Skip to main content
Log in

Nose Part of the Body of Revolution Having Minimum Aerodynamic Drag in the Range of Large Subsonic Velocities

  • Published:
Fluid Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

The problem of constructing axisymmetric nose parts having minimum aerodynamic drag in the range of large subsonic flight velocities under a given constraint on the aspect ratio is solved. The search for optimum shapes is based on the local linearization approaches, which were used in analyzing the results of simulations within the framework of Navier—Stokes equations and ensured the convergence with a limiting reduction in direct calculations of the numerical optimization process at large (more than 70) number of geometric parameters. The effect of additional restrictions imposed on the generator curvature on the drag is studied. The nose parts thus constructed and those having near-optimum characteristics are compared at subsonic and supersonic velocities; the latter forebodies are the Ryabouchinsky half-cavity and a truncated power-law body. The known feature of the bodies realizing zero or minimum wave drag at a given length, namely, the possibility of the formation of flat-faced nose as a region of boundary extremum, is confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Gilbarg, D. and Shiffman, M., On bodies achieving extreme values of the critical Mach number, J. Ration. Mech. and Anal., 1954, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 209–230.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kozhuro, L.A., Calculations of axisymmetric jet flow past bodies according to the Ryabouchinsky scheme, Uch. Zap. TsAGI, 1980, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kraiko, A.N., Plane and axisymmetric configurations in a flow with maximum critical Mach number, Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1987, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 941–950.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zigangareeva, L.M. and Kiselev, O.M., Separated inviscid gas flow past a disk and a body with maximum critical Mach number, Fluid Dyn., 1996, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 477–482.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vyshinskii, V.V. and Kuznetsov, E.N., Study of flow past bodies of revolution with the Ryabouchinsky generator, Dokl. Akad Nauk SSSR, 1991, vol. 321, no. 1, pp. 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vyshinskii, V.V., Kuznetsov, E.N., and Mikhailov, P.D., Bodies of revolution having minimum drag in a transonic gas flow, Uch. Zap. TsAGI, 1992, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 78–81.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eggers Jr., A.J., Resnikoff, M.M., and Dennis, D.H., Bodies of revolution having minimum drag at high supersonic air speeds, NACA Rep. No. 1306, 1957.

  8. Miele, A., Slender shapes of minimum wave drag, in Theory of Optimum Aerodynamic Shapes, chap. 13, Ed. by A. Miele, (New York: Academic, 1965).

  9. Aeromekhanika sverkhzvukovogo obtekaniya tel vrashcheniya stepennoi formy (Aeromechanics of Supersonic Flow past Power-Law Bodies of Revolution), Ed. by. G. L. Grozdovskii, Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1975.

  10. Kraiko, A.N., Pudovikov, D.Ye., P’yankov, K.S., and Tillyayeva, N.I., Axisymmetric nose shapes of specified aspect ratio, optimum or close to optimum with respect to wave drag, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 2003, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 703–730.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Takovitskii, S.A., Analytical solution in the problem of constructing noses with minimum wave drag, Fluid Dyn., 2006, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 308–312.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bol’shiyanov, I.P., Zakharov, N.N., P’yankov, K.S., and Tillyaeva, N.I., Optimal axisymmetric noses in a flow. Calculations and Experiments, Fluid Dyn., 2018, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 296–304.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraiko, A.N., Newton’s problem of the optimal forebody. History of the solution, Fluid Dyn. 2019, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1009–1019.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takovitskii, S.A. and Ivanyushkin, D.S., On drag minimization of axisymmetric bodies in the range of high subsonic speeds, TsAGI Sci. J., 2018, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 701–712.

  15. Takovitskii, S.A., About construction of flat bodies with increased critical Mach number, TsAGI Sci. J., 2016, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 563–579.

  16. Takovitskii, S.A., Analytical solution to the wave-drag minimization problem for an axisymmetric fore-body using local linearization, Fluid Dyn., 2018, vol. 53, suppl. 2, pp. 38–44.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kraiko, A.N., Teoreticheskaya gazovaya dinamika: klassika i sovremennost’ (Theoretical Gas Dynamics. Classics and State of the Art), Moscow: Torus Press, 2010.

  18. Takovitskii, S.A., Optimizatsionnye zadachi sverkhzvukovoi aerodinamiki (Optimization Problems in Supersonic Aerodynamics), Moscow: Nauka, 2015.

  19. Mazurov, A.P., Calculations of supersonic flow past the nacelle rear in the presence of an exhaust jet, Uch. Zap. TsAGI, 1991, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beam, R. and Warming, R.F., An implicit scheme for the compressible Navier—Stokes equations, AIAA Paper 77-645, 1977.

  21. Baldwin, B.S. and Lomax, H., Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows, AIAA Paper 78-257, 1978.

Download references

Funding

The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 19-01-00671).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Takovitskii.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by M. Lebedev

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazurov, A.P., Takovitskii, S.A. Nose Part of the Body of Revolution Having Minimum Aerodynamic Drag in the Range of Large Subsonic Velocities. Fluid Dyn 57, 86–95 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462822010074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462822010074

Keywords:

Navigation