Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Soil Types and Subtypes in N-Dimensional Space of Multitemporal (Empirical) Soil Line

  • Genesis and Geography of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A classical soil line (SL) in the RED–NIR spectral space is specified by two coefficients “a” and “b.” In this form, it does not characterize soil types and subtypes. A multitemporal soil line (MSL) represents the major axis of the ellipse describing all possible pairs of RED–NIR values characterizing a bare soil surface for a given pixel of remote sensing images. The MSL in the RED–NIR spectral space is specified by several (N) coefficients. The resulting N-dimensional space of MSL coefficients makes it possible to give unique characteristics for each type and subtype of soils in the following zonal soil sequence: soddy-podzolic soils, light gray forest soils, gray forest soils, dark gray forest soils, podzolized chernozems, and leached chernozems. The analysis of variance allows us to state that the soils of this sequence significantly differ from one another in the characteristic sets of MSL coefficients. In other words, these coefficients characterize soil types and subtypes, and the MSL can be considered an empirical soil line (ESL) of the given type and subtype of soil. A classical SL is an integrity of ESLs of different soils within the given scene of remote sensing data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Bryzzhev, D. I. Rukhovich, P. V. Koroleva, N. V. Kalinina, E. V. Vil’chevskaya, E. A. Dolinina, and S. V. Rukhovich, “Organization of retrospective monitoring of the soil cover in Azov district of Rostov oblast,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 1029–1049 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. V. Koroleva, D. I. Rukhovich, A. D. Rukhovich, D. D. Rukhovich, A. L. Kulyanitsa, A. V. Trubnikov, N. V. Kalinina, and M. S. Simakova, “Location of Bare Soil Surface and Soil Line on the RED–NIR Spectral Plane,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 1375–1385 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Kostikova, Atmospheric correction of Landsat/ETM+ data (COST method), GIS-Lab, 2006. http://gis-lab. info/qa/atcor.html.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Kostikova, Conversion of TM, ETM+ data to radiation indices on the sensor, GIS-Lab, 2004. http://gislab. info/qa/dn2radiance.html.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. L. Kulyanitsa, P. V. Koroleva, D. I. Rukhovich, A. D. Rukhovich, D. D. Rukhovich, and M. S. Simakova, “Frequency of occurrence of bare soil surface as a quantitative parameter of the intensity of land use,” Inf. Kosmos, No. 1, 139–145 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. L. Kulyanitsa, A. D. Rukhovich, D. D. Rukhovich, P. V. Koroleva, D. I. Rukhovich, and M. S. Simakova, “The application of the piecewise linear approximation to the spectral neighborhood of soil line for the analysis of the quality of normalization of remote sensing materials,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 387–395 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. I. Rukhovich, V. B. Wagner, E. V. Vil’chevskaya, N. V. Kalinina, and P. V. Koroleva, “Problems of using digitized thematic maps on the territory of the former soviet union upon the creation of the “Soils of Russia” geographic information system,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 957–968 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. I. Rukhovich, P. V. Koroleva, E. V. Vil’chevskaya, and N. V. Kalinina, “Digital thematic cartography as the shift of available sources and their use,” in Theoretical and Practical Studies in the Field of Digital Soil Mapping in Russia (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 2012), pp. 58–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. I. Rukhovich, A. D. Rukhovich, D. D. Rukhovich, E. V. Vil’chevskaya, G. A. Suleiman, and N. V. Kalinina, “Application of soil line for creating the maps of averaged spectral deviations and their soil interpretation,” Inf. Kosmos 5 (3), 125–142 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. I. Rukhovich, A. D. Rukhovich, D. D. Rukhovich, M. S. Simakova, A. L. Kulyanitsa, A. V. Bryzzhev, and P. V. Koroleva, “The informativeness of coefficients a and b of the soil line for the analysis of remote sensing materials,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 831–845 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. I. Rukhovich, A. D. Rukhovich, D. D. Rukhovich, M. S. Simakova, A. L. Kulyanitsa, A. V. Bryzzhev, and P. V. Koroleva, “Maps of averaged spectral deviations from soil lines and their comparison with traditional soil maps,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 49, 739–756 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. I. Rukhovich, M. S. Simakova, A. L. Kulyanitsa, A. V. Bryzzhev, N. V. Kalinina, P. V. Koroleva, E. V. Vil’chevskaya, E. A. Dolinina, and S. V. Rukhovich, “Analysis of the application of soil maps for retrospective monitoring of the soil cover,” Pochvovedenie., No. 5, 605–625 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. J. Kauth and G. S. Thomas, “The tasseled cap—a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data (Purdue University of West Lafayette, West Lafayette, 1976), pp. 4B-41–4B-51

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. J. Kriegler, W. A. Malila, R. F. Nalepka, and W. Richardson, “Preprocessing transformations and their effects on multispectral recognition,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (University of Michigan, Ann Arbo, 1969), pp. 97–131.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Qi, Y. Kerr, and A. Chehbouni, “External factor consideration in vegetation index development,” Proceedings of Sixth International Symposium “Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing” (Val d'Isère, 1994), pp. 723–730.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. J. Richardson and C. L. Wiegand, “Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 43, 1541–1552 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. W. Rouse, R. H. Haas, J. A. Schell, and D. W. Deering, “Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS,” Proceedings of Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, 1973), Vol. 1, pp. 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. D. Rukhovich, D. D. Rukhovich, and D. I. Rukhovich, “Applying the elastic map method to analyze three-dimensional distribution of the soil line coefficients,” Proceedings International Conference “Global Soil Map 2017,” Moscow, Russia, July 4–6, 2017 (Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Moscow, 2017), p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. V. Koroleva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © P.V. Koroleva, D.I. Rukhovich, A.D. Rukhovich, D.D. Rukhovich, A.L. Kulyanitsa, A.V. Trubnikov, N.V. Kalinina, M.S. Simakova, 2018, published in Pochvovedenie, 2018, No. 9, pp. 1085–1098.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koroleva, P.V., Rukhovich, D.I., Rukhovich, A.D. et al. Characterization of Soil Types and Subtypes in N-Dimensional Space of Multitemporal (Empirical) Soil Line. Eurasian Soil Sc. 51, 1021–1033 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318090065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318090065

Keywords

Navigation