Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of Radiation Losses and Effective Ion Charge on the Globus-M2 Tokamak

  • Published:
Technical Physics Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this Letter, results of measurements of radiation losses Prad and effective ion charge Zeff in the conditions of magnetic field up to 0.7 T and plasma current up to 300 kA for a wide range of electron density first obtained on the Globus-M2 tokamak are presented. The analysis of the results shows the decrease in the radiation losses share of the input power on the Globus-M2 tokamak as compared with the same parameter for the Globus-M facility. A large dip at the center of the Prad power profiles is revealed. A decrease in the Zeff values is observed with an increase in electron density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. B. Minaev, V. K. Gusev, N. V. Sakharov, Yu.V. Petrov, V. I. Varfolomeev, N. N. Bakharev, V. A. Belyakov, P. N. Brunkov, V. V. Bulanin, F. V. Cher-nyshev, V. I. Davydenko, V. V. Dyachenko, A. A. Kavin, S. A. Khitrov, N. A. Khromov, et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1094, 012001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1094/1/012001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. B. Minaev, V. K. Gusev, N. V. Sakharov, V. I. Varfolomeev, N. N. Bakharev, V. A. Belyakov, E. N. Bondarchuk, P. N. Brunkov, F. V. Chernyshev, V. I Davydenko, V. V. Dyachenko, A. A. Kavin, S. A. Khitrov, N. A. Khromov, E. O. Kiselev, et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 066047 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa69e0

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. K. Gusev, N. N. Bakharev, V. A. Belyakov, B. Ya. Ber, E. N. Bondarchuk, V. V. Bulanin, A. S. Bykov, F. V. Chernyshev, E. V. Demina, V. V. Dyachenko, P. R. Goncharov, A. E. Gorodetsky, E. Z. Gusakov, A. D. Iblyaminova, A. A. Ivanov, et al., Nucl. Fusion 55, 104016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/55/10/104016

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. N. N. Bakharev, I. M. Balachenkov, V. I. Varfolomeev, A. V. Voronin, V. K. Gusev, V. V. D’yachenko, M. V. Il’yasova, E. O. Kiselev, A. N. Konovalov, G. S. Kurskiev, A. D. Mel’nik, V. B. Minaev, I. V. Miroshnikov, A. N. Novokhatskii, M. I. Patrov, et al., Plasma Phys. Rep. 46, 675 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31857/S036729212007001X

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. V. Hofmann, Report IPP III/174 (Garching, Germany, 1991).

  6. E. A. Tukhmeneva, S. Yu. Tolstyakov, G. S. Kurskiev, V. K. Gusev, V. B. Minaev, Yu. V. Petrov, N. V. Sa-kharov, A. Yu. Telnova, N. N. Bakharev, P. B. Shchegolev, and E. O. Kiselev, Plasma Sci. Technol. 21, 105104 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-6272/ab305f

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. S. Kurskiev, S. Yu. Tolstyakov, A. A. Berezutskii, V. K. Gusev, M. M. Kochergin, V. B. Minaev, E. E. Mukhin, M. I. Patrov, Yu. V. Petrov, N. V. Sakharov, V. V. Semenov, and P. V. Chernakov, Vopr. At. Nauki Tekh., Ser. Termoyad. Sintez, No. 2, 81 (2012). https://doi.org/10.21517/0202-3822-2012-35-2-81-88

  8. Y. Chen, Z. Wu, W. Gao, L. Zhang, and W. Zha, Fusion Eng. Des. 88, 2825 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Sarwar, H. K. Na, and J. M. Park, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 043504 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5004217

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. P. Artyomov, E. H. Baksht, V. F. Tarasenko, A. V. Fedunin, S. A. Chaikovsky, P. N. Aruev, V. V. Zabrodskii, M. V. Petrenko, N. A. Sobolev, and V. L. Suhanov, Instrum. Exp. Tech. 58, 102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441215010017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. D. Sladkomedova, A. G. Alekseev, N. N. Bakharev, V. K. Gusev, N. A. Khromov, G. S. Kurskiev, V. B. Minaev, M. I. Patrov, Yu. V. Petrov, N. V. Sakharov, P. B. Shchegolev, V. V. Solokha, A. Yu. Telnova, S. Yu. Tolstyakov, and V. V. Zabrodsky, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 083509 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5039801

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. V. K. Gusev, T. A. Burtsev, A. V. Dech, G. A. Gavrilov, V. E. Golant, S. V. Krikunov, R. G. Levin, V. B. Minaev, A. B. Mineev, O. A. Minyaev, E. E. Mukhin, A. N. Novokhatskii, Yu. V. Petrov, E. N. Rumyantsev, N. V. Sakharov, and V. M. Sharapov, Nucl. Fusion 41, 919 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/41/7/313

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Fuchs, D. Coster, A. Herrmann, A. Kallenbach, K. F. Mast, and ASDEX Upgrade Team, J. Nucl. Mater. 290–293, 525 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00645-0

Download references

Funding

The study of radiation losses carried out by the E.A. Tukhmeneva, G.S. Kurskiev, V.B. Minaev, N.V. Sa-kharov, E.O. Kiselev, A.Yu. Telnova, N.N. Bakharev, and P.B. Shchegolev was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 17-72-20076.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Tukhmeneva.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by N. Semenova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tukhmeneva, E.A., Bakharev, N.N., Varfolomeev, V.I. et al. Measurement of Radiation Losses and Effective Ion Charge on the Globus-M2 Tokamak. Tech. Phys. Lett. 47, 56–60 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785021010272

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063785021010272

Keywords:

Navigation