Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of void fraction on the submerged perforated sheet hydraulic friction factor

  • Nuclear Power Stations
  • Published:
Thermal Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results from an experimental investigation of two-phase flow motion through a submerged perforated sheet (SPS) obtained at the Elektrogorsk Research Center test facility are presented. The test facility, the test section of which is a transverse “cutout” from the full-scale PGV-1000 steam generator with the models of vessel internals, is described in detail. The procedure for carrying out trial startups is outlined, and the system of instrument and control devices is described. The SPS used in all experimental modes of operation had the perforation ratio (the hole area to the sheet area ratio) equal to 5.7%. The pressure in the system was around 7 MPa, and the flow rate of supplied steam was varied from 4.23 to 7.94 t/h, which corresponded to the steam velocity at the evaporation surface equal to 0.15–0.29 m/s. Distributions of pressure difference across the SPS and void fractions under the SPS and above it are obtained. The SPS hydraulic friction factor for a two-phase flow is determined as a result of processing the experimental data. A correction for two-phase nature of the flow for the SPS operating conditions is determined by comparing the obtained SPS hydraulic friction factor for a two-phase flow with the SPS hydraulic friction factor to single-phase flow of steam. It is shown that this correction can be either greater than unity (at low void fractions) or less than unity (at high void fractions).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. G. Ageev, V. B. Karasev, I. T. Serov, and V. F. Titov, Separation Devices at Nuclear Power Plants (Energoizdat, Moscow, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. G. Rassokhin, Steam Generating Installations at Nuclear Power Plants (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. B. Trunov, S. A. Logvinov, and Yu. G. Dragunov, Hydrodynamic and Thermochemical Processes in the Steam Generators of VVER-Based Nuclear Power Plants (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Kutepov, L. S. Sterman, and N. G. Styushin, Hydrodynamics and Heat Transfer during Vaporization (Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Melikhov, O. Melikhov, Yu. Parfenov, and A. Nerovnov, “Simulation of the thermal hydraulic processes in the horizontal steam generator with the use of the different interfacial friction correlations,” Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install., No. 5 (2011), Article ID 181393, DOI: 10.1155/2011/181393.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. A. Nerovnov, Yu. V. Parfenov, V. I. Melikhov, and O. I. Melikhov, “A comparative analysis of the calculation expressions for a two-velocity model describing two-phase flow of steam-water mixture across a tube bundle,” Therm. Eng. 59(9), 726 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. I. Melikhov, O. I. Melikhov, and A. A. Nerovnov, “The influence of interphase hydraulic friction models on the calculations of steam-water mixture flow in a steam generator,” Vestnik MEI, No. 1, 43–48 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. G. Asmolov, V. N. Blinkov, V. I. Melikhov, O. I. Melikhov, A. A. Nerovnov, and Yu. V. Parfenov, “Comparison of two approaches for calculating the force interaction between a two-phase flow and a tube bundle,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Yadern. Energ., No. 3, 3–8 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Yanssen, “Pressure loss in a two-phase steam-water flow moving through abrupt constrictions and expansions in the pressure range 42–98 atm,” in Advances in the Field of Heat Transfer, Ed. by V. M. Borishanskii (Mir, Moscow, 1970), pp. 147–169 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. I. Barenblatt, Similarity, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics: Theory and Applications for Geophysical Hydrodynamics (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. S. Kutateladze and M. A. Styrikovich, Hydrodynamics of Gas-Liquid Systems (Energiya, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. S. Dubrovskii and A. G. Ageev, “Hydrodynamics of submerged perforated boards,” Therm. Eng. 21(8) (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. A. Ryabov and Yu. V. Kozlov, “An experimental investigation into the hydrodynamics of submerged perforated sheets,” Therm. Eng. 31(8) (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. A. Ryabov, V. B. Karasev, and Yu. V. Kozlov, “An experimental investigation of the hydraulic friction of perforated sheets on a steam-water mixture,” Therm. Eng. 31(6) (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. V. Vasil’eva, I. S. Dubrovskii, A. G. Ageev, V. B. Karasev, E. V. Sakovich, and V. D. Bainyakshin, “Hydrodynamics of the submerged perforated boards used in the steam generators at nuclear power plants,” Elektr. Stn., No. 8, 12–15 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. G. Ageev, R. V. Vasil’eva, A. I. Dmitriev, G. A. Tarankov, and V. F. Titov, “Investigation of the hydrodynamics in a PGV-1000 steam generator,” Elektr. Stn., No. 6, 19–23 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. P. Svistunov and G. A. Tarankov, “The effect the submerged perforated sheet design has on steam distribution,” Energomashinostr., No. 1, 15–19 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. S. Saakov, E. P. Svistunov, V. Yu. Pikus, A. V. Nekrasov, V. P. Sevast’yanov, V. L. Mukhachev, G. A. Tarankov, and V. P. Molchanov, “Investigating the equalizing ability of the submerged perforated sheet in a PGV-1000 steam generator,” Therm. Eng. 39(7) (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. B. Trunov, V. V. Sotskov, A. G. Ageev, and R. V. Vasil’eva, “Calculated substantiation of the separation arrangement used in a PGV-1500 steam generator,” VANT, Ser. Obesp. Bezop. AES, Issue 13, 43–50 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. G. Ageev, R. V. Vasil’eva, I. V. Elkin, V. I. Melikhov, O. I. Melikhov, S. M. Nikonov, Yu. V. Parfenov, A. A. Nerovnov, and A. V. Troshin, “Validating the STEG computer code against experimental data,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Horizontal Steam Generators, OKB Gidropress, Podolsk, May 19–21, 2010, Electronic data 2010, CD-ROM No. sgpg2010–047.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. N. Blinkov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.N. Blinkov, I.V. Elkin, D.A. Emelianov, V.I. Melikhov, O.I. Melikhov, A.A. Nerovnov, S.M. Nikonov, Yu.V. Parfenov, 2015, published in Teploenergetika.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blinkov, V.N., Elkin, I.V., Emelianov, D.A. et al. The influence of void fraction on the submerged perforated sheet hydraulic friction factor. Therm. Eng. 62, 484–489 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601515070010

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601515070010

Keywords

Navigation