Abstract
The field of modern tectonic stresses was reconstructed for the Earth’s crust of the northwestern segment of the Pacific subduction zones. For this purpose, we used the method of cataclastic analysis and data on the magnitude of the stresses released at the source of the Simushir earthquake of 2006, which allowed us to determine both the orientation of the principal stress axes and the magnitude of the stresses and to estimate the effective strength of rock masses. The effective cohesion was estimated for this region of the Earth’s crust as 12 bar, and the maximum shear stresses are no higher than 300 bar. The analysis of the reconstructed stress field in the zone of the preparation of the Simushir earthquake showed that this region was almost free of domains with high stresses where brittle failure requires considerable energy inputs. The medium level of effective pressure indicates that this region is most favorable for the development of a large-scale brittle failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. V. Gzovskii, Principles of Tectonophysics (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].
S. V. Gol’din, “Dilatancy, Repacking, and Earthquakes,” Fiz. Zemli, No. 10, 37–54 (2004).
O. I. Gushchenko, “Seismotectonic Stress Monitoring of the Lithosphere: The Structural Kinematic Principle and Basic Features of the Algorithm,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 346(3), 399–402 (1996) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 346, 144–147 (1996)].
A. A. Dobrynina, “Rates and Direction of Faults in Sources of the 1999 South Baikal Earthquake Successions,” in Proceedings of the 9th Uralian Youth Scientific School on Geophysics. Modern Problems of Geophysics, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 2008 (Izd. Inst. Geol. Fiz. Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Yekaterinburg, 2008), pp. 55–57 [in Russian].
B. V. Kostrov, Mechanics of Tectonic Earthquake Source (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].
Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Reconstruction of Tectonic Stress and Seismotectonic Strains: Methodical Fundamentals, Current Stresses Field of Southeastern Asia and Oceania,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 354(1), 101–104 (1997) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 354 (4), 560–563 (1997)].
Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Methods for Reconstructing of Tectonic Stresses and Seismotectonic Deformations Based on the Modern Theory of Plasticity,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 365(3), 392–395 (1999) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 365A (3), 370–373 (1999)].
Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Principles of Stress Monitoring and Method of Cataclastic Analyses of Shear Totalities,” Byul. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Ser. Geol. 76(4), 28–35 (2001).
Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Development of the Method of Cataclastic Analysis of Shear Fractures for Tectonic Stresses Estimation,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 388(2), 237–241 (2003) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 388 (1), 72–76 (2003)].
Yu. L. Rebetsky, “Estimation of Relative Stress Values: Second Stage of Reconstruction from Data on Fault Displacements,” Geofiz. Zh. Kiev 27(1), 39–54 (2005) [in Russian].
Yu. L. Rebetsky and A. V. Marinin, “Field of Tectonic Stresses before the December 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake. Model of Metastable State of Rocks,” Geol. Geofiz. 47(11), 1192–1206 [in Russian].
Yu. L. Rebetsky and A. V. Marinin, “Stressed State of the Earth’s Crust in the Western Region of the Sunda Subduction Zone before the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake on December 26, 2004,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 407(1), 106–109 (2006–2) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 407 (2), 321–325 (2006–2)].
Yu. L. Rebetsky, O. A. Kuchai, and A. V. Marinin, “Stressed State of the Earth’s Crust in Altai and Sayan before 2003 Chuya Earthquakes,” in Proceedings of All-Russian Conference with International Participation on Problems of Modern Seismology and Geodynamics of Central Asia, Irkutsk, Russia, 2007 (Izd. Inst. Zem. Kory Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Irkutsk, 2007), pp. 106–111 [in Russian].
Yu. L. Rebetsky, “New Data on Natural Stresses in Area of Preparation of Strong Earthquakes. Model of Earthquake Focal Zones,” Geofiz. Zh. 29(6), 92–110 (2007).
Yu. L. Rebetsky, Tectonic Stresses and Strength of Mountain Massifs (Nauka, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].
K. Tertsagi, Theory of Soil Mechanics (Gosstroiizdat, Moscow, 1961) [in Russian].
S. A. Fedotov, “Seismic Cycles, Possibility of Quantitative Zoning and Long-Term Seismic Forecast,” in Seismic Zoning of the USSR (Nauka, Moscow, 1968), pp. 121–130 [in Russian].
S. L. Yunga, Methods and Results of Studying Seismotectonic Deformations (Nauka, Moscow, 1990) [in Russian].
J. Angelier, “From Orientation to Magnitude in Paleostress Determinations Using Fault Slip Data,” J. Struct. Geol. 11(1/2), 37–49 (1989).
J. D. Byerlee, “Friction of Rocks,” Pure Appl. Geophys. 116, 615–626 (1978).
E. Carey-Gailhardis and J. L. Mercier, “A Numerical Method for Determining the State of Stress Using Focal Mechanisms of Earthquake Populations: Application to Tibetan Teleseismic and Microseismicity of Southern Peru,” Earth Planet. Sci. Let. 82, 165–179 (1987).
J. W. Gephart and D. W. Forsyth, “An Improved Method for Determining the Regional Stress Tensor Using Earthquake Focal Mechanism Data: Application to the San Fernando Earthquake Sequence,” J. Geophys. Res. 89(B11), 9305–9320 (1984).
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/eqachives/poster/ 2006/20061115_image.php.
Yu. L. Rebetsky, “I. Stress-Monitoring: Issues of Reconstruction Methods of Tectonic Stresses and Seismotectonic Deformations,” J. Earthq. Pred. Res. Beijing, China 5(4), 557–573 (1996).
Yu. L. Rebetsky, A. V. Mikhailova, G. V. Rosanova, and E. V. Fursova, “II. Stress-Monitoring: The Modern Field of Regional Stresses in South East Asia and Oceania. Principles of Quasiplastic Deforming of Fractured Media,” J. Earthq. Pred. Res. Beijing, China 6(1), 11–36 (1997).
R. H. Sibson, “Frictional Constraints on Thrust, Wrench and Normal Faults,” Nature 249(5457), 542–544 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Yu.L. Rebetsky, 2009, published in Tikhookeanskaya Geologiya, 2009, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 70–84.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rebetsky, Y.L. Stress state of the Earth’s crust of the Kuril Islands and Kamchatka before the Simushir earthquake. Russ. J. of Pac. Geol. 3, 477–490 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714009050108
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714009050108