Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of nitrate leaching from two soils amended with biosolids

  • Water Quality and Protection: Environmental Aspects
  • Published:
Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High concentrations of N and P in biosolids are one of the strongest appeals for their agronomic use. However, it is essential to understand the fate of N in soils treated with biosolids for both plant nutrition and managing the environmental risk of NO 3 -N leaching. This work aims to evaluate the risk of nitrate leaching from a sandy Podosol soil and from a clay Ferrosol soil, each one amended at the range 0.5–8.0 dry Mg/ha rates of freshly tertiary sewage sludge, composted sludge, limed sludge, heating-dried sludge and solar-irradiated sludge. Results showed that for similar biosolids application rates NO 3 -N accumulated up to 3 times as much in the Ferrosol than in Podosol soil. However, there was a fixed 20% NO 3 -N loss from the 20 cm amended-Ferrosol topsoil, whilst the N-nitrified expected to leach down from 20 cm amended-Podosol topsoil layer ranged from 42% to 76% of the accumulated NO 3 -N, depending on the biosolid type. After all, NO 3 -N expected to leach from Podosol soil ranged from 0.6 (heating-dried sludge) to 3.9 times (limed sludge) relative to Ferrosol soil at similar biosolid application rates. Nevertheless, the risk of NO 3 -N groundwater contamination caused by biosolids applied at 0.5−8.0 dry Mg/ha rates could be considered very low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASCE. Land Application of Wastewater Sludges: a Report of the Task Committee on Water Pollution Management of the Environmental Engineering Division, N.Y.: Am. Soc. Civil Eng., 1987.

  2. A Guide to the Biosolids Risk Assessments for the EPA Part 503 Rule, United States Environ. Protection Agency. Wash.: Office of Wastewater Management, 1995, p. 143.

  3. Cameron K.C., Di, H.J., and Mclaren, R.G. Is the Soil an Appropriate Dumping Ground for our Wastes? Australian and New Zealand “National Soils Conference, Melbourne: 1996, pp. 31–53.

  4. Cassel D.K. and Nielsen D.R., Field Capacity and Available Water Capacity, Methods of Soil Analysis, Klute A., Ed., Madison: Am. Soc. Agronomy, Inc.; Soil Sci. Society America, Inc., 1986, pp. 901–926.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cogger C.G., Sullivan D.M., Bary, A.I., and Kropf, I.A., Matching Plant-Available Nitrogen from Biosolids with Dryland Wheat Needs, J. Production Agriculture, 1996, no. 11, pp. 41–47.

  6. Di, H.J., Cameron, K.C., Silva, J.C., et al, Critical Nitrogen Application Rates Affecting Nitrate Leaching in NZ Dairy Pastures, New Horizons for a New Century, Australian and New Zealand Second Joint Soils Conference, Adams, J.A. and Metherell A.K., Eds., New Zealand Soc. Soil Sci., Lincoln Univ., 2000, pp. 83–84.

  7. Edis, R., Transfer Function Modelling of Bromite and Nitrate Leaching Through Soil with and without Plants, Melbourne: Univ. Melbourne, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein, E., The Science of Composting, Lancaster: Technomic Publishing Company Inc., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frank R. The Use of Biosolids from Wastewater Treatment Plants in Agriculture, Environ, Management, 1998, vol. 9, pp. 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haermg, K.C., Daniels, W.L., and Feagley, S.E., Reclaiming Mined Lands with Biosolids, Manures, and Papermill Sludges, Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands, Bartels J., Ed., Madison, Am. Soc. Agronomy, Crop Service Soc., America Soil Sci. Soc., America, 2000, pp. 615–644.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isbell, R.F. The Australian Soil Classification, Melboume: CSIRO Australia, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joshua W.D., Michalk D.L., Curtis I.H. et al., The Potential for Contamination of Soil and Surface Waters from Sewage Sludge (Biosolids) in a Sheep Grazing Study, Georderma, 1998, no. 84, pp. 135–156.

  13. Knox, E. and Moody, D.W., Influence of Hydrology, Soil Properties, and Agricultural Land Use on Nitrogen in Groundwater, Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitabilit, Follett, R.P., Keeney, D.R., and Crnse, R.M., Eds., Madison: Soil Sci. America Inc, 1991, Chap. 3, pp. 19–57.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laverman, A.M., Zoomer, H.R., van Verseveld, H.A., and Verhoef, H.A. Temporal and Spatial Variation of Nitrogen Transformations in a Coniferous Forest Soil, Soil Biology Biochemistry, 2000, vol. 32, pp. 1661–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Magesan, G.N., Clydon, J.J., and Harris, S., Influence of Municipal Effluent Application on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties, 1st. Int. Conference — Contaminants and Soil Environ., Adelaide, 1996, pp. 269–270, 325.

