Skip to main content
Log in

Stress state of the Earth’s crust of the Kuril Islands and Kamchatka before the Simushir earthquake

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Pacific Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The field of modern tectonic stresses was reconstructed for the Earth’s crust of the northwestern segment of the Pacific subduction zones. For this purpose, we used the method of cataclastic analysis and data on the magnitude of the stresses released at the source of the Simushir earthquake of 2006, which allowed us to determine both the orientation of the principal stress axes and the magnitude of the stresses and to estimate the effective strength of rock masses. The effective cohesion was estimated for this region of the Earth’s crust as 12 bar, and the maximum shear stresses are no higher than 300 bar. The analysis of the reconstructed stress field in the zone of the preparation of the Simushir earthquake showed that this region was almost free of domains with high stresses where brittle failure requires considerable energy inputs. The medium level of effective pressure indicates that this region is most favorable for the development of a large-scale brittle failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. V. Gzovskii, Principles of Tectonophysics (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. V. Gol’din, “Dilatancy, Repacking, and Earthquakes,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 10, 37–54 (2004).

  3. O. I. Gushchenko, “Seismotectonic Stress Monitoring of the Lithosphere: The Structural Kinematic Principle and Basic Features of the Algorithm,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 346(3), 399–402 (1996) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 346, 144–147 (1996)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. A. Dobrynina, “Rates and Direction of Faults in Sources of the 1999 South Baikal Earthquake Successions,” in Proceedings of the 9th Uralian Youth Scientific School on Geophysics. Modern Problems of Geophysics, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2008 (Izd. Inst. Geol. Fiz. Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Yekaterinburg, 2008), pp. 55–57 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. V. Kostrov, Mechanics of Tectonic Earthquake Source (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Reconstruction of Tectonic Stress and Seismotectonic Strains: Methodical Fundamentals, Current Stresses Field of Southeastern Asia and Oceania,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 354(1), 101–104 (1997) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 354 (4), 560–563 (1997)].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Methods for Reconstructing of Tectonic Stresses and Seismotectonic Deformations Based on the Modern Theory of Plasticity,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 365(3), 392–395 (1999) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 365A (3), 370–373 (1999)].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Principles of Stress Monitoring and Method of Cataclastic Analyses of Shear Totalities,” Byul. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Ser. Geol. 76(4), 28–35 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Development of the Method of Cataclastic Analysis of Shear Fractures for Tectonic Stresses Estimation,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 388(2), 237–241 (2003) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 388 (1), 72–76 (2003)].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Estimation of Relative Stress Values: Second Stage of Reconstruction from Data on Fault Displacements,” Geofiz. Zh. Kiev 27(1), 39–54 (2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu. L. Rebetsky and A. V. Marinin, “Field of Tectonic Stresses before the December 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake. Model of Metastable State of Rocks,” Geol. Geofiz. 47(11), 1192–1206 [in Russian].

  12. Yu. L. Rebetsky and A. V. Marinin, “Stressed State of the Earth’s Crust in the Western Region of the Sunda Subduction Zone before the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake on December 26, 2004,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 407(1), 106–109 (2006–2) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 407 (2), 321–325 (2006–2)].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu. L. Rebetsky, O. A. Kuchai, and A. V. Marinin, “Stressed State of the Earth’s Crust in Altai and Sayan before 2003 Chuya Earthquakes,” in Proceedings of All-Russian Conference with International Participation on Problems of Modern Seismology and Geodynamics of Central Asia, Irkutsk, Russia, 2007 (Izd. Inst. Zem. Kory Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Irkutsk, 2007), pp. 106–111 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu. L. Rebetsky, “New Data on Natural Stresses in Area of Preparation of Strong Earthquakes. Model of Earthquake Focal Zones,” Geofiz. Zh. 29(6), 92–110 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu. L. Rebetsky, Tectonic Stresses and Strength of Mountain Massifs (Nauka, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Tertsagi, Theory of Soil Mechanics (Gosstroiizdat, Moscow, 1961) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. A. Fedotov, “Seismic Cycles, Possibility of Quantitative Zoning and Long-Term Seismic Forecast,” in Seismic Zoning of the USSR (Nauka, Moscow, 1968), pp. 121–130 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. L. Yunga, Methods and Results of Studying Seismotectonic Deformations (Nauka, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Angelier, “From Orientation to Magnitude in Paleostress Determinations Using Fault Slip Data,” J. Struct. Geol. 11(1/2), 37–49 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. D. Byerlee, “Friction of Rocks,” Pure Appl. Geophys. 116, 615–626 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Carey-Gailhardis and J. L. Mercier, “A Numerical Method for Determining the State of Stress Using Focal Mechanisms of Earthquake Populations: Application to Tibetan Teleseismic and Microseismicity of Southern Peru,” Earth Planet. Sci. Let. 82, 165–179 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. W. Gephart and D. W. Forsyth, “An Improved Method for Determining the Regional Stress Tensor Using Earthquake Focal Mechanism Data: Application to the San Fernando Earthquake Sequence,” J. Geophys. Res. 89(B11), 9305–9320 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/eqachives/poster/ 2006/20061115_image.php.

  24. http://www.globalcmt.org.

  25. Yu. L. Rebetsky, “I. Stress-Monitoring: Issues of Reconstruction Methods of Tectonic Stresses and Seismotectonic Deformations,” J. Earthq. Pred. Res. Beijing, China 5(4), 557–573 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yu. L. Rebetsky, A. V. Mikhailova, G. V. Rosanova, and E. V. Fursova, “II. Stress-Monitoring: The Modern Field of Regional Stresses in South East Asia and Oceania. Principles of Quasiplastic Deforming of Fractured Media,” J. Earthq. Pred. Res. Beijing, China 6(1), 11–36 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. H. Sibson, “Frictional Constraints on Thrust, Wrench and Normal Faults,” Nature 249(5457), 542–544 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Yu.L. Rebetsky, 2009, published in Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya, 2009, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 70–84.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rebetsky, Y.L. Stress state of the Earth’s crust of the Kuril Islands and Kamchatka before the Simushir earthquake. Russ. J. of Pac. Geol. 3, 477–490 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714009050108

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714009050108

Key words

Navigation