Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prevention of strong earthquakes: Goal or utopia?

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper, we consider ideas suggesting various kinds of industrial impact on the close-to-failure block of the Earth’s crust in order to break a pending strong earthquake (PSE) into a number of smaller quakes or aseismic slips. Among the published proposals on the prevention of a forthcoming strong earthquake, methods based on water injection and vibro influence merit greater attention as they are based on field observations and the results of laboratory tests. In spite of this, the cited proofs are, for various reasons, insufficient to acknowledge the proposed techniques as highly substantiated; in addition, the physical essence of these methods has still not been fully understood. First, the key concept of the methods, namely, the release of the accumulated stresses (or excessive elastic energy) in the source region of a forthcoming strong earthquake, is open to objection. If we treat an earthquake as a phenomenon of a loss in stability, then, the heterogeneities of the physicomechanical properties and stresses along the existing fault or its future trajectory, rather than the absolute values of stresses, play the most important role. In the present paper, this statement is illustrated by the classical examples of stable and unstable fractures and by the examples of the calculated stress fields, which were realized in the source regions of the tsunamigenic earthquakes of December 26, 2004 near the Sumatra Island and of September 29, 2009 near the Samoa Island. Here, just before the earthquakes, there were no excessive stresses in the source regions. Quite the opposite, the maximum shear stresses τmax were close to their minimum value, compared to τmax in the adjacent territory. In the present paper, we provide quantitative examples that falsify the theory of the prevention of PSE in its current form. It is shown that the measures for the prevention of PSE, even when successful for an already existing fault, can trigger or accelerate a catastrophic earthquake because of dynamic fault propagation in the intact region. Some additional aspects of prevention of PSE are discussed. We conclude that in the near future, it is too early to consider the problem of prevention of a forthcoming strong earthquake as a practical task; otherwise, the results can prove to be very different from the desired ones. Nevertheless, it makes sense to continue studying this problem. The theoretical research and experimental investigation of the structure and properties of the regions where the prevention of a forthcoming strong earthquake is planned in the future are of primary importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adushkin, V.V., Spivak, A.A., and Dubinya, M.G., Seismic Phenomena Induced by the Underground Nuclear Explosion, in Induced Seismicity, Moscow: Nedra, 1994, pp. 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammon, C.J., Ji, C., Thio, N.-K., et al., Rupture Process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake, Science, 2005, vol. 308, pp. 1133–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astarita, G. and Marrucci, G., Principles of Non-Newtonian Fluid Dynamics, London: McGraw-Hill, 1974; Moscow: Mir, 1978, pp. 1–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, P., How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organised Criticality N.-Y.: Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 1–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, P. and Tang, C., Earthquakes as a Self-Organized Critical Phenomenon, J. Geophys. Res., 1989, vol. 94(B), pp. 15.635–15.637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, V.V. and Nikolaev, A.S., The Method of Control of the Stress State of Seismic Region, RF Patent No. RU 2150721 CI; G01V9/00, Russia (23 September 1998).

  • Ben-Zion, Y., Dynamic Ruptures in Recent Models of Earthquake Faults, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 2001, vol. 49, pp. 2209–2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivin, Yu.K., Simonov, I.V., Fedotov, S.A., and Khavroshkin, O.B., The Method of Relieving of the Mechanical Stresses in the Geological Medium, RF Patent No. RU 2050014; G01V9/00, Russia (23 July 1992).

  • Brune, J.N., Brown, S., and Johnson, P.A., Rupture Mechanism and Interface Separation in Foam Rubber Models of Earthquakes: a Possible Solution to the Heat Flow Paradox and the Paradox of Large Overthrusts, Tectonophysics, 1993, vol. 218, pp. 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Industry in the Seismic Regions. Construction Standards and Regulations. SNiP (Construction Standards and Regulations) II-7-81 (as amended in 1987, 1989, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2000), Moscow: GOSSTROI SSSR, 1981, pp. 1–67.

