Skip to main content
Log in

Validation and Correction for 208Tl Activity to Assay 232Th in Equilibrium with Its Daughters

  • METHODS OF PHYSICAL EXPERIMENT
  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The natural radioactivity measurements and analysis of 232Th have been studied using γ-ray spectroscopy depending on its decay daughters in equilibrium; 208Tl of 583.19 keV, 228Ac of (911.2 and 968.97 keV) and 212Pb of 238.63 keV. When using these gamma transitions to calculate the 232Th specific activity, the 208Tl daughter of 583.19 keV gamma line with its 0.845 branching ratio gives activity of approximately 33.94% less than the other gamma transitions. This article is trying to explain and validate this difference and discrepancy that may encounter analysts during calculation of 232Th activity based on 208Tl (583.19 keV) gamma line. Very efficient HpGe detector was used to carry out this work. The MDA and figure of merit as functions of HpGe and energy sensitivity were calculated and tabulated. This issue was verified and validated using Black sand and natural environmental samples. A correction factor was proposed and applied on the 583 keV line of these samples that contain 232Th in equilibrium with its daughters to minimize and eliminate the abovementioned difference in the calculated 232Th specific activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. Mehra, R. G. Sonkawade, S. Kansal, and S. Singh, “Analysis of terrestrial natural radionuclides in soil samples and assessment of average effective dose,” Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 48, 805–808 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Ward Whicker, M. Eisenbud, and Th. Gesell, “Environmental radioactivity from natural, industrial, and military sources,” Rad. Res. 148, 402–403 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O. Abo Bakr, M. Abdel-Rahman, and S. A. El-Mongy, “Analysis of naturally occurring radioactive materials in environmental samples using gamma spectrometry,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Chemical and Environmental Engineering (ICEE9), 3–5 April,2018, MTC.

  4. N. Naskar, S. Lahiri, P. Chaudhuri, and A. Srivastava, “Measurement of naturally occurring radioactive materials, 238U and 232Th. Part 3: Is efficiency calibration necessary for quantitative measurement of ultra-low level NORM?,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 314, 507–511 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. M. Azmary, J. Ferdous, and M. M. Haque, “Natural radioactivity measurement and assessment of radiological hazards in some building materials used in Bangladesh,” Sci. Res. 09, 1034–1048 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Yasmin, B. S. Barua, M. Uddin Khandaker, M. Kamal, M. Abdur Rashid, S. F. Abdul Sani, H. Ahmed, B. Nikouravan, and D. A. Bradley, “The presence of radioactive materials in soil, sand and sediment samples of Potenga sea beach area, Chittagong, Bangladesh: Geological characteristics and environmental implication,” Results Phys. 8, 1268–1274 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. CANBERRA Germanium Detectors, in GC5019 (Canberra, U.S.A., 2003), p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. M. El-Arabi, “226Ra, 232Th and 40K concentrations in igneous rocks from eastern desert, Egypt and its radiological implications,” Radiat. Meas. 42, 94–100 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. A. E. Abdel-Rahman, H. Abu Shady, and S. A. El-Mongy, “Analysis of ores and its purified constituents by γ-spectrometry with calculation of uranium isotopic atom, mass, and activity ratios,” Zeitschr. Anorg. Allgem. Chem. 644, 477–482 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. W. Yii, “Determination performance of gamma spectrometry co-axial HPGE detector in radiochemistry and environment group,” Nucl. Malaysia (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. IAE Agency, Preparation and Certification of IAEA Gamma Spectrometry Reference Materials, RGU-1, RGTh-1 and RGK-1 (Int. Atomic Energy Agency, 1987).

  12. M. Oddone, L. Giordani, F. Giacobbo, M. Mariani, and S. Morandi, “Practical considerations regarding high resolution gamma-spectrometry measurements of naturally occurring radioactive samples,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 277, 579–585 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. A. E. Abdel-Rahman and S. A. El-Mongy, “Analysis of radioactivity levels and hazard assessment of black sand samples from Rashid area,” Egypt. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 49, 1752–1757 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. I. Vukašinović, D. Todorović, Lj. Životić, L. Kaluđerović, and A. Đorđević, “An analysis of naturally occurring radionuclides and 137Cs in the soils of urban areas using gamma-ray spectrometry,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 1049–1060 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Gören, Ş. Turhan, A. Kurnaz, A. M. K. Garad, C. Duran, F. Uğur, and Z. Yegingil, Environmental evaluation of natural radioactivity in soil near a lignite-burning power plant in Turkey," Appl. Radiat. Isot. 129, 13 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Dlugosz-Lisiecka, “Comparison of two spectrometric counting modes for fast analysis of selected radionuclides activity,” J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 309, 941–945 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Monty, “UNSCEAR Report 2000: United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation, sources and effects of ionizing radiation,” J. Radiol. Protect. 21, 83 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. R. Khattab, H. Tuovinen, J. Lehto, I. E. El Assay, M. G. El Feky, and M. A. Abd El-Rahman, “Determination of uranium in Egyptian graniteic ore by gamma, alpha, and mass spectrometry,” Instrum. Sci. Technol. 45, 338–348 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. F. Hassan, M. A. M. Mahmoud, and M. A. E. Abd El-Rahman, “Effect of radioactive minerals potentiality and primordial nuclei distribution on radiation exposure levels within muscovite granite, Wadi Nugrus, Southeastern Desert, Egypt,” J. Geosci. Environ. Protect. 4 (3), 62–78 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Malain, P. H. Regan, D. A. Bradley, M. Matthews, T. Santawamaitre, and H. A. Al-Sulaiti, “Measurements of NORM in beach sand samples along the Andaman coast of Thailand after the 2004 tsunami,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 619, 441–445 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Monier, S. A. E. Abdelhameid, and H. K. Fouad, “Developed method for thorium analysis in Egyptian black sand monazite fraction,” Arab. J. Nucl. Sci. Appl. 39 (2006).

  22. R. B. Oberer, L. G. Chiang, M. J. Norris, C. A. Gunn, and B. C. Adaline, The Use of TI-208 Gamma Rays for Safeguards, Nondestructive-Assay (NDA) Measurements, Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant (Y-12) (Oak Ridge, TN, 2009), p. Medium: ED.

  23. M. Pope, Identification of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material in Sand, NSF/REU Program (Phys. Dep., Univ. Notre Dame, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. R. Gilmore, Practical Gamma-ray Spectroscopy, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Chichester, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. W. F. Mueller, G. Ilie, H. Lange, M. Rotty, and W. R. Russ, “In-situ measurements and analysis of naturally occurring radioactive materials,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation, Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA),2013.

  26. A. L. Nichols, 208Tl-Comments on Evaluation of Decay Data (Univ. of Surrey, 2010), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar Abo-Bakr Omar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omar Abo-Bakr Omar, Abdel-Rahman, M.A. & El-Mongy, S.A. Validation and Correction for 208Tl Activity to Assay 232Th in Equilibrium with Its Daughters. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 16, 835–841 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477119060505

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477119060505

Keywords:

Navigation