Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term dynamics of anthropogenic solonetzicity in soils of the Eastern okrug of Moscow under the impact of deicing salts

  • Degradation, Rehabilitation, and Conservation of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The long-term dynamics of the anthropogenic soil solonetzicity under the impact of applied deicing salts were studied in the Eastern administrative okrug (EAO) of Moscow. The composition and amount of the applied agents and distribution patterns of sodium in snowmelt water and in soils of different land-use zones were analyzed. The maps of soil solonetzization in the EAO in 1989, 2005, and 2010 were compiled, and the degree of degradation of the soil cover was evaluated. It was shown that the contrast of the technogenic anomalies in the content of exchangeable sodium and the size of these anomalies in soils of the okrug increase with time. In 21 years, the mean content of exchangeable sodium in the surface soil layer increased from 0.38 to 0.80 cmol(equiv.)/kg, and the degree of solonetzicity (as judged from the exchangeable sodium percentage) increased from 3.1 to 7.2%. In 2005–2010, the rates of sodium accumulation in the soil adsorption complex were twice as high as those in 1989–2005.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. N. Vasilenko, I. M. Nazarov, and Sh. D. Fridman, Monitoring of the Snow Cover Contamination (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. A. Vasil’ev, “Ecological problems related to the application of deicing salts in a city,” XV International Conf. “Lomonosov-8,” April 8–12, 2008, Abstracts of Papers (Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. O. Gerasimov, “Assessment of toxicity of new deicers for the higher plants,” Ekol. Prom. Ross. Anal. Metod. Prognozy, No. 3, 58–62. (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. I. Gerasimova, M. N. Stroganova, N. V. Mozharova, and T. V. Prokof’eva, Anthropogenic Soils: Genesis, Geography, and Reclamation, Ed. by G. V. Dobrovolsky (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2003) [in Russian].

  5. Report on the State of the Environment in Moscow in 2010 (Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

  6. I. D. Eremina and A. V. Grigor’ev, “Acidity and chemical composition of the snow cover in Moscow and Moscow region in 1999–2006,” Vest. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., No. 2, 56–60 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Salt-Affected Soils of Russia, Ed. by L. L. Shishov and E. I. Pankova (Akademkniga, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

  8. N. S. Kasimov, “Methodology of landscape-geochemical analysis of the cities,” in Ecogeochemistry of the Cities (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1995), pp. 6–39.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. S. Kasimov, N. E. Kosheleva, D. V. Vlasov, and E. V. Terskaya, “Geochemistry of the snow cover in the Eastern district of Moscow,” Vest. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., No. 4, 14–25 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. S. Kasimov and E. M. Nikiforova, “Geochemistry of the cities and urban landscapes,” in Ecology of the Cities, Ed. by A. S. Kurbatova (Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow, 2004), pp. 234–268.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. S. Kasimov, E. M. Nikiforova, N. E. Kosheleva, and T. S. Khaibrakhmanov, “Geoinformation landscapegeochemical cartography of urban territories by example of Moscow. 1. Cartographic support,” Geoinformatika, No. 4, 37–45 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. A. Kovda, Problems of Desertification and Salinization in Arid Regions of the World, Ed. by E. I. Pankova and I. P. Aidarov (Nauka, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

  13. N. E. Kosheleva, N. S. Kasimov, and E. M. Nikiforova, “Modern eco-geochemical state of soils in Moscow,” in Ecological Problems of Industrial Cities (Saratov, 2011), pp. 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. E. Kosheleva and E. M. Nikiforova, “Anthropogenic transformation of the physicochemical properties of urban soils and its impact on lead accumulation,” in Proc. II Int. Conf. “Modern Problems of Soil Pollution” (Moscow, 2007), pp. 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A Method for Evaluation of Damage from Soil Degradation (Russian Federation Ministry of the Environment, Moscow, 1994) [in Russian].

  16. Methodological Recommendations on the Assessment of the Degree of Air Pollution by Heavy Metals in Settlements on the Basis of Data on Their Contents in the Snow Cover and Soils, Ed. by B. A. Revich, Yu. E. Saet, and R. S. Smirnova (Institute of Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Crystal Chemistry of Rare Earth Elements, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

  17. E. M. Nikiforova, N. S. Kasimov, and N. E. Kosheleva, “Long-term dynamics of the anthropogenic salinization of soils in Moscow (by the example of the Eastern district),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 47 (3), 203–215 (2014). doi 10.7868/S0032180X1403006X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. F. Nikolaev, O. V. Otskheli, E. B. Porshaleva, et al., Deicers and Their Impact on the Enviroment (Dialog-MGU, Moscow, 1998) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. I. Obukhov and O. M. Lepneva, “Ecological consequences of the application of deicing mixtures on urban highways and mitigation measures,” Proceedings of Scientific Practical Conf. “Ecological Studies in Moscow and Moscow Oblast” (Moscow, 1990), pp. 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. S. Orlov, Soil Chemistry (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. O. Poputnikov, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soil, City, Ecology, Ed. by G. V. Dobrovolsky (Za Ekonomich. Gramotnost Foundation, Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].

