Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between the Organic Carbon Content and Structural State of Typical Chernozem

  • SOIL CHEMISTRY
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of erosion degree and slope aspect on the structural composition of typical chernozems (Haplic Chernozems) and the qualitative characteristics of organic matter in these soils were studied. We determined the organic carbon content in separate structural units of the soils under different agroecological conditions of Kursk oblast. Aggregates of 3–1 mm in size played the decisive role in the structural state of typical chernozems; their total content and the content of carbon of organic compounds in them were higher than those for the aggregates of 10–3 and <1 mm in size. The contribution of organic matter and labile humic substances to the formation of water-stable soil aggregates was also considered. A tendency for an increase in the diameter of aggregates with an increase in their organic carbon content was displayed in the soils independently from the degree of their erosion. The content of carbon of labile humic substances in water-stable aggregates of the soils on north-facing slopes was higher than that in the soils on south-facing slopes. With an increase in the portion of labile humus participating in the formation of water-stable aggregates of typical chernozems, the diameter of these aggregates increased from 0.5–0.25 to 3–1 mm. This regularity was clearly displayed in the Ap and A horizons of typical chernozems on the interfluve and on the north-facing slope and in the Ap horizon of these soils on the south-facing slopes independently from the degree of soil erosion. The results of this study may be used in methodological recommendations on regulation of the aggregate and humus states of typical chernozems in agrolandscapes with sloping topography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. I. N. Antipov-Karataev and A. P. Rabinerson, “The study of soil colloids,” Tr. Leningr. Otd., Inst. Udobr. Agropochvoved., No. 10, (1930).

  2. O. G. Bushueva, A. V. Gorobets, N. G. Dobrovol’skaya, Z. P. Kiryukhina, G. A. Larionov, and L. F. Litvin, “Destruction of inter-aggregate bonds between soil particles in the course of water erosion,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 78, 20–30 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. F. Vadyunina and Z. A. Korchagina, Methods for Studying Soil Physical Properties (Agropromizdat, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. D. Voronin, Fundamentals of Soil Physics (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. A. Dmitriev, Mathematical Statistics in Soil Science (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. V. Dokuchaev, Our Steppes Before and Now (1892): Collection of Research Works (Nauka, Moscow, 1952) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. A. Dospekhov, Methods of Field Experiments with Statistical Data Analysis (Kolos, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. N. Zaslavskii and A. N. Kashtanov, Soil-Protective Farming (Rossel’khozizdat, Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. A. Kachinskii, Soil Physics (Moscow, 1965), Part 1 [in Russian].

  10. V. I. Kiryushkin, Agronomic Soil Science (Kolos, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Classification and Diagnostics of Soils of the Soviet Union (Kolos, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

  12. L. L. Shishov, V. D. Tonkonogov, I. I. Lebedeva, and M. I. Gerasimova, Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. M. Kogut, S. A. Sysuev, and V. A. Kholodov, “Water stability and labile humic substances of typical chernozems under different land uses,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 496–502 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Kremlev, Mathematics: Section Statistics (Ural State Law Acad., Yekaterinburg, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. V. Kuznetsova, V. F. Utkaeva, and A. G. Bondarev, “ Normatives of changes in the physical properties of chernozems in the forest-steppe zone of European Russia under conditions of their intensive agricultural use,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 1194–1202 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. P. Masyutenko, B. M. Kogut, O. V. Kiseleva, E. V. Dubovik, G. P. Glazunov, and T. I. Pankova, The Structure of Ordinary Chernozem and the Content of Organic Carbon and Labile Humic Substances in Soil Aggregates (All-Russia Research Institute of Arable Farming and Soil Erosion Control, Kursk, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. A. Nakonechnaya and V. E. Yavtushenko, “Humus losses on slope soils of the central chernozemic region,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 19–26 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. A. Netesonova, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2010).

  19. Recommendations for Analysis of Balance and Transformation of Organic Matter during Agricultural Use and Intensive Cultivation of Soils (Moscow, 1984) [in Russian].

  20. V. M. Semenov and B. M. Kogut, Soil Organic Matter (GEOS, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. P. Surmach, Relief Formation, Forest-Steppe Development, Modern Erosion, and Erosion Control Measures (All-Union Research Institute of Agroforestry, Volgograd, 1992) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu. P. Sukhanovskii, A. V. Prushchik, Yu. A. Solov’eva, and S. I. Sanzharova, “Permissible losses of soils due to erosion and problem solution,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 78, 3–19 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. D. Khaidapova, V. V. Chestnova, E. V. Shein, and E. Yu. Milanovskii, “Rheological properties of typical chernozems (Kursk oblast) under different land uses,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 890–897 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229316080044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. V. Khan, Organomineral Compounds and Soil Structure (Nauka, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. V. Shein and L. O. Karpachevskii, Explanatory Dictionary of Soil Physics (GEOS, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. V. Shein and E. Yu. Milanovskii, “The role of organic matter in the formation and stability of soil aggregates,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 36, 51–58 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. F. Yurinskaya, “Specific microbiological activity in typical chernozems depending on their washing, element and slope exposure,” Pochvozashch. Zemledelie, No. 1 (36), 54–60 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. J. Bronick and R. Lal, “Soil structure and management: a review,” Geoderma 124, 3–22 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. B. Dobrzanski, B. Witkowska, and R. Walczak, “Soil aggregation and water stability index,” Pol. J. Soil Sci. 8 (1), 3–8 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. T. Elliott, “Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 627–633 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. D. Jastrow, R. M. Miller, and T. W. Boutton, “Carbon dynamics of aggregate-associated organic matter estimated by carbon-13 natural abundance,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60, 801–807 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. D. Jastrow, “Soil aggregate formation and the accrual of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 657–676 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. B. John, T. Yamashita, B. Ludwig, and H. Flessa, “Storage of organic carbon in aggregate and density fractions of silty soils under different types of land use,” Geoderma 128, 63–79 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J. M. Oades and A. G. Water, “Aggregate hierarchy in soils,” Aust. J. Soil Res. 29, 815–828 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Puget, C. Chenu, and J. Balesdent, “Total and young organic matter distributions in aggregates of silty cultivated soils,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 46, 449–459 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Six, K. Paustian, E. T. Elliott, and C. Combrink, “Soil structure and organic matter. I. Distribution of aggregate–size classes and aggregate–associated carbon,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 681–689 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Report No. 106 (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2015).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Dubovik.

Additional information

Translated by L. Kholopova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dubovik, E.V., Dubovik, D.V. Relationships between the Organic Carbon Content and Structural State of Typical Chernozem. Eurasian Soil Sc. 52, 150–161 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319020042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319020042

Keywords:

Navigation