Skip to main content
Log in

Phenetic relationships of six species of mullets (Mugilidae) from the south Adriatic, as inferred from the study of the visceral and dermal skeleton

  • Ichthyology
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the interspecific variability and phenetic relationships in six southern Adriatic mullet species: Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758), Chelon labrosus (Risso, 1826), Liza aurata (Risso, 1810), Liza ramada (Risso, 1826), Liza saliens (Risso, 1810), and Oedalechilus labeo (Cuvier, 1829). Twenty-three morphometric characteristics of the visceral skeleton and the dermatocranium of mullets were analyzed. The major distinguishing characters were those of the jaws. M. cephalus was clearly separated from the other species; O. labeo differed to a somewhat smaller extent; and C. labrosus was the least distinguished species. The species of the genus Liza were phenetically most similar, while the other species of mullet differed significantly from them. The greatest distances were between M. cephalus and C. labrosus, as well as between M. cephalus and O. labeo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Autem, M. and Bonhomme, F., Elements de Systematique Biochimique chez les Mugilides de Mediterranee, Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 1980, no. 8, pp. 305–308.

  2. Burdak, V. D., Osobennosti ontogeneticheskogo razvitiia i filogeneticheskie otnosheniia chernomorskih kefalei (Mugil saliens Risso, Mugil auratus Risso, Mugil cephalus Linnaeus), In: Trudy Sevastopol. Sta., 1957, no. 9, pp. 243–273.

  3. Caldara, F., Bargelloni, L., Ostellari, L., Penzo, E., Colombo, L., and Patarnello T., Molecular Phylogeny of Grey Mullets Based on Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Analysis: Evidence of a Differential Rate of Evolution at the Intrafamily Level, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1996, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 416–424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cataudella, S., Civitelli, M., and Capanna, E., Chromosome Complements of the Mediterranean Mullets (Pisces: Perciformes), Caryologia, 1974, vol. 27, pp. 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rohlf, F. J., NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 1.50, New York: Exeter Publishing Ltd. & Applied Biostatistics Inc., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schultz, L. P., A Revision of the Genera of Mullets, Fishes of the Family Mugilidae, with Descriptions of Three New Genera, Proc. U. S. Natn. Mus., 1946, vol. 96, pp. 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R., Numerical taxonomy, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co., 1973, pp. 573.

    Google Scholar 

  8. SAS Package (PROC CANDISC), SAS Inc., 1991.

  9. Statistica Package, Release 4.5, StatSoft, Inc., 1993.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This text was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antović, I., Simonović, P. Phenetic relationships of six species of mullets (Mugilidae) from the south Adriatic, as inferred from the study of the visceral and dermal skeleton. Russ J Mar Biol 32, 250–254 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074006040080

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074006040080

Key words

Navigation