 5818–5878 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. K. Gupta and M. Gupta, “Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” Biomaterials 26, 3995–4021 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Laurent, D. Forge, M. Port, A. Roch, C. Robic, L. Elst, and R. Muller, “Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications,” Chem. Rev. 108, 2064–2110 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Ling, N. Lee, and T. Hyeon, “Chemical synthesis and assembly of uniformly sized iron oxide nanoparticles for medical applications,” Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1276–1285 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Xu and S. Sun, “New forms of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 732–743 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Liu, J. Gao, H. Ai, and X. Chen, “Applications and potential toxicity of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles,” Small 9, 1533–1545 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Markides, M. Rotherham, and A. J. El Haj, “Biocompatibility and toxicity of magnetic nanoparticles in regenerative medicine,” J. Nanomater. 2012, 614094 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Alexis, E. M. Pridgen, R. Langer, and O. C. Farokhzad, Nanoparticle technologies for cancer therapy, in Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Nie, Y. Xing, G. J. Kim, and J. W. Simons, “Nanotechnology applications in cancer,” Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 257–288 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Klostergaard and C. E. Seeney, “Magnetic nanovectors for drug delivery,” Nanomed.: Nanotechnol., Biol., Med. 8, S37–S50 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Yoo, J. H. Lee, T. H. Shin, and J. Cheon, “Theranostic magnetic nanoparticles,” Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 863–874 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Chouly, D. Pouliquen, I. Lucet, J. J. Jeune, and P. Jallet, “Development of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for MRI: effect of particle size, charge, and surface nature on biodistribution,” J. Microencapsulat. 13, 245–255 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Li, “A targeted approach to cancer imaging and therapy,” Nat. Mater. 13, 110–115 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Xie, G. Liu, H. S. Eden, H. Ai, and X. Chen, “Surface- engineered magnetic nanoparticle platforms for cancer imaging and therapy,” Acc. Chem. Res 44, 883–892 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Huan, C. Cheng, Y. Yang, H. Yuan, and Y. Li, “A study on the magnetic and photoluminescence properties of Eu(n+) and Sm3+ doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles,” J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 12, 4621–4634 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Liu and N. Zhang, “Gadolinium loaded nanoparticles in theranostic magnetic resonance imaging,” Biomaterials 33, 5363–5375 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Wu, Q. He, and C. Jiang, “Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies,” Nanoscale Res. Lett. 3, 397–415 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Wang, J. Zhuang, Q. Peng, and Y. Li, “A general strategy for nanocrystal synthesis,” Nature (London, U.K.) 437, 121–124 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Zhang, F. Shen, and R. Hong, “Solvothermal synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4 microparticles via self-assembly of Fe3O4 nanoparticles,” Particuology 9, 179–186 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Iwasaki, R. Nakatsuka, K. Murase, H. Takata, H. Nakamura, and S. Watano, “Simple and rapid synthesis of magnetite/hydroxyapatite composites for hyperthermia treatments via a mechanochemical route,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 9365–9378 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. B. Chin and I. I. Yaacob, “Synthesis and characterization of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles via w/o microemulsion and Massart’s procedure,” J. Mater. Process. Technol. 191, 235–237 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Sun and H. Zeng, “Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 8204–5 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Ramimoghadam, S. Bagheri, and S. B. A. Hamid, “Progress in electrochemical synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 368, 207–229 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Li, Y. Wei, A. Liivat, Y. Zhu, and J. Zhu, “Microwave- solvothermal synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles,” Mater. Lett. 107 23–26 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. B. Ravel and M. Newville, “ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT,” J. Synchrotr. Rad. 12, 537–541 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. E. Polozhentsev.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Polozhentsev, O.E., Butova, V.V., Kochkina, V.K. et al. Microwave Assisted Synthesis and Oxidation Resistance of Sm3+ Doped Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Nanotechnol Russia 13, 109–115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078018020088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078018020088

Navigation