  16. Martin, D.L., Gilley, J.R., and Skaggs, R.W., Soil Water Balance and Management, Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability, Follett R.F., Keeney D.R., Cruse, R.M., Madison: Soil Sci. Soc. America, Inc., 1991, chap. 10, pp. 199–235: 357.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Menelik, G., Reneau, R.B. Jr, Simpson, T.C., Hawkins, G.W. Effects of Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilization on Nitrogen Losses from Soils Used for Corn Production, Virginia: Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., 1990, pp. 1–167.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell, D.S., Edwards, A.C., and Ferrier, R.C. Changes in Fluxes of N and P in Water Draining a Stand of Scots Pine Treated with Sewage Sludge, Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, vol. 139, pp. 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pascual, J.A., Ayuso, M., Gorcia, C., and Hernández, Characterization of Urban Wastes According to Fertility and Phytotoxicity Parameters, Waste Management Research, 1997, vol. 15, pp. 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Polgase, P.J. and Robinson, M.B., Sustainable Use of Biosolids in Plantation Forests, 1st Int. Conf.-Contaminants and Soil Environ, Adelaide, 1996, pp. 121–122.

  21. Rayment, G.E. and Higginson F.R., Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods, Melboume; Sydney: Inkata Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shaffer, M.J., Halvorson, A.D. and Pierce, F.J., Nitrate Leaching and Economic Analysis Package (NLEAP): Model Description and Application, Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability, Follett, R.F., Keeney, D.R., and Crose, R.M., Eds., Madison: Soil Sci. Soc. America, 1991, Chap. 13, pp. 285–332: 357.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharpley, A.N., Daniel, T., Sims, T., et al., Agriculture Phosphorus and Eutrophication, United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, 1999, p. 37.

  24. Shepherd M.A. Factors Affecting Nitrate Leaching from Sewage Sludges Applied to Sandy Soil in Arable Agriculture, Agriculture Ecosystem Environ., 1996, vol. 58, pp. 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, S.J. and Cassel, D.K., Estimating Nitrate Leaching in Soil Materials, Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability, Follett, R.F., Keeney, D.R., and Cruse, R.M., Eds., Madison: Soil Sci. Soc. America, Inc. 1991, Chap. 8, pp. 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith S.R, Woods V., and Evans T.D. Nitrate Dynamics in Biosolids-Treated Soils. 1. Influence of Biosolids Type and Soil Type, Bioresource Technology, 1998, vol. 66, pp. 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sparkes, J., Environmental Implication of the Use of Sewage Products, The Agricultural and Horticultural Use of Sewage Sludge, Elmes, D. and Mallen-Cooper, J., Eds., Hawkesbury Campus: The Australian Institute of Agricultural Science and New South Wales Branch, University of Western Australia, 1990, Paper no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., and Dickey, D.A. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biometrical Approach, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vesilind, P.A., Hartman, G.C., and Skene, E.T., Sludge Management and Disposal for the Practicing Engineer, Michigan: Lewis Publ. Inc., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. White R.E., Principles and Practices of Soil Science: the Soil as a Natural Resource, Victoria Australia: Blackwell Science Ltd., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. White, R.E., Heng, L.K., and Edis, R.B., Transfer Function Approaches to Modeling Solute Transport in Soils, Physical Nonequilibrium in Soils: Modeling and Application, Chelsea; Michigan: Ann Arbor Press, 1998, Chap. 12, pp. 311–347.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Willett, I.R., Jakobsen, P., Malafant, K.W.J., and Bond, W.J., Effects of Land Disposal of Lime-Treated Sewage Sludge on Soil Properties and Plant Growth, Canberra: CSIRO Institute of Biological Resources, Division of Water and Land Resources, 1984, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Williams, J.R. and Kissel, D.E., Water Percolation: an Indicator of Nitrogen Leaching Potential, Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability, Follett, R.F., Keeney, D.R., and Cruse, R.M., Madison: Soil Sci. America, Inc 1991, Chap. 4, pp. 59–83: 357.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Correa.

Additional information

Published in Russian in Vodnye Resursy, 2006, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 492–503.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Correa, R.S., White, R.E. & Weatherley, A.J. Risk of nitrate leaching from two soils amended with biosolids. Water Resour 33, 453–462 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807806040117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807806040117

Keywords

Navigation