Abstract
The problem of motion of different test particles, charged and spinning objects with a constant spin tensor in different versions of the bimetric theory of gravity is considered by deriving their corresponding path and path deviation equations using a modified Bazanski Lagrangian. Such a Lagrangian, as in the framework of Riemannian geometry, has a capability to obtain path and path deviations of any object simultaneously. This method enables us to derive the path and path deviation equations of different objects orbiting in very strong gravitational fields.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. Wheeler, Gravitation (San Francisco, Freeman, 1973).
A. Papapetrou, Proc, Roy. Irish Acad. Section A 52, 11 (1948).
N. Rosen, Gen. Rel. Grav. 4, 435 (1973).
N. Rosen, Ann. Phys. 84, 455 (1974).
H. Yalmoz, Gen. Rel. Grav. 6, 269 (1975).
J. W. Moffat, hep-th/0208122.
J. W. Moffat, quant-ph/0204151 (2002).
J. W. Moffat, arXiv: 1110.1330.
J. W. Moffat, arXiv: 1306.5470.
M. Milgrom, Astroph. J. 270, 365 (1983).
M. Milgrom, Phys. Rev. D 80, 123536 (2009); arXiv: 0912.0790.
M. Milgrom, arXiv: 1404.7661.
M. Milgrom Phys. Rev. D 89, 024027 (2014); arXiv: 1308.5388.
S. F. Hassan and Rachel A. Rosen, arXiv: 1109.3515.
K. Aoki and K. Maeda, arXiv: 1409.0202.
R. MAvakian, E. V. Churabian, and H. A. Grigiorian, Astron. Nachr. 309, 229 (1988).
L. V. Verozub arXiv: 0911.5512.
L. V. Verozub, Space-time, Relativity and Gravitation (Lambert Academic Publishing, 2015).
M. Israelit, Gen. Rel. Grav. 7, 623 (1976).
D. Falik and R. Opher, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 192, 75 (1980).
S. L. Bazanski, J. Math. Phys. 30, 1018 (1989).
M. I. Wanas, M. Melek, and M. E. Kahil, Astroph. Space Sci. 228, 273 (1995).
M. I. Wanas, M. Melek, and M. E. Kahil, Grav. Cosmol. 4, 319 (2000).
M. I. Wanas and M. E. Kahil, Gen. Rel. Grav. 31 1921 (2000); gr-qc/9912007.
M. E. Kahil, J. Math. Phys. 47, 052501 (2006).
M. E. Kahil, WSEAS Transaction of Mathematics 10 (12), 454 (2011).
M. E. Kahil, Hyperion Int. J. of Econophysics and New Economy 7 (1), 62 (2014).
A. Papapetrou, Proc. R. Soc. London A 209, 248 (1951).
W. G. Dixon, Proc. R. Soc. London A 314, 499 (1970).
E. Corinaldesi and A. Papapetrou, Proc. R. Soc. London A 209, 259 (1951).
M. Pavsic and M. E. Kahil, Central Eur. J. Phys. 10, 414 (2012); arXiv: 1012.2258.
C. Romero, J. B. Fonseca-Neto, and M. L. Pucheu, arXiv: 1201.1469.
J. D. Bekenstein, gr-qc/9211017.
M. E. Kahil and T. Harko, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24, 667 (2009); arXiv: 0809.1915.
D. Falik and N. Rosen, Gen. Rel. Grav. 13, 599 (1981).
Y. Akrami, T. Koivisto, and A. R. Solomon, arXiv: 1404. 0006.
S. Hossenfelder, arXiv: 0807. 2838.
J. Foukzon, S. A. Podosenov, A. A. Potapov, and E. Menkova, arXiv: 1007. 3290.
M. I. Wanas, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24, 1749 (2009).
M. I. Wanas and Mona M. Kamal, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 2065 (2011); arXiv: 1103.4121.
M. I. Wanas, M. E. Kahil, and Mona M. Kamal, Grav. Cosmol. 22, 345 (2016).
I. T. Drummond, Phys. Rev. D 63, 043503 (2001); astro-ph/0008234.
Magd E. Kahil, Odessa Astron. Publ. 28, 126 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kahil, M.E. Motion in bimetric type theories of gravity. Gravit. Cosmol. 23, 70–79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289317010066
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289317010066