  • Costain, J.K., Bollinger, G.A., and Speer, J.A., Hydroseismicity: A Hypothesis for the Role of Water in the Generation of Intraplate Seismicity, Seismological Research Letters, 1987, vol. 58, pp. 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. and Aki, K., Fault Plane with Barriers: a Versatile Earthquake Model, J. Geophys. Res., 1977, vol. 82, pp. 5658–5670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T.N., Earthquake Prevention Techniques, Alaska Science Forum. March 8, 1979, article no. 296, http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForurn/ASF2/296.html

  • Dieterich, J.H., Modeling of Rock Friction: 1. Experimental Results and Constitutive Equations, J. Geophys. Res., 1979, vol. 84, pp. 2161–2168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filippov, A.E., Popov, V.L., Psakh’e, S.G., et al., On the Possibility of the Transfer of the Displacement Dynamics in the Block-Type Media under the Creep Conditions, Pis’ma v ZhTF, 2006, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galybin, A.N., Grigoryan, S.S., and Mukhamediev, Sh.A., Model of Induced Seismicity Caused by Water Injection, Proceedings SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics and Petroleum Engineering. 8–10 July, 1998. Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., 1998, vol. 1, pp. 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, R.J., Jackson, D.D., Kagan, Y.Y., and Mulargia, F., Earthquakes Cannot Be Predicted, Science, 1997, vol. 275, pp. 1616–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabovoi, G.P., The Methods for Prevention of Catastrophes and Equipment for its Realization, RF Patent No. RU 2148845; G01V9/00, G01V8/20, Russia (10 July 1999).

  • Healy, J.H., Hamilton, R.M., and Raleigh, S.B., Earthquakes Induced by Fluid Injection and Explosion, Tectonophysics, 1970, vol. 9, pp. 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, T.H., Evidence for and Implications of Self-Healing Pulses of Slip in Earthquake Rupture, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 1990, vol. 64, pp. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidbach, O., Tingay, M., Barth, A., Reinecker, J., Kurfess, D., and Muller, B., The World Stress Map Database Release 2008, doi:10.1594/GFZ.WSM.Rel2008, 2008, http://dc-app3-14.gfz-potsdam.de/

  • Hillers, G., Ben-Zion, Y., and Mai, P.M., Seismicity on a Fault Controlled by Rate- and State Dependent Friction with Spatial Variations of the Critical Slip Distance, J. Geophys. Res., 2006, vol. 111, B01403, doi:10.1029/2005JB003859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irsa, J., Galybin, A.N., and Mukhamediev, Sh.A., Identification of Stress Fields from Stress Orientations in Tsunamigenic Zones: SUMATRA and SAMOA, Abstract for AGU Fall Meeting. San-Francisco, USA, 14–18 December 2009. Control ID: 764229.

  • Jensen, H.J., Self-Organized Criticality—Emergent Complex Behavior in Physical and Biological Systems, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostrov, B.V., The Mechanics of the Source of Tectonic Earthquake, Moscow: Nauka, 1975, pp. 1–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapusta, N. and Rice J.R., Nucleation and Early Seismic Propagation of Small and Large Events in a Crustal Earthquake Model, J. Geophys. Res., 2003, vol. 108(B4), p.2205, doi:10.1029/2001JB000793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutsyuk, V.K. and Nikitin, A.N., The Methods for Earthquake Prevention, RF Patent No. RU 2107933; G01V9/00, G01V1/00, G01V3/00, Russia (27 June 1997).

  • Melosh, H.J., Dynamical Weakening of Faults by Acoustic Fluidization, Nature, 1996, vol. 379, pp. 601–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoev, K.M. and Negmatullaev, S.Kh., The Influence of Mechanical Vibrations on Seismicity, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1990, vol. 313, no. 1, pp. 78–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzoev, K.M., Nikolaev, A.V., Lukk, A.A., and Yunga, S.L., The Method of Relieving of the Elastic Energy in the Stressed Media for Eearthquake Prevention, RF Patent No. RU 2289151; Russia, (10 December 2006).

