Skip to main content
Log in

Oxygen Ion Beam Dynamics Simulation in the 7.5 MeV/u Injector Linac

  • PARTICLE ACCELERATORS FOR NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of the Oxygen 5+ beam dynamics simulation in the regular section of a 7,5 MeV/u linear accelerator are presented. Linear accelerator LU-1 consists of several ion sources, RFQ section (Radio Frequency Quadrupole) and two groups of identical IH (Interdigital H-type) cavities. Beam transport between the accelerating sections is done via low energy (LEBT) line, two medium energy MEBT-1 and MEBT-2 lines, and high energy (HEBT) line that transfers the beam to the booster synchrotron or a beam dump. This paper contains the results on Oxygen 5+ A/Z = 3.2 beam dynamics end-to-end simulation in the LU-1 sections ( LEBT, RFQ, MEBT-1, MEBT-2 beam transport lines and both groups of IH cavities).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

REFERENCES

  1. S. M. Polozov et al., in Proceedings of the RuPAC’21, Alushta, Russia, Sept.-Oct. 2021, p. 51. https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-RuPAC2021-TUB07

  2. E. S. Masunov and S. M. Polozov, Vopr. At. Nauki Tekh., Ser.: Yad. Fiz. Issled., No. 3 (47), 119 (2006).

  3. E. S. Masunov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 558, 184 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. V. Samoshin, in Proceedings of the LINAC2012, Tel-Aviv, Israel (2012), p. 630.

  5. D. Uriot and N. Pichoff, in Proceedings of the 6th International Particle Accelerator Conference IPAC'15, Richmond, VA, USA, p. 92. https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2015-MOPWA008

  6. K. Crandall and D. Rusthoi, Report LA-UR-90-4146 (Los Alamos Natl. Labor., 1990).

  7. V. S. Dyubkov, in Proceedings of the RuPAC'21, Alushta, Russia, 2021, p. 355.

  8. M. Bres et al., Part. Accel. 2, 17 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Weis, H. Klein, and A. Schempp, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 30 (4) (1983).

  10. S. Kurennoy, L. Rybarcyk, and T. Wangler, in Proceedings of the PAC'07, Albuquerque, NM (2007), p. 3824.

  11. S. Kurennoy, J. O’Hara, and L. Rybarcyk, in Proceedings of the HB 2008, August 27, 2008.

  12. A. A. Gorchakov, M. A. Gusarova, M. V. Lalayan, et al., Phys. At. Nucl. 84, 2018 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. D. Kilpatrick, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 28, 824 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1715731

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Lozeeva.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lozeeva, T.A., Dyubkov, V.S., Osin, R.A. et al. Oxygen Ion Beam Dynamics Simulation in the 7.5 MeV/u Injector Linac. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 86, 2689–2695 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778823100289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778823100289

Keywords:

Navigation