  23. T. V. Prokof’eva, I. A. Martynenko, and F. A. Ivannikov, “Classification of Moscow soils and parent materials and its possible inclusion in the classification system of Russian Soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44 (5), 561–571 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. V. G. Sister and V. E. Koretskii, Engineering Protection of the Water System of a Northern Megalopolis in the Winter Period (Moscow State University of Environmental Engineering, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. V. Smagin, N. A. Azovtseva, M. V. Smagina, A. L. Stepanov, A. D. Myagkova, A. S. Kurbatova, “Criteria and methods to assess the ecological status of soils in relation to the landscaping of urban territories,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 39 (5), 539–551 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N. P. Solntseva, “Geochemical tolerance of ecosystems towards technogenic loads: principles and methods of study, forecast criteria,” in Mining of Minerals and Geochemistry of Ecosystems (Nauka, Moscow, 1982), pp. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  27. State of Green Plantations and Forests in Moscow. Analytical Report Based on Monitoring Data for 1999 (Prima-Press, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].

  28. N. B. Khitrov, “Physical and chemical conditions of development of solonchak processes in soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 3, 298–307 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. M. Khomyakov, “Deicers on the roads of Moscow: experience of last decade,” Dorozhn. Derzhava, No. 47, 92–96 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. I. Chernousenko, I. A. Yamnova, M. I. Skripnikova, and T. I. Borisochkina, “On salinization and heavy metal pollution of soils in the southeastern district of Moscow,” Dokl. Ross. Akad. S-kh. Nauk, No. 1, 21–24 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. I. Chernousenko, I. A. Yamnova, and M. N. Skripnikova, “Anthropogenic salinization of soils in Moscow,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 36 (1), 92–100 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. I. Shevyakova, V. V. Kuznetsov, and L. O. Karpachevskii, “Factors and mechanisms of withering of green plantations under the impact of urban loads and the creation of stress-tolerant phytocenoses,” Lesn. Vestn. 15 (6), 25–33 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ecological Atlas of Moscow (ABF/ABF, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].

  34. C. Amrhein, J. E. Strong, and P. A. Mosher, “Effect of deicing salts on metal and organic matter mobilization in roadside soils,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 2, 703–709 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Bäckström, S. Karlsson, L. Bäckman, L. Folkeson, and B. Lind, “Mobilization of heavy metals by deicing salts in a roadside environment,” Water Res. 38, 720–732 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. C. B. Brady and R. R. Weil, The Nature and Properties of Soils (Prentice Hall, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  37. G. M. Bryson and A. V. Barker, “Sodium accumulation in soils and plants along Massachusetts roadsides,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33 (1–2), 67–78 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. I. Czerniawska-Kusza, G. Kusza, and M. Duzynski, “Effect of deicing salts on urban soils and health status of roadside trees in the Opole region,” Environ Toxicol. 19 (4), 296–301 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Joutti, E. Schultz, P. Pessala, T. Nistén, and P. Hellstén, “Ecotoxicity of alternative deicers,” J. Soils Sediments 3 (4), 269–272 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. S.-Y. Kim and C. Koretsky, “Effects of road salt deicers on sediment biogeochemistry,” Biogeochemistry 112 (1–3), 343–358 (2013). doi 10.1007/s10533-012-9728-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. F. Li, Y. Zhang, Z. Fan, and K. Oh, “Accumulation of deicing salts and its short-term effect on metal mobility in urban roadside soils,” Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 94 (4), 525–531 (2015). doi 10.1007/s00128-015-1481-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. S. S. Nelson, D. R. Yonge, and M. E. Barber, “Effects of road salts on heavy metal mobility in two eastern Washington soils,” J. Environ. Eng. 135 (7), 505–510 (2009). doi 10.1061//asce/0733-9372/2009/135:7/505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. A.-C. Norrström and B. Bergstedt, “The impact of road de-icing salts (NaCl) on colloid dispersion and base cation pools in roadside soils,” Water Air Soil Pollut. 127, 281–299 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. D. Ramakrishna and T. Viraraghavan, “Environmental impact of chemical deicers—a review,” Water Air Soil Pollut. 166, 49–63 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. I. Shainberg and J. Letey, “Response of soils to sodic and saline conditions,” Hilgardia 52 (2), 1–57 (1984). doi 10.3733/hilg.v52n02p057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. X. Shi, L. Fay, C. Gallaway, et al., Evaluation of Alternative Anti-Icing and Deicing Compounds Using Sodium Chloride and Magnesium Chloride as Baseline Deicers—Phase I. Report No. CDOT-2009-I (Western Transportation Inst., Bozeman, MT, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Foreign experience: 5 deicing reagents, The Village. http:// www.the-village.ru/village/situation/abroad/ 111529-vstrechaem-ldom-i-solyu-5-sposobov-izbavitsyaot-snega.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. E. Kosheleva.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.M. Nikiforova, N.S. Kasimov, N.E. Kosheleva, 2017, published in Pochvovedenie, 2017, No. 1, pp. 93–104.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikiforova, E.M., Kasimov, N.S. & Kosheleva, N.E. Long-term dynamics of anthropogenic solonetzicity in soils of the Eastern okrug of Moscow under the impact of deicing salts. Eurasian Soil Sc. 50, 84–94 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229317010100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229317010100

Keywords

Navigation