  • Mirzoev, K.M., Nikolaev, A.V., Lukk, A.A., and Yunga, S.L., Induced Seismicity and the Possibility of the Controlled Discharging of the Accumulated Tectonic Stresses in the Earth’s Crust, Fiz. Zemli, 2009, no. 10, pp. 49–68.

  • Mukhamediev, Sh.A. and Galybin, A.N., Where and How Did the Faults of the Earthquakes of December 26, 2004 and March 28, 2005 near Sumatra Originated, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2006, vol. 406, pp. 95–98. Doklady Earth Sciences (Engl. Transl.), 2006, vol. 406, pp. 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S. and Madariaga, R., On the Self-Healing Fracture Mode, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2003, vol. 93, pp. 2375–2388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaev, A.V., Earthquakes Induced by the Underground Nuclear Explosions, Vestnik Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1993, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, G., Rice, J.R., and Zheng, G., Self-Healing Slip Pulse on a Frictional Surface, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 1995, vol. 43, pp. 1461–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popov, V.L. and Starchevich, Ya., The Influence of Vibration Action on the Statistics of “Earthquakes” in the Laboratory Model, Pis’ma v ZhTF, 2006, vol. 32, no. 14, p.6571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R., Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 2nd Edition, London: Taylor & Francis Ltd., 2002, pp. 1–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psakh’e, S.G., Ruzhich, V.V., Shil’ko, et al., On the Influence of the Interface State on the Character of Local Displacements in the Fracture-Block and Interface Media, Pis’ma v ZhTF, 2005, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh, C.B., Healy, J.H., and Bredehoeft, J.D., An Experiment in Earthquake Control at Rangely, Colorado, Science, 1976, vol. 191, pp. 1230–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehbinder, P.A. and Shchukin, E.D., Surface Phenomena in Solids in the Processes of Their Deformation and Destruction, Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 1972, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.R. and Cocco M., Seismic Fault Rheology and Earthquake Dynamics, in Handy, M.R., Hirth, G., and Hovius, N., (eds.), Tectonic Faults: Agents of Change on a Dynamic Earth, Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 2007, pp. 99–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruina, A.L., Slip Instability and State Variable Friction Laws, J. Geophys. Res., 1983, vol. 88, pp. 10, 359–10, 370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadovskii, M.A., Mirzoev, K.M., Negmatullaev, S.Kh., and Salomov, N.G., The Influence of the Mechanical Microvibrations on the Character of Plastic Deformations of Materials, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. Zemli, 1981, no. 6, pp. 32–42.

  • Spiridovich, E.A., Gruzdev, A.M., and Marchenko, G.M., The Method of Action on the Volcanic System, RF Patent No. RU 2098850; G01V9/00, G01V11/00, Russia (09 October 1996). Talanov, B.P., The Methods for Earthquake Prevention, RF Patent No. RU 2099111; A62B37/00, Russia (28 October 1994).

  • Tarasov, N.T., A Change in the Crust Seismicity under the Electrical Influence, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1997, vol. 353, no. 4, pp. 542–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voisin, C., Renard, F., and Grasso, J.-R., Long Term Friction: From Stick-Slip to Stable Sliding, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2007, vol. 34, p.L13301, doi:10.1029/2007GL029715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K. and He, J., Mechanics of Low-Stress Forearcs: Nankai and Cascadia, J. Geophys. Res., 1999, vol. 104, pp. 15.191–15.205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Bol’shaya Gruzinskaya 10, Moscow, 123995, Russia

    Sh. A. Mukhamediev

Authors
  1. Sh. A. Mukhamediev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Original Russian Text ¢ Sh.A. Mukhamediev, 2010, published in Fizika Zemli, 2010, No. 11, pp. 49–60.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukhamediev, S.A. Prevention of strong earthquakes: Goal or utopia?. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 46, 955–965 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351310110054

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351310110054

Keywords

Search

